Comparison of two detection methods in thin layer chromatographic analysis of some herbicides in a Coastal Savanna Soil in Ghana

Q4 Environmental Science
S. Afful, C. Akpabli, P. Yeboah, S. Dogbe
{"title":"Comparison of two detection methods in thin layer chromatographic analysis of some herbicides in a Coastal Savanna Soil in Ghana","authors":"S. Afful, C. Akpabli, P. Yeboah, S. Dogbe","doi":"10.4314/WAJAE.V12I1.45778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"o-tolidine plus potassium iodide and photosynthesis inhibition detection methods were investigated for the analysis of three triazine herbicides (atrazine, ametryne, simazine) and two urea herbicides (diuron, metobromuron) in a coastal savanna soil using thin layer chromatography to compare the suitability of the two methods for the study of the herbicides. This was done by spiking 5 g of the soil sample with specific amount of the herbicide standards to generate herbicide-soil concentration of 40.24, 41.46, 40.28, 39.90 and 40.64 ig/g for atrazine, ametryne, simazine, diuron and metobromuron, respectively. Extraction was performed with acetone/hexane mixture (4:1) and the detection limit of each herbicide was then determined. In all, the photosynthesis inhibition method performed better for both the triazine and the urea herbicides, while the o-tolidine plus potassium iodide method was suitable for only the triazine herbicides. With the photosynthesis inhibition method, detectability in the range of 0.004–0.008 ± 0.002 ig/g was attained for the herbicides using the unclean extracts. In the case of o-tolidine plus potassium iodide method, detectability of 0.008–0.406 ± 0.02 ig/g was obtained. With the clean up extracts detectability in the range of 0.025–0.162 ± 0.004 ig/g was obtained using the photosynthesis inhibition method. However, metobromuron was not detected in the cleaned up extracts when o-tolidine plus potassium iodide detection method was used. For the methods described, clean up with SPE cartridge, equipped with C-18, is not critical to obtain the desired results.","PeriodicalId":39286,"journal":{"name":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":"57 76 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/WAJAE.V12I1.45778","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/WAJAE.V12I1.45778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

o-tolidine plus potassium iodide and photosynthesis inhibition detection methods were investigated for the analysis of three triazine herbicides (atrazine, ametryne, simazine) and two urea herbicides (diuron, metobromuron) in a coastal savanna soil using thin layer chromatography to compare the suitability of the two methods for the study of the herbicides. This was done by spiking 5 g of the soil sample with specific amount of the herbicide standards to generate herbicide-soil concentration of 40.24, 41.46, 40.28, 39.90 and 40.64 ig/g for atrazine, ametryne, simazine, diuron and metobromuron, respectively. Extraction was performed with acetone/hexane mixture (4:1) and the detection limit of each herbicide was then determined. In all, the photosynthesis inhibition method performed better for both the triazine and the urea herbicides, while the o-tolidine plus potassium iodide method was suitable for only the triazine herbicides. With the photosynthesis inhibition method, detectability in the range of 0.004–0.008 ± 0.002 ig/g was attained for the herbicides using the unclean extracts. In the case of o-tolidine plus potassium iodide method, detectability of 0.008–0.406 ± 0.02 ig/g was obtained. With the clean up extracts detectability in the range of 0.025–0.162 ± 0.004 ig/g was obtained using the photosynthesis inhibition method. However, metobromuron was not detected in the cleaned up extracts when o-tolidine plus potassium iodide detection method was used. For the methods described, clean up with SPE cartridge, equipped with C-18, is not critical to obtain the desired results.
加纳沿海草原土壤中几种除草剂薄层色谱分析两种检测方法的比较
采用薄层色谱法对沿海稀树草原土壤中3种三嗪类除草剂(阿特拉津、阿米林、西马辛)和2种脲类除草剂(地乌龙、甲溴溴隆)进行了邻甲苯胺加碘化钾和光合作用抑制检测,比较了两种方法对该除草剂研究的适用性。按除草剂标准用量在土壤样品中喷洒5 g,使莠去津、莠去津、辛咪嗪、迪乌隆和溴溴隆的除草剂土壤浓度分别为40.24、41.46、40.28、39.90和40.64 ig/g。丙酮/己烷(4:1)混合萃取,测定各除草剂的检出限。综上所述,光合抑制法对三嗪类除草剂和尿素类除草剂均有较好的抑制效果,而邻甲苯胺加碘化钾法仅对三嗪类除草剂有较好的抑制效果。采用光合抑制法测定,不洁净提取物的检出率在0.004 ~ 0.008±0.002 ig/g范围内。邻甲苯胺加碘化钾法的检出率为0.008 ~ 0.406±0.02 ig/g。净化液的检出率为0.025 ~ 0.162±0.004 ig/g。用邻甲苯胺加碘化钾法检测,未检出甲溴隆。对于所描述的方法,使用配备C-18的SPE滤芯进行清理对于获得预期结果并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
West African Journal of Applied Ecology
West African Journal of Applied Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This research journal has been established by the Ecological Laboratory Unit of the University of Ghana, Accra to publish original papers, invited articles and book reviews in English on general ecology. Papers are peer reviewed by consulting editors. The journal is targeted at scientists, policy makers and the general public. The subject areas to be covered include the following: -Theoretical and Applied Ecology- Environmental Studies- Environmental Management- Population Studies- Sustainable use of Natural Resources- Atmospheric Science- Aquatic Sciences and Oceanography- Terrestrial Ecology- Soil Sciences- Human Settlements- Disaster Preparedness and Disaster Reduction- Sustainable Development- Traditional Knowledge on Biodiversity and its sustainable use- Application in Agriculture and Land Use- Health and Environmental Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信