The Impact of a School Board’s One-to-One iPad Initiative on Equity and Inclusion

Q4 Social Sciences
Lori C. Kirkpatrick, H. M. Brown, Michelle Searle, Adrienne E. Sauder, Eric Smiley
{"title":"The Impact of a School Board’s One-to-One iPad Initiative on Equity and Inclusion","authors":"Lori C. Kirkpatrick, H. M. Brown, Michelle Searle, Adrienne E. Sauder, Eric Smiley","doi":"10.5206/eei.v27i2.7751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of a school board’s one-to-one iPad initiative on equity and inclusion. Data include: questionnaires from Grade 7–9 students, teachers, and administrators; focus groups with inclusion coaches; and interviews with classroom teachers. The results show that the iPads have supported equity among students in the district; there is now less disparity in terms of access to technology on the basis of families’ socio-economic status. The results show that the iPads have also supported the academic and social inclusion of students with exceptionalities; themes that arose across the data sources include: differentiation of content, access to grade-level curriculum, the appearance of sameness, communication and collaboration among students with and without exceptionalities, and positive student affect. Negative implications included the potential for students who struggle with self-regulation to be negatively affected and the potential for the technology to be used in socially exclusionary ways. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 2653 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Accessibility Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, and the Special Education and","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i2.7751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of a school board’s one-to-one iPad initiative on equity and inclusion. Data include: questionnaires from Grade 7–9 students, teachers, and administrators; focus groups with inclusion coaches; and interviews with classroom teachers. The results show that the iPads have supported equity among students in the district; there is now less disparity in terms of access to technology on the basis of families’ socio-economic status. The results show that the iPads have also supported the academic and social inclusion of students with exceptionalities; themes that arose across the data sources include: differentiation of content, access to grade-level curriculum, the appearance of sameness, communication and collaboration among students with and without exceptionalities, and positive student affect. Negative implications included the potential for students who struggle with self-regulation to be negatively affected and the potential for the technology to be used in socially exclusionary ways. ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 2653 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei Part of the Accessibility Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, and the Special Education and
学校董事会一对一iPad计划对公平和包容的影响
本文考察了学校董事会一对一iPad计划对公平和包容的影响。数据包括:7-9年级学生、教师和管理人员的问卷调查;有包容性教练的焦点小组;以及对任课教师的采访。结果表明,ipad支持了该学区学生之间的公平;根据家庭的社会经济地位,在获得技术方面的差距现在有所缩小。结果表明,ipad对特殊学生的学业和社会包容也有支持作用;数据来源中出现的主题包括:内容的差异化、年级水平课程的获取、同一性的出现、有或没有例外情况的学生之间的沟通和合作,以及积极的学生影响。负面影响包括那些难以自我调节的学生可能受到负面影响,以及该技术可能被用于社会排斥的方式。关注本文和其他作品,请访问:https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei无障碍公共资源、教育心理学公共资源和特殊教育资源的一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信