sbv IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge

K. Rhrissorrakrai, John Rice, S. Boué, M. Talikka, E. Bilal, F. Martin, Pablo Meyer, R. Norel, Yang Xiang, G. Stolovitzky, J. Hoeng, M. Peitsch
{"title":"sbv IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge","authors":"K. Rhrissorrakrai, John Rice, S. Boué, M. Talikka, E. Bilal, F. Martin, Pablo Meyer, R. Norel, Yang Xiang, G. Stolovitzky, J. Hoeng, M. Peitsch","doi":"10.4161/sysb.26325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sbv IMPROVER (systems biology verification—Industrial Methodology for Process Verification in Research) process aims to help companies verify component steps or tasks in larger research workflows for industrial applications. IMPROVER is built on challenges posed to the community that draws on the wisdom of crowds to assess the most suitable methods for a given research task. The Diagnostic Signature Challenge, open to the public from Mar. 5 to Jun. 21, 2012, was the first instantiation of the IMPROVER methodology and evaluated a fundamental biological question, specifically, if there is sufficient information in gene expression data to diagnose diseases. Fifty-four teams used publically available data to develop prediction models in four disease areas: multiple sclerosis, lung cancer, psoriasis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The predictions were scored against unpublished, blinded data provided by the organizers, and the results, including methods of the top performers, presented at a conference in Boston on Oct. 2–3, 2012. This paper offers an overview of the Diagnostic Signature Challenge and the accompanying symposium, and is the first article in a special issue of Systems Biomedicine, providing focused reviews of the submitted methods and general conclusions from the challenge. Overall, it was observed that optimal method choice and performance appeared largely dependent on endpoint, and results indicate the psoriasis and lung cancer subtypes sub-challenges were more accurately predicted, while the remaining classification tasks were much more challenging. Though no one approach was superior for every sub-challenge, there were methods, like linear discriminant analysis, that were found to perform consistently well in all.","PeriodicalId":90057,"journal":{"name":"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"196 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/sysb.26325","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems biomedicine (Austin, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/sysb.26325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The sbv IMPROVER (systems biology verification—Industrial Methodology for Process Verification in Research) process aims to help companies verify component steps or tasks in larger research workflows for industrial applications. IMPROVER is built on challenges posed to the community that draws on the wisdom of crowds to assess the most suitable methods for a given research task. The Diagnostic Signature Challenge, open to the public from Mar. 5 to Jun. 21, 2012, was the first instantiation of the IMPROVER methodology and evaluated a fundamental biological question, specifically, if there is sufficient information in gene expression data to diagnose diseases. Fifty-four teams used publically available data to develop prediction models in four disease areas: multiple sclerosis, lung cancer, psoriasis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The predictions were scored against unpublished, blinded data provided by the organizers, and the results, including methods of the top performers, presented at a conference in Boston on Oct. 2–3, 2012. This paper offers an overview of the Diagnostic Signature Challenge and the accompanying symposium, and is the first article in a special issue of Systems Biomedicine, providing focused reviews of the submitted methods and general conclusions from the challenge. Overall, it was observed that optimal method choice and performance appeared largely dependent on endpoint, and results indicate the psoriasis and lung cancer subtypes sub-challenges were more accurately predicted, while the remaining classification tasks were much more challenging. Though no one approach was superior for every sub-challenge, there were methods, like linear discriminant analysis, that were found to perform consistently well in all.
sbv improved诊断签名挑战
sbv IMPROVER(系统生物学验证-研究过程验证的工业方法)过程旨在帮助公司在工业应用的大型研究工作流程中验证组件步骤或任务。IMPROVER是建立在对社区提出的挑战上的,它利用人群的智慧来评估最适合特定研究任务的方法。诊断签名挑战赛于2012年3月5日至6月21日向公众开放,是首次使用IMPROVER方法,评估一个基本的生物学问题,特别是基因表达数据中是否有足够的信息来诊断疾病。54个团队利用公开数据开发了四个疾病领域的预测模型:多发性硬化症、肺癌、牛皮癣和慢性阻塞性肺病。这些预测是根据组织者提供的未发表的盲法数据进行评分的,结果在2012年10月2日至3日波士顿的一次会议上公布,其中包括表现最佳的方法。本文概述了诊断签名挑战和伴随的研讨会,是《系统生物医学》特刊上的第一篇文章,重点综述了提交的方法和来自挑战的一般结论。总体而言,观察到最佳方法选择和性能在很大程度上依赖于终点,结果表明银屑病和肺癌亚型的亚挑战预测更准确,而其余分类任务更具挑战性。虽然没有一种方法对每个子挑战都是优越的,但有一些方法,如线性判别分析,被发现在所有子挑战中都表现得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信