Evaluation of low-cost methods for discharge measurements in rivers

Q3 Environmental Science
Luiz Henrique Maldonado, E. Wendland, R. Porto
{"title":"Evaluation of low-cost methods for discharge measurements in rivers","authors":"Luiz Henrique Maldonado, E. Wendland, R. Porto","doi":"10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.1293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing rates of pollution and over-exploitation have reduced the availability of water in many regions of the world. In this context, the qualitative and quantitative management of available water resources becomes paramount. Thus, this study evaluated the applicability of two low-cost discharge measurement methods that are adequately precise: the electromagnetic method and the culvert method. The methods were applied in the field (Ribeirao da Onca Basin) in order to assess their advantages and disadvantages with reference to the conventional method of discharge measurement. Compared with the traditional method, the electromagnetic method resulted in a deviation of -5%, but allowed velocity measurements in the turbulent conditions caused by the channel’s side walls. The culvert method resulted in discharge deviations of 2.1%; however, it had limitations in high water situations. The two low-cost methods showed good results in determining the rate of discharge, but it is crucial to understand their operational limitations.","PeriodicalId":38374,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ambiente e Agua","volume":"10 1","pages":"402-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ambiente e Agua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.1293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Increasing rates of pollution and over-exploitation have reduced the availability of water in many regions of the world. In this context, the qualitative and quantitative management of available water resources becomes paramount. Thus, this study evaluated the applicability of two low-cost discharge measurement methods that are adequately precise: the electromagnetic method and the culvert method. The methods were applied in the field (Ribeirao da Onca Basin) in order to assess their advantages and disadvantages with reference to the conventional method of discharge measurement. Compared with the traditional method, the electromagnetic method resulted in a deviation of -5%, but allowed velocity measurements in the turbulent conditions caused by the channel’s side walls. The culvert method resulted in discharge deviations of 2.1%; however, it had limitations in high water situations. The two low-cost methods showed good results in determining the rate of discharge, but it is crucial to understand their operational limitations.
低成本河流流量测量方法的评价
在世界许多地区,日益严重的污染和过度开发减少了水的供应。在这方面,现有水资源的质量和数量管理至关重要。因此,本研究评估了两种足够精确的低成本流量测量方法的适用性:电磁法和涵洞法。将这些方法应用于里贝罗达昂卡流域,并与传统的流量测量方法相比较,评价其优缺点。与传统方法相比,电磁方法的误差为-5%,但允许在通道侧壁引起的湍流条件下进行速度测量。涵洞法导致的流量偏差为2.1%;然而,它在高水位情况下有局限性。这两种低成本的方法在确定放电速率方面表现出良好的效果,但了解它们的操作局限性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Ambiente e Agua
Revista Ambiente e Agua Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信