Use of Propanolol versus Intralesional Bleomycin in the Management of Infantile Hemangioma: A Comparative Study.

Ali Raza Chaudhry, Mudassar Fiaz Gondal, Rashid Khan, Inayat Ur Rehman, Rumaisaa Saman, Khawar Abbas
{"title":"Use of Propanolol versus Intralesional Bleomycin in the Management of Infantile Hemangioma: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Ali Raza Chaudhry, Mudassar Fiaz Gondal, Rashid Khan, Inayat Ur Rehman, Rumaisaa Saman, Khawar Abbas","doi":"10.4103/ajps.ajps_55_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are widespread vascular tumours having incidence of 10% and most of them involute spontaneously. However, they are known to be located in proximity of vital organs and can have poor cosmetic and functional sequel if left untreated. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of oral propranolol and intraleisonal bleomycin in the treatment of infantile cutaneous haemangioma in terms of size regression.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>IH patients presenting in the outpatient department in PIMS were divided randomly by stratified random sampling in two groups. Out of 90 patients, 45 patients had treatment with oral propranolol and other 45 patients received intralesional bleomycin. Baseline size of haemangiomas was taken and regression in size was noted again at 3 and 6 months. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for the age and size of haemangioma in both groups. The mean size regression for both treatments was compared using independent t -test taking P < 0.05 as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 90 cases included in this study, the mean age of patients was 10.9 ± 6.1 months in Bleomycin group compared to 10.2 ± 6.9 months in propranolol group. The average size of haemangioma at baseline was 9.5 cm 2 in bleomycin group compared to 8.9 cm 2 in propranolol group. At 3 months after the intervention, the mean size regression was 3.5 cm 2 in bleomycin group compared to 5.3 cm 2 in propranolol group and after 6 months of treatment with bleomycin group the mean size of haemangioma was 0.45 cm 2 , whereas in the propranolol group, it was 2.8 cm 2 and difference in the two was found statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study concluded that treatment with intralesional injection Bleomycin for IHs helps in size reduction more efficiently with minimal side effects as compared to oral propranolol for comparable sized haemangiomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":72123,"journal":{"name":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","volume":"1 1","pages":"269-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_55_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are widespread vascular tumours having incidence of 10% and most of them involute spontaneously. However, they are known to be located in proximity of vital organs and can have poor cosmetic and functional sequel if left untreated. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of oral propranolol and intraleisonal bleomycin in the treatment of infantile cutaneous haemangioma in terms of size regression.

Materials and methods: IH patients presenting in the outpatient department in PIMS were divided randomly by stratified random sampling in two groups. Out of 90 patients, 45 patients had treatment with oral propranolol and other 45 patients received intralesional bleomycin. Baseline size of haemangiomas was taken and regression in size was noted again at 3 and 6 months. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for the age and size of haemangioma in both groups. The mean size regression for both treatments was compared using independent t -test taking P < 0.05 as significant.

Results: Out of 90 cases included in this study, the mean age of patients was 10.9 ± 6.1 months in Bleomycin group compared to 10.2 ± 6.9 months in propranolol group. The average size of haemangioma at baseline was 9.5 cm 2 in bleomycin group compared to 8.9 cm 2 in propranolol group. At 3 months after the intervention, the mean size regression was 3.5 cm 2 in bleomycin group compared to 5.3 cm 2 in propranolol group and after 6 months of treatment with bleomycin group the mean size of haemangioma was 0.45 cm 2 , whereas in the propranolol group, it was 2.8 cm 2 and difference in the two was found statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The present study concluded that treatment with intralesional injection Bleomycin for IHs helps in size reduction more efficiently with minimal side effects as compared to oral propranolol for comparable sized haemangiomas.

丙泊洛尔与局部布来霉素治疗婴幼儿血管瘤的比较研究。
背景:婴儿血管瘤(IHs)是一种广泛存在的血管瘤,发生率为10%,大多数是自发的。然而,众所周知,它们位于重要器官附近,如果不及时治疗,可能会造成不良的外观和功能后遗症。本研究的目的是评估口服心得安和内服博来霉素治疗婴儿皮肤血管瘤的疗效,以缩小血管瘤的大小。材料与方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法,将在PIMS门诊就诊的IH患者随机分为两组。90例患者中45例口服心得安,45例病灶内应用博来霉素。测量血管瘤的基线大小,并在3个月和6个月时再次观察到血管瘤大小的下降。计算两组患者的年龄和血管瘤大小的平均值和标准差。两种处理的平均大小回归采用独立t检验,P < 0.05为显著性。结果:90例患者中,博莱霉素组患者平均年龄为10.9±6.1个月,心得安组患者平均年龄为10.2±6.9个月。博莱霉素组基线时血管瘤平均大小为9.5 cm 2,而心得安组基线时血管瘤平均大小为8.9 cm 2。干预后3个月,博来霉素组平均血管瘤大小回归为3.5 cm 2,而普萘洛尔组平均血管瘤大小回归为5.3 cm 2,博来霉素组治疗6个月后血管瘤大小回归为0.45 cm 2,而普萘洛尔组平均血管瘤大小回归为2.8 cm 2,两者差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:目前的研究表明,与口服心得安相比,病灶内注射博来霉素治疗血管瘤可以更有效地缩小血管瘤的大小,而且副作用最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书