School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Glang, M. McCart, Christabelle L. Moore, S. Davies
{"title":"School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI","authors":"A. Glang, M. McCart, Christabelle L. Moore, S. Davies","doi":"10.5206/eei.v27i2.7754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 94109 This work was supported in part by grant #H133B090010 made by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research to the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Oregon. The authors thank Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck, and Jeff Gau for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Other Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Glang, A. E., McCart, M., Moore, C. L., & Davies, S. (2018) School Psychologists’ Knowledge and SelfEfficacy in Working with Students with TBI. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 94-109. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss2/5 This Article Open Access after 1 year is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI Cover Page Footnote This work was supported in part by grant #H133B090010 made by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research to the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Oregon. The authors thank Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck, and Jeff Gau for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This article open access after 1 year is available in Exceptionality Education International: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/ vol27/iss2/5 Exceptionality Education International 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 94–109 ISSN 1918-5227 94 School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI Ann E. Glang, Melissa McCart, & Christabelle L. Moore University of Oregon Susan Davies University of Dayton Abstract Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI.Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of childhood death and disability worldwide (Faul, Xu, Wald, & Coronado, 2010). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that each year in the United States, 60,000 children are hospitalized with TBI; an additional 700,000 U.S. children visit emergency rooms for symptoms related to TBI (Faul et al., 2010). Brain injury is typically categorized as mild, moderate, or severe based on initial symptoms at the time of injury. Most (70–90%) TBI-related emergency visits are considered mild (Cassidy et al., 2004; Faul et al., 2010). Children Glang, McCart, Moore, & Davies 95 Exceptionality Education International, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2 with severe injuries are more likely to be hospitalized and to experience more significant disability. Children with moderate and severe injuries are likely to have cognitive, behavioural, and social difficulties that affect their long-term quality of life (Rivara, Vavilala, et al., 2012); with estimates of over 60% of children with moderate-to-severe TBI and 14% of children with mild TBI experiencing disability (Rivara, Koepsell, et al., 2012). Overall, approximately 145,000 children experience lasting effects of brain injury that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting (Zaloshnja, Miller, Langlois, & Selassie, 2008). Effects of TBI on School Performance Following brain injury, children face multiple challenges that affect school performance (Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2005; Gabbe et al., 2014; Hawley, 2004). Challenges with executive functioning, memory, attention, concentration, and processing speed can all impact school performance (Gerrard-Morris et al., 2010; Hawley, Ward, Magnay, & Mychalkiw, 2004; Moser, Schatz, & Jordan, 2005). Behavioural or psychological symptoms, impulsivity, and social and emotional issues are also common after TBI (Barlow et al., 2010; Li & Liu, 2013; Limond, Dorris, & McMillan, 2009; Ryan et al., 2016) and can negatively affect school performance. This array of challenges can be long lasting, leading to poor long-term school outcomes (Babikian, Merkley, Savage, Giza, & Levin, 2015; Davies, Fox, Glang, Ettel, & Thomas, 2013; McKinlay, Dalrymple-Alford, Horwood, & Fergusson, 2002). Children injured before age 7 could be at greater risk for significant skill deficits than those injured later in childhood (Anderson & Moore, 1995). Furthermore, they often have poor long-term outcomes that educators do not attribute to their injuries (Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2009; Schwartz et al., 2003). In a study of longterm school outcomes of children with TBI, Prasad, Swank, & Ewing-Cobbs (2016) found that children with complicated-mild and moderate injuries needed more supports 6 years post-injury than they did 2 years post-injury. This finding emphasizes the need for school teams to track and monitor the progress of students with TBI so they can respond promptly if difficulties emerge and can provide appropriate accommodations or special education services (Prasad et al., 2016). A large portion of children with TBI require interventions or supports beyond what is offered in general education classrooms (Dettmer, Ettel, Glang, & McAvoy, 2014). Evidence-based instructional methods can help mitigate the academic and behavioural challenges associated with TBI (Ylvisaker et al., 2001). For example, cognitive strategy instructional approaches and Direct Instruction have substantial evidence bases and show preliminary evidence of efficacy with students with TBI (Glang et al., 2008). However, because of a pervasive lack of awareness of TBI among general educators, school teams need support in implementation of effective practices. Role of School Psychologists Because they lead the assessment and evaluation process in school settings, school psychologists need skills, knowledge, and training to accurately evaluate and meet the educational needs of students with TBI (Davies et al., 2013; Hooper, Walker, & Howard, 2001). Given their extensive training in the assessment, identification, and educational School Psychologists’ Knowledge of TBI Exceptionality Education International, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2 96 intervention of learning and behaviour problems, school psychologists are uniquely positioned to support students with TBI (Davies et al., 2013). As a key member of the educational team that supports students, school psychologists have an essential role and are often viewed as the gatekeepers responsible for identifying students who need support and for determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). School psychologists also provide guidance to educators about the services appropriate to meeting a student’s educational needs (Davies et al., 2013; Davies & Ray, 2014; Hooper, 2006). Surprisingly, multiple surveys of school psychologists indicate that they lack the training, knowledge, and skills the","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":"27 1","pages":"94-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i2.7754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 94109 This work was supported in part by grant #H133B090010 made by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research to the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Oregon. The authors thank Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck, and Jeff Gau for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Other Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Glang, A. E., McCart, M., Moore, C. L., & Davies, S. (2018) School Psychologists’ Knowledge and SelfEfficacy in Working with Students with TBI. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 94-109. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss2/5 This Article Open Access after 1 year is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI Cover Page Footnote This work was supported in part by grant #H133B090010 made by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research to the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Oregon. The authors thank Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck, and Jeff Gau for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This article open access after 1 year is available in Exceptionality Education International: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/ vol27/iss2/5 Exceptionality Education International 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 94–109 ISSN 1918-5227 94 School Psychologists’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy in Working with Students with TBI Ann E. Glang, Melissa McCart, & Christabelle L. Moore University of Oregon Susan Davies University of Dayton Abstract Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI.Approximately 145,000 U.S. children experience lasting effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting. School psychologists have an essential role in identifying students who need support and in determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and perception of abilities related to TBI in a sample of school psychologists currently working in public schools. We surveyed school psychologists and found persistently low levels of knowledge and of perceived preparedness to work with these students. School psychologists with more experience working with students with TBI rated themselves significantly higher on their perceived ability to perform nearly all key duties of a school psychologist. To meet the academic and behavioural needs of students with TBI, all school psychologists need effective training in working with and evaluating students with TBI. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are a leading cause of childhood death and disability worldwide (Faul, Xu, Wald, & Coronado, 2010). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that each year in the United States, 60,000 children are hospitalized with TBI; an additional 700,000 U.S. children visit emergency rooms for symptoms related to TBI (Faul et al., 2010). Brain injury is typically categorized as mild, moderate, or severe based on initial symptoms at the time of injury. Most (70–90%) TBI-related emergency visits are considered mild (Cassidy et al., 2004; Faul et al., 2010). Children Glang, McCart, Moore, & Davies 95 Exceptionality Education International, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2 with severe injuries are more likely to be hospitalized and to experience more significant disability. Children with moderate and severe injuries are likely to have cognitive, behavioural, and social difficulties that affect their long-term quality of life (Rivara, Vavilala, et al., 2012); with estimates of over 60% of children with moderate-to-severe TBI and 14% of children with mild TBI experiencing disability (Rivara, Koepsell, et al., 2012). Overall, approximately 145,000 children experience lasting effects of brain injury that manifest in social, behavioural, physical, and cognitive challenges in the school setting (Zaloshnja, Miller, Langlois, & Selassie, 2008). Effects of TBI on School Performance Following brain injury, children face multiple challenges that affect school performance (Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2005; Gabbe et al., 2014; Hawley, 2004). Challenges with executive functioning, memory, attention, concentration, and processing speed can all impact school performance (Gerrard-Morris et al., 2010; Hawley, Ward, Magnay, & Mychalkiw, 2004; Moser, Schatz, & Jordan, 2005). Behavioural or psychological symptoms, impulsivity, and social and emotional issues are also common after TBI (Barlow et al., 2010; Li & Liu, 2013; Limond, Dorris, & McMillan, 2009; Ryan et al., 2016) and can negatively affect school performance. This array of challenges can be long lasting, leading to poor long-term school outcomes (Babikian, Merkley, Savage, Giza, & Levin, 2015; Davies, Fox, Glang, Ettel, & Thomas, 2013; McKinlay, Dalrymple-Alford, Horwood, & Fergusson, 2002). Children injured before age 7 could be at greater risk for significant skill deficits than those injured later in childhood (Anderson & Moore, 1995). Furthermore, they often have poor long-term outcomes that educators do not attribute to their injuries (Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2009; Schwartz et al., 2003). In a study of longterm school outcomes of children with TBI, Prasad, Swank, & Ewing-Cobbs (2016) found that children with complicated-mild and moderate injuries needed more supports 6 years post-injury than they did 2 years post-injury. This finding emphasizes the need for school teams to track and monitor the progress of students with TBI so they can respond promptly if difficulties emerge and can provide appropriate accommodations or special education services (Prasad et al., 2016). A large portion of children with TBI require interventions or supports beyond what is offered in general education classrooms (Dettmer, Ettel, Glang, & McAvoy, 2014). Evidence-based instructional methods can help mitigate the academic and behavioural challenges associated with TBI (Ylvisaker et al., 2001). For example, cognitive strategy instructional approaches and Direct Instruction have substantial evidence bases and show preliminary evidence of efficacy with students with TBI (Glang et al., 2008). However, because of a pervasive lack of awareness of TBI among general educators, school teams need support in implementation of effective practices. Role of School Psychologists Because they lead the assessment and evaluation process in school settings, school psychologists need skills, knowledge, and training to accurately evaluate and meet the educational needs of students with TBI (Davies et al., 2013; Hooper, Walker, & Howard, 2001). Given their extensive training in the assessment, identification, and educational School Psychologists’ Knowledge of TBI Exceptionality Education International, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2 96 intervention of learning and behaviour problems, school psychologists are uniquely positioned to support students with TBI (Davies et al., 2013). As a key member of the educational team that supports students, school psychologists have an essential role and are often viewed as the gatekeepers responsible for identifying students who need support and for determining eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). School psychologists also provide guidance to educators about the services appropriate to meeting a student’s educational needs (Davies et al., 2013; Davies & Ray, 2014; Hooper, 2006). Surprisingly, multiple surveys of school psychologists indicate that they lack the training, knowledge, and skills the
学校心理学家治疗TBI学生的知识与自我效能感
大约145,000名美国儿童经历了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的持久影响,表现在学校环境中的社会,行为,身体和认知挑战。学校心理学家在确定需要支持的学生和根据《残疾人教育法》确定资格方面发挥着重要作用。本研究的目的是评估目前在公立学校工作的学校心理学家样本中与脑损伤相关的能力的知识和感知。我们调查了学校心理学家,发现与这些学生合作的知识水平和感知准备水平一直很低。与创伤性脑损伤学生打交道经验丰富的学校心理学家在履行学校心理学家几乎所有关键职责的感知能力方面,对自己的评价明显更高。为了满足创伤性脑损伤学生的学业和行为需求,所有学校心理学家都需要在治疗和评估创伤性脑损伤学生方面进行有效的培训。这项工作得到了国家残疾与康复研究所对辛辛那提儿童医院医学中心和俄勒冈大学的部分资助#H133B090010。作者感谢Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck和Jeff Gau在编写本文中的帮助。Glang, A. E., McCart, M., Moore, C. L., & Davies, S.(2018)学校心理学家在与TBI学生合作中的知识和自我效能。国际教育,27,94-109。检索自https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol27/iss2/5这篇文章开放获取后1年是由Scholarship@Western带给你的。它已被Scholarship@Western的授权管理员接受纳入例外教育国际。欲了解更多信息,请联系jspecht@uwo.ca。本研究得到了国家残疾与康复研究所向辛辛那提儿童医院医学中心和俄勒冈大学提供的#H133B090010基金的部分支持。作者感谢Elizabeth Backus, Laura Beck和Jeff Gau在编写本文中的帮助。这篇文章在1年后开放获取,可在卓越教育国际上找到:Ann E. Glang, Melissa McCart, & Christabelle L. Moore俄勒冈大学Susan Davies代顿大学摘要大约145,000名美国儿童经历了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的持久影响,表现在社会,行为,身体,以及学校环境中的认知挑战。学校心理学家在确定需要支持的学生和根据《残疾人教育法》确定资格方面发挥着重要作用。本研究的目的是评估目前在公立学校工作的学校心理学家样本中与脑损伤相关的能力的知识和感知。我们调查了学校心理学家,发现与这些学生合作的知识水平和感知准备水平一直很低。与创伤性脑损伤学生打交道经验丰富的学校心理学家在履行学校心理学家几乎所有关键职责的感知能力方面,对自己的评价明显更高。为了满足创伤性脑损伤学生的学业和行为需求,所有学校心理学家都需要在治疗和评估创伤性脑损伤学生方面进行有效的培训。大约145,000名美国儿童经历了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的持久影响,表现在学校环境中的社会,行为,身体和认知挑战。学校心理学家在确定需要支持的学生和根据《残疾人教育法》确定资格方面发挥着重要作用。本研究的目的是评估目前在公立学校工作的学校心理学家样本中与脑损伤相关的能力的知识和感知。我们调查了学校心理学家,发现与这些学生合作的知识水平和感知准备水平一直很低。与创伤性脑损伤学生打交道经验丰富的学校心理学家在履行学校心理学家几乎所有关键职责的感知能力方面,对自己的评价明显更高。为了满足创伤性脑损伤学生的学业和行为需求,所有学校心理学家都需要在治疗和评估创伤性脑损伤学生方面进行有效的培训。 创伤性脑损伤(tbi)是全球儿童死亡和残疾的主要原因(Faul, Xu, Wald, & Coronado, 2010)。美国疾病控制与预防中心估计,美国每年有6万名儿童因创伤性脑损伤住院;另有70万美国儿童因创伤性脑损伤相关症状而前往急诊室(Faul et al, 2010)。根据受伤时的初始症状,脑损伤通常分为轻度、中度或重度。大多数(70-90%)与脑外伤相关的急诊被认为是轻微的(Cassidy等人,2004;Faul et al., 2010)。儿童Glang, McCart, Moore, & Davies 95 Exceptionality Education International, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2严重受伤更有可能住院治疗,并经历更严重的残疾。中度和重度损伤的儿童可能有认知、行为和社交困难,影响他们的长期生活质量(Rivara, Vavilala等,2012);据估计,超过60%的中重度创伤性脑损伤儿童和14%的轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童患有残疾(Rivara, Koepsell等,2012)。总体而言,大约145,000名儿童经历了脑损伤的持久影响,表现在学校环境中的社交、行为、身体和认知挑战(Zaloshnja, Miller, Langlois, & Selassie, 2008)。脑损伤后,儿童面临影响学习成绩的多重挑战(Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2005;Gabbe et al., 2014;Hawley, 2004)。执行功能、记忆力、注意力、集中力和处理速度方面的挑战都会影响学校表现(gerard - morris et al., 2010;Ward, Magnay, & Mychalkiw, 2004;Moser, Schatz, & Jordan, 2005)。行为或心理症状、冲动、社会和情感问题在创伤性脑损伤后也很常见(Barlow et al., 2010;Li & Liu, 2013;Limond, Dorris, & McMillan, 2009;Ryan et al., 2016),会对学校表现产生负面影响。这一系列挑战可能会持续很长时间,导致长期学习成绩不佳(Babikian, Merkley, Savage, Giza, & Levin, 2015;Davies, Fox, Glang, Ettel, & Thomas, 2013;McKinlay, dalrymle - alford, Horwood, & Fergusson, 2002)。在7岁之前受伤的儿童比在童年后期受伤的儿童更容易出现显著的技能缺陷(Anderson & Moore, 1995)。此外,他们往往有较差的长期结果,而教育工作者并不将其归因于他们的伤害(Anderson, Catroppa, Morse, Haritou, & Rosenfeld, 2009;Schwartz et al., 2003)。Prasad, Swank, & Ewing-Cobbs(2016)在一项关于创伤性脑损伤儿童长期学业成绩的研究中发现,与创伤后2年相比,创伤后6年患有复杂轻度和中度损伤的儿童需要更多的支持。这一发现强调了学校团队跟踪和监测TBI学生的进步的必要性,这样他们就可以在出现困难时迅速做出反应,并提供适当的住宿或特殊教育服务(Prasad et al., 2016)。很大一部分TBI儿童需要普通教育课堂之外的干预或支持(Dettmer, Ettel, Glang, & McAvoy, 2014)。基于证据的教学方法可以帮助减轻与TBI相关的学术和行为挑战(Ylvisaker et al., 2001)。例如,认知策略教学方法和直接教学有充分的证据基础,并显示出对TBI学生有效的初步证据(Glang et al., 2008)。然而,由于普通教育工作者普遍缺乏对创伤性脑损伤的认识,学校团队需要在实施有效实践方面得到支持。学校心理学家的角色因为他们在学校环境中领导评估和评价过程,学校心理学家需要技能、知识和培训来准确评估和满足TBI学生的教育需求(Davies et al., 2013;Hooper, Walker, & Howard, 2001)。鉴于他们在评估、识别和教育学校心理学家的TBI知识方面的广泛培训,例外性教育国际,2017,Vol. 27, No. 2996学习和行为问题的干预,学校心理学家在支持TBI学生方面处于独特的地位(Davies et al., 2013)。作为支持学生的教育团队的关键成员,学校心理学家扮演着至关重要的角色,经常被视为负责识别需要支持的学生和根据《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)确定资格的看门人。学校心理学家还为教育工作者提供关于适合满足学生教育需求的服务的指导(Davies et al., 2013;Davies & Ray, 2014;Hooper, 2006)。 令人惊讶的是,对学校心理学家的多次调查表明,他们缺乏必要的训练、知识和技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信