Analysis of ayurvedic clinical trials registered in clinical trials registry of india: retrospective versus prospective registration

IF 0.2
P. Bolshete
{"title":"Analysis of ayurvedic clinical trials registered in clinical trials registry of india: retrospective versus prospective registration","authors":"P. Bolshete","doi":"10.4103/asl.ASL_44_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Registration of clinical trials is recommended at or before the first participant enrolment. There is limited data available on the registration of Ayurvedic clinical trials in Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Aim: The aim of this analysis was to determine the proportion of retrospectively and prospectively registered Ayurvedic clinical trials in CTRI. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of Ayurvedic clinical trials registered in CTRI. List of trials registered in CTRI was accessed from 2012 to 2016 (n= 4713; last accessed on 21 June 2016) and screened to identify Ayurvedic trials. Other AYUSH trials were excluded from the analysis. Following data was collected - registration type (retrospective/prospective), study site (state), postgraduate thesis (yes/no), type of trial (interventional/observational), and study design. Data was summarized using summary statistics. Results: A total of 507 (10.8%) Ayurvedic trials were included in this analysis. The registration of Ayurvedic clinical trials increased from 9.3% (2012) to 19.9% (2016). Of 507 trials, 373 (73.6%) were registered retrospectively and remaining 134 (26.4%) were registered prospectively. A total of 277 trials were part of postgraduate theses (220 retrospective; 57 prospective) and 229 were not (152 retrospective; 77 prospective); 481 trials were interventional (357 retrospective; 124 prospective); 320 were randomized (236 retrospective; 84 prospective). The 507 trials had 686 sites, highest being in Gujarat (38.3%), followed by Maharashtra (19.2%), and Karnataka (10.1%). Conclusions: Results from this study showed that majority of Ayurvedic clinical trials have been registered retrospectively, however there is increase in prospective registration. More than half of the study sites of CTRI registered trials were located in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka reflecting limited registration in other parts of India.","PeriodicalId":7805,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Science of Life","volume":"37 1","pages":"9 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Science of Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_44_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Context: Registration of clinical trials is recommended at or before the first participant enrolment. There is limited data available on the registration of Ayurvedic clinical trials in Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Aim: The aim of this analysis was to determine the proportion of retrospectively and prospectively registered Ayurvedic clinical trials in CTRI. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of Ayurvedic clinical trials registered in CTRI. List of trials registered in CTRI was accessed from 2012 to 2016 (n= 4713; last accessed on 21 June 2016) and screened to identify Ayurvedic trials. Other AYUSH trials were excluded from the analysis. Following data was collected - registration type (retrospective/prospective), study site (state), postgraduate thesis (yes/no), type of trial (interventional/observational), and study design. Data was summarized using summary statistics. Results: A total of 507 (10.8%) Ayurvedic trials were included in this analysis. The registration of Ayurvedic clinical trials increased from 9.3% (2012) to 19.9% (2016). Of 507 trials, 373 (73.6%) were registered retrospectively and remaining 134 (26.4%) were registered prospectively. A total of 277 trials were part of postgraduate theses (220 retrospective; 57 prospective) and 229 were not (152 retrospective; 77 prospective); 481 trials were interventional (357 retrospective; 124 prospective); 320 were randomized (236 retrospective; 84 prospective). The 507 trials had 686 sites, highest being in Gujarat (38.3%), followed by Maharashtra (19.2%), and Karnataka (10.1%). Conclusions: Results from this study showed that majority of Ayurvedic clinical trials have been registered retrospectively, however there is increase in prospective registration. More than half of the study sites of CTRI registered trials were located in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Karnataka reflecting limited registration in other parts of India.
在印度临床试验注册中心注册的阿育吠陀临床试验分析:回顾性与前瞻性注册
背景:建议在首次受试者入组时或之前进行临床试验注册。在印度临床试验登记处(CTRI)注册阿育吠陀临床试验的可用数据有限。目的:本分析的目的是确定回顾性和前瞻性注册的阿育吠陀临床试验在CTRI中的比例。方法:这是一个在CTRI注册的阿育吠陀临床试验的横断面分析。检索2012 - 2016年在CTRI注册的试验列表(n= 4713;最后一次访问于2016年6月21日),并进行筛选以确定阿育吠陀试验。其他AYUSH试验被排除在分析之外。收集以下数据-注册类型(回顾性/前瞻性)、研究地点(州)、研究生论文(是/否)、试验类型(干预性/观察性)和研究设计。采用汇总统计对数据进行汇总。结果:共有507项(10.8%)阿育吠陀试验被纳入本分析。阿育吠陀临床试验注册率从9.3%(2012年)上升到19.9%(2016年)。在507项试验中,373项(73.6%)回顾性登记,其余134项(26.4%)前瞻性登记。共有277项试验是研究生论文的一部分(220项是回顾性的;57例前瞻性研究),229例非前瞻性研究(152例回顾性研究;77准);481项试验是介入性的(357项是回顾性的;124准);随机选取320例(回顾性236例;84准)。507个试验共有686个地点,最高的是古吉拉特邦(38.3%),其次是马哈拉施特拉邦(19.2%)和卡纳塔克邦(10.1%)。结论:本研究的结果表明,大多数阿育吠陀临床试验都是回顾性登记的,但前瞻性登记的数量有所增加。CTRI注册试验的一半以上的研究地点位于古吉拉特邦、马哈拉施特拉邦和卡纳塔克邦,反映出印度其他地区的注册有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书