The effect of urinary catheter care bundle compliance on catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Q4 Medicine
Tuğba Yanık Yalçın, Ç. Erol, Fatma Irem Yesiler, Burcu Gönülal, Saliha Aydın
{"title":"The effect of urinary catheter care bundle compliance on catheter-associated urinary tract infections","authors":"Tuğba Yanık Yalçın, Ç. Erol, Fatma Irem Yesiler, Burcu Gönülal, Saliha Aydın","doi":"10.5505/turkhijyen.2022.79990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a global problem of increasing importance all over the world. HAI’s, Results: Urinary catheter care bundle compliance and standardized infection rates (SIR) of CA-UTI were assessed between June 2015 and December 2020. In 2015, bundle compliance was 0.80 (0.75-0.83), 0.88 (0.84-0.90) in 2016, 0.89 (0.87-0.91) in 2017, 0.90 (0.88-0.91) in 2018, 0.88 (0.85-0.89) in 2019, and 0.87 (0.84-0.88) in 2020. CA-UTI SIRs were 4.06 in 2015, 2.91 in 2016, 2.3 in 2017, 1.52 in 2018, 1.74 in 2019, and 2.81 in 2020. When the effect of the urinary catheter care bundle (in the years 2015-2018) is analyzed, it corresponds to a reduction of approximately 60%. “Catheter cleaning twice a day with a soapy sponge” was found to have the lowest compliance across all years. Conclusion: We observed that as bundle compliance increased, our CA-UTI rate decreased. However, the fact that our SIR values are >1 indicates that our infection control measures are inadequate. These findings imply that bundle components should be reviewed and/or that bundle compliance observation is lacking. Bundles can be used as an incentive to provide consistent and disciplined maintenance, but they are only one component of a larger improvement strategy. While main infection control systems (such as isolation, surveillance, and hand hygiene) are in routine, bundle applications should be integrated into these systems.","PeriodicalId":35553,"journal":{"name":"Turk hijiyen ve deneysel biyoloji dergisi. Turkish bulletin of hygiene and experimental biology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk hijiyen ve deneysel biyoloji dergisi. Turkish bulletin of hygiene and experimental biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/turkhijyen.2022.79990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a global problem of increasing importance all over the world. HAI’s, Results: Urinary catheter care bundle compliance and standardized infection rates (SIR) of CA-UTI were assessed between June 2015 and December 2020. In 2015, bundle compliance was 0.80 (0.75-0.83), 0.88 (0.84-0.90) in 2016, 0.89 (0.87-0.91) in 2017, 0.90 (0.88-0.91) in 2018, 0.88 (0.85-0.89) in 2019, and 0.87 (0.84-0.88) in 2020. CA-UTI SIRs were 4.06 in 2015, 2.91 in 2016, 2.3 in 2017, 1.52 in 2018, 1.74 in 2019, and 2.81 in 2020. When the effect of the urinary catheter care bundle (in the years 2015-2018) is analyzed, it corresponds to a reduction of approximately 60%. “Catheter cleaning twice a day with a soapy sponge” was found to have the lowest compliance across all years. Conclusion: We observed that as bundle compliance increased, our CA-UTI rate decreased. However, the fact that our SIR values are >1 indicates that our infection control measures are inadequate. These findings imply that bundle components should be reviewed and/or that bundle compliance observation is lacking. Bundles can be used as an incentive to provide consistent and disciplined maintenance, but they are only one component of a larger improvement strategy. While main infection control systems (such as isolation, surveillance, and hand hygiene) are in routine, bundle applications should be integrated into these systems.
导尿管护理束依从性对导尿管相关性尿路感染的影响
目的:医疗保健相关感染(HAI)是一个日益重要的全球性问题。结果:评估2015年6月至2020年12月CA-UTI的导尿管护理包依从性和标准化感染率(SIR)。2015年,束合规为0.80(0.75-0.83),2016年为0.88(0.84-0.90),2017年为0.89(0.87-0.91),2018年为0.90(0.88-0.91),2019年为0.88(0.85-0.89),2020年为0.87(0.84-0.88)。2015年CA-UTI SIRs为4.06,2016年为2.91,2017年为2.3,2018年为1.52,2019年为1.74,2020年为2.81。当分析尿管护理包(2015-2018年)的效果时,它相当于减少了约60%。“用肥皂海绵每天清洗两次导管”的依从性是所有年份中最低的。结论:我们观察到,随着束依从性的增加,我们的CA-UTI率下降。然而,我们的SIR值为bbb1,这表明我们的感染控制措施是不够的。这些发现意味着束组件应该被审查和/或束依从性观察是缺乏的。捆绑包可以用作提供一致和有纪律的维护的激励,但它们只是更大的改进策略的一个组成部分。虽然主要感染控制系统(如隔离、监测和手卫生)是常规的,但应将捆绑应用纳入这些系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信