K. Takarinda, S. Nyadundu, Emmanuel Govha, N. Gombe, T. Juru, Tshimanga Mufuta
{"title":"Evaluation of the HIV Case-Based Surveillance System: A Pilot of the Electronic Health Record System in Mutare District, Zimbabwe, 2021","authors":"K. Takarinda, S. Nyadundu, Emmanuel Govha, N. Gombe, T. Juru, Tshimanga Mufuta","doi":"10.4236/ojepi.2021.114039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Zimbabwe started HIV case-based surveillance in April 2017. Rapid testing for HIV recent infection was introduced into routine HIV and testing services in 2019 along with the Impilo Electronic Health Record System. For the period January-June 2020, only 1 out of 13 health facilities in Mutare district reported seven newly diagnosed HIV patients through the electronic health record system compared to 483 in the District Health Information System (DHIS-2) recorded from paper-based registers. We evaluated the case-based surveillance system attributes, usefulness and reasons for under-re-porting from January-December 2020. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using updated Centres for Disease Control guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Questionnaires were admi-nistered to 36 health workers involved in HIV testing services. Facility check-lists were used to collect data on knowledge, system attributes and usefulness of the system. Completed HIV case-based surveillance forms were assessed for completeness. Epi Info Version 7 was used to generate frequencies, means and proportions. Results: The reasons for under-reporting of patients in the electronic health record system were lack of reporting guidelines 26/36 (72%), limited coordination between technical staff and health facilities 24/36 (67%) and limited competency Quarter-4 of 2020. Acceptability was 100% due to reduced paperwork and the ability to generate simple reports. The information generated was used to identify new infection hotspots 28/36 (78%). Conclusion: The HIV cases based surveillance system was timely, acceptable with good data quality. Representativeness was poor due to limited competency on the electronic health record system. As a result, health workers received further training.","PeriodicalId":71174,"journal":{"name":"流行病学期刊(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"流行病学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2021.114039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Zimbabwe started HIV case-based surveillance in April 2017. Rapid testing for HIV recent infection was introduced into routine HIV and testing services in 2019 along with the Impilo Electronic Health Record System. For the period January-June 2020, only 1 out of 13 health facilities in Mutare district reported seven newly diagnosed HIV patients through the electronic health record system compared to 483 in the District Health Information System (DHIS-2) recorded from paper-based registers. We evaluated the case-based surveillance system attributes, usefulness and reasons for under-re-porting from January-December 2020. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using updated Centres for Disease Control guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Questionnaires were admi-nistered to 36 health workers involved in HIV testing services. Facility check-lists were used to collect data on knowledge, system attributes and usefulness of the system. Completed HIV case-based surveillance forms were assessed for completeness. Epi Info Version 7 was used to generate frequencies, means and proportions. Results: The reasons for under-reporting of patients in the electronic health record system were lack of reporting guidelines 26/36 (72%), limited coordination between technical staff and health facilities 24/36 (67%) and limited competency Quarter-4 of 2020. Acceptability was 100% due to reduced paperwork and the ability to generate simple reports. The information generated was used to identify new infection hotspots 28/36 (78%). Conclusion: The HIV cases based surveillance system was timely, acceptable with good data quality. Representativeness was poor due to limited competency on the electronic health record system. As a result, health workers received further training.
背景:津巴布韦于2017年4月启动了基于病例的艾滋病毒监测。2019年,与Impilo电子健康记录系统一起,将对近期感染艾滋病毒的快速检测引入常规艾滋病毒和检测服务。在2020年1月至6月期间,穆塔雷区13个卫生机构中只有1个通过电子健康记录系统报告了7名新诊断的艾滋病毒患者,而地区卫生信息系统(DHIS-2)通过纸质登记记录了483名患者。我们评估了2020年1月至12月以病例为基础的监测系统的属性、有效性和低报的原因。方法:我们使用最新的疾病控制中心评估公共卫生监测系统指南进行了一项描述性横断面研究。向参与艾滋病毒检测服务的36名卫生工作者发放了问卷。设施检查表用于收集有关系统知识、系统属性和系统有用性的数据。对已填写的基于艾滋病毒病例的监测表格的完整性进行了评估。Epi Info Version 7用于生成频率、平均值和比例。结果:2020年第4季度,患者在电子病历系统中漏报的原因是缺乏报告指南(26/36)(72%)、技术人员与卫生机构之间的协调有限(24/36)(67%)和能力有限。由于减少了文书工作和生成简单报告的能力,可接受性为100%。所产生的信息用于确定新的感染热点28/36(78%)。结论:基于病例的监测系统及时、可接受,数据质量好。由于电子病历系统的能力有限,代表性较差。因此,卫生工作者得到了进一步的培训。