the Change of Corneal SurfaCe temperature during SurfaCe refraCtiVe SurgiCal proCedureS performed uSing exCimer laSerS with different repetitiVe frequenCieS

Q4 Medicine
Csaba Szekrényesi, Gábor L Sándor, A. Gyenes, Huba J. M. Kiss, T. Filkorn, Z. Nagy
{"title":"the Change of Corneal SurfaCe temperature during SurfaCe refraCtiVe SurgiCal proCedureS performed uSing exCimer laSerS with different repetitiVe frequenCieS","authors":"Csaba Szekrényesi, Gábor L Sándor, A. Gyenes, Huba J. M. Kiss, T. Filkorn, Z. Nagy","doi":"10.5604/14270994.1222609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intoduction. refractive surgery is still one of the most frequently performed procedures in ophthalmology. millions of patients every year are operated with surface lasers as well as with deep or lamellar lasers. The operational technique and tools are constantly improving. Aim. To examine the changes in the temperature of the corneal surface during refractive surgery procedures performed using different types of excimer lasers. Material and methods. 150 eyes of 111 patients were included in the study. The corneal surface temperature was measured with a calibrated eBro Tlc730 infrared thermometer (wTw gmBh, germany) before photorefractive keratectomy (prK), after epithelial removal and immediately after finishing the procedure. The average myopic correction was -3.9 ± 1.9 dpt (ranging from -2.5 dpt to -6.5 dpt). The average age of the patients was 25 ± 3.3 years. Results. using anova variance analysis, a statistically significant difference in the change of the temperature was found between different laser platforms. with the post hoc Bonferroni correction, a significant difference between the mel 80 (carl Zeiss meditec, Jena, germany) and the two other analyzed excimer lasers, mel 70 (carl Zeiss meditec, Jena, germany) and wavelight allegretto 400 (alcon wavelight, erlangen, germany), was found. There was no statistically significant difference between the wavelight allegretto and mel 70 excimer lasers. Conclusions. The moderate cooling effect of the different excimer laser platforms might be related to different airflow systems used in the models. it seems that the rise in the surface temperature is not a causative factor of postoperative subepithelial corneal haze when the procedure is performed with lasers using frequencies lower or equal to 400 hz.","PeriodicalId":55698,"journal":{"name":"New Medicine","volume":"449 1","pages":"79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/14270994.1222609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intoduction. refractive surgery is still one of the most frequently performed procedures in ophthalmology. millions of patients every year are operated with surface lasers as well as with deep or lamellar lasers. The operational technique and tools are constantly improving. Aim. To examine the changes in the temperature of the corneal surface during refractive surgery procedures performed using different types of excimer lasers. Material and methods. 150 eyes of 111 patients were included in the study. The corneal surface temperature was measured with a calibrated eBro Tlc730 infrared thermometer (wTw gmBh, germany) before photorefractive keratectomy (prK), after epithelial removal and immediately after finishing the procedure. The average myopic correction was -3.9 ± 1.9 dpt (ranging from -2.5 dpt to -6.5 dpt). The average age of the patients was 25 ± 3.3 years. Results. using anova variance analysis, a statistically significant difference in the change of the temperature was found between different laser platforms. with the post hoc Bonferroni correction, a significant difference between the mel 80 (carl Zeiss meditec, Jena, germany) and the two other analyzed excimer lasers, mel 70 (carl Zeiss meditec, Jena, germany) and wavelight allegretto 400 (alcon wavelight, erlangen, germany), was found. There was no statistically significant difference between the wavelight allegretto and mel 70 excimer lasers. Conclusions. The moderate cooling effect of the different excimer laser platforms might be related to different airflow systems used in the models. it seems that the rise in the surface temperature is not a causative factor of postoperative subepithelial corneal haze when the procedure is performed with lasers using frequencies lower or equal to 400 hz.
使用不同重复频率的准分子激光进行表面屈光手术过程中角膜表面温度的变化
Intoduction。屈光手术仍然是眼科最常用的手术之一。每年有数以百万计的患者使用表面激光以及深层或层状激光进行手术。操作技术和工具在不断改进。的目标。目的:观察不同类型准分子激光在屈光手术过程中角膜表面温度的变化。材料和方法。研究纳入了111名患者的150只眼睛。在光屈光性角膜切除术(prK)前、上皮切除后和手术结束后立即用校准的eBro Tlc730红外温度计(wTw gmBh, germany)测量角膜表面温度。平均近视矫正为-3.9±1.9 dpt (-2.5 ~ -6.5 dpt)。患者平均年龄25±3.3岁。结果。通过方差分析,发现不同激光平台之间的温度变化具有统计学意义。通过后期Bonferroni校正,发现mel 80(卡尔蔡司meditec,耶拿,德国)和mel 70(卡尔蔡司meditec,耶拿,德国)和allegretto 400 (alcon waveight,埃尔兰根,德国)这两种被分析的准分子激光器之间存在显著差异。在小光波快板和mel 70准分子激光之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论。不同准分子激光平台的适度冷却效果可能与模型中使用的不同气流系统有关。当使用频率低于或等于400赫兹的激光进行手术时,表面温度的升高似乎不是术后上皮下角膜雾霭的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Medicine
New Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: - New Medicine is indexed in Index Copernicus (IC value 6.60) and registered in Embase/Excerpta Medica. - It is published in English and some issues in other languages. - New Medicine covers a broad spectrum of disciplines. - New Medicine is sent to national and medical libraries in several countries all over the world and to some libraries and institutions in Poland. It is also present on medical conferences. - New Medicine is published under the patronage of Polish Society of Health Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信