An Inconsistency in Using Stock Flow Consistency in Modelling the Monetary Profit Paradox

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
M. R. de la Fonteijne
{"title":"An Inconsistency in Using Stock Flow Consistency in Modelling the Monetary Profit Paradox","authors":"M. R. de la Fonteijne","doi":"10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to understand the sources of profits or monetary profits of capitalists and firms, the author examines the phrase of Marx: ‘Die Gesamtklasse der Kapitalisten kann nichts aus der Zirkulation herausziehen, was nicht vorher hineingeworfen war.’ (The class of capitalists cannot extract from the circulation what has not previously been thrown in.) Steve Keen studied the monetary paradox and contrary to circuitists he came to the conclusion that capitalists can make a monetary profit with the possibility to earn enough to repay their debt, with positive balances for all actors. The author demonstrates that Keen made a fundamental mistake and is using the Stock Flow Consistency Principle in an inconsistent way by combining it with behavioral equations in a dynamic model. The solution presented here shows not only problems with the numbers but with the method. This solution resolves a dispute between Keen and circuitists and implies that, in a Wicksellian pure credit economy, it remains impossible for all actors to gain a monetary profit.","PeriodicalId":53338,"journal":{"name":"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-15","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In order to understand the sources of profits or monetary profits of capitalists and firms, the author examines the phrase of Marx: ‘Die Gesamtklasse der Kapitalisten kann nichts aus der Zirkulation herausziehen, was nicht vorher hineingeworfen war.’ (The class of capitalists cannot extract from the circulation what has not previously been thrown in.) Steve Keen studied the monetary paradox and contrary to circuitists he came to the conclusion that capitalists can make a monetary profit with the possibility to earn enough to repay their debt, with positive balances for all actors. The author demonstrates that Keen made a fundamental mistake and is using the Stock Flow Consistency Principle in an inconsistent way by combining it with behavioral equations in a dynamic model. The solution presented here shows not only problems with the numbers but with the method. This solution resolves a dispute between Keen and circuitists and implies that, in a Wicksellian pure credit economy, it remains impossible for all actors to gain a monetary profit.
用库存流量一致性建模货币利润悖论的不一致
摘要:为了理解资本家和企业的利润或货币利润的来源,笔者考察了马克思的一句话:“资本主义的起源”(Die Gesamtklasse der Kapitalisten kannnightsaus der Zirkulation herausziehen),即“工人战争的起源”。(资本家阶级不能从流通中榨取以前没有投入的东西。)史蒂夫·基恩(Steve Keen)研究了货币悖论,与电路主义者相反,他得出的结论是,资本家可以赚取货币利润,有可能赚到足够的钱来偿还债务,所有参与者都有正的余额。作者证明了Keen犯了一个根本性的错误,他将库存流量一致性原理与动态模型中的行为方程结合起来,以一种不一致的方式使用了它。这里提出的解决方案不仅显示了数字上的问题,而且显示了方法上的问题。这个解决方案解决了基恩和电路主义者之间的争议,并暗示,在威克塞尔式的纯信用经济中,所有参与者都获得货币利润仍然是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal
Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信