Assessment of transparency of audit reports based on presentation of key audit matters

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Mirjana Hladika, J. Poljašević, Josipa Grbavac
{"title":"Assessment of transparency of audit reports based on presentation of key audit matters","authors":"Mirjana Hladika, J. Poljašević, Josipa Grbavac","doi":"10.51680/ev.34.2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: One of the ways to enhance transparency and usefulness of audit reports is to include information on key audit matters (KAMs). In this paper, based on the presented KAMs, we investigate transparency of audit reports of listed companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in Croatia. Methodology: For the purposes of this research, we collected and systematised data from published audit reports and then analysed them by means of descriptive statistical methods. Results: The research results show that in Croatia only a few audit reports lack a section on KAMs and there is no difference between the audit reports issued by the Big Four and the reports of other audit firms. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, most audit reports do not include a section on KAMs, but, unlike the Big Four, who disclose at least one KAM, other audit firms generally do not present any. Additionally, the research results show differences in the number of communicated KAMs between the audit reports prepared by the Big Four in Croatia and their reports for Bosnia and Herzegovina. There are also differences in the type of KAMs used in the two observed countries. Conclusion: Having analysed the situation in the two developing countries, we obtained different results. The discrepancies mainly stem from the varying degrees of transparency of the audit profession in each country.","PeriodicalId":42693,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomski Vjesnik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomski Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: One of the ways to enhance transparency and usefulness of audit reports is to include information on key audit matters (KAMs). In this paper, based on the presented KAMs, we investigate transparency of audit reports of listed companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in Croatia. Methodology: For the purposes of this research, we collected and systematised data from published audit reports and then analysed them by means of descriptive statistical methods. Results: The research results show that in Croatia only a few audit reports lack a section on KAMs and there is no difference between the audit reports issued by the Big Four and the reports of other audit firms. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, most audit reports do not include a section on KAMs, but, unlike the Big Four, who disclose at least one KAM, other audit firms generally do not present any. Additionally, the research results show differences in the number of communicated KAMs between the audit reports prepared by the Big Four in Croatia and their reports for Bosnia and Herzegovina. There are also differences in the type of KAMs used in the two observed countries. Conclusion: Having analysed the situation in the two developing countries, we obtained different results. The discrepancies mainly stem from the varying degrees of transparency of the audit profession in each country.
根据主要审计事项的列报,评估审计报告的透明度
目的:提高审计报告透明度和有用性的方法之一是纳入关键审计事项的信息。本文基于所提出的KAMs,对波黑和克罗地亚上市公司审计报告的透明度进行了研究。方法:为了本研究的目的,我们从公开的审计报告中收集和系统化数据,然后通过描述性统计方法对其进行分析。结果:研究结果表明,在克罗地亚,只有少数审计报告缺少KAMs部分,四大会计师事务所发布的审计报告与其他审计事务所的报告没有区别。在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,大多数审计报告不包括KAM部分,但是,与四大会计师事务所披露至少一项KAM不同,其他审计事务所通常不提供任何KAM。此外,研究结果显示,四大会计师事务所在克罗地亚编写的审计报告与它们为波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那编写的报告之间所传达的kam数量存在差异。两个被观察国家使用的kam类型也存在差异。结论:在分析了两个发展中国家的情况后,我们得到了不同的结果。这种差异主要源于各国审计行业透明度的不同程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ekonomski Vjesnik
Ekonomski Vjesnik ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信