Book review. Reproductive and genetic responsibility: whose burden? : Ivett Szalma: Attitudes, norms, and beliefs related to assisted reproduction technologies among childless women in a pronatalist society

Q3 Social Sciences
Bauer Zsófia
{"title":"Book review. Reproductive and genetic responsibility: whose burden? : Ivett Szalma: Attitudes, norms, and beliefs related to assisted reproduction technologies among childless women in a pronatalist society","authors":"Bauer Zsófia","doi":"10.51624/szocszemle.2021.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ivett Szalma (Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence and Corvinus University of Budapest) has in the last decade established herself as one of the key researchers in the Hungarian and international sociological community who is taking on the task of understanding public attitudes towards childlessness, infertility, and assisted reproduction technologies (ART). The present book fits seamlessly into her area of expertise on the statistical analysis of public attitudes towards ART, but also expands on her former quantitative focus and takes on an investigation of the topic through in-depth qualitative inquiry. Thus, the research built upon in the publication draws on the findings of other relevant work of Szalma’s, yet introduces the topic from a new methodological standpoint. To achieve a new level of understanding of social attitudes to medically assisted reproduction, Szalma adapts not merely one qualitative approach, but ventures into the topic with a multi-method qualitative research design. The combination of in-depth interviews and focus groups has been gaining ground in the qualitative research community recently. The choice to sample childless women allows for a unique, more focused investigation of ART that generates an understanding of the attitudes of its potential users.","PeriodicalId":52512,"journal":{"name":"Szociologiai Szemle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Szociologiai Szemle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51624/szocszemle.2021.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ivett Szalma (Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence and Corvinus University of Budapest) has in the last decade established herself as one of the key researchers in the Hungarian and international sociological community who is taking on the task of understanding public attitudes towards childlessness, infertility, and assisted reproduction technologies (ART). The present book fits seamlessly into her area of expertise on the statistical analysis of public attitudes towards ART, but also expands on her former quantitative focus and takes on an investigation of the topic through in-depth qualitative inquiry. Thus, the research built upon in the publication draws on the findings of other relevant work of Szalma’s, yet introduces the topic from a new methodological standpoint. To achieve a new level of understanding of social attitudes to medically assisted reproduction, Szalma adapts not merely one qualitative approach, but ventures into the topic with a multi-method qualitative research design. The combination of in-depth interviews and focus groups has been gaining ground in the qualitative research community recently. The choice to sample childless women allows for a unique, more focused investigation of ART that generates an understanding of the attitudes of its potential users.
书评。生殖和遗传责任:谁的负担?Ivett Szalma:在一个亲生主义社会中,无子女妇女对辅助生殖技术的态度、规范和信仰
Ivett Szalma(匈牙利科学院卓越中心和布达佩斯科维努斯大学社会科学中心)在过去十年中成为匈牙利和国际社会学界的主要研究人员之一,她承担着理解公众对无子女、不孕症和辅助生殖技术(ART)的态度的任务。这本书与她在公众对ART态度的统计分析方面的专业领域完美契合,但也扩展了她以前的定量关注,并通过深入的定性调查对该主题进行了调查。因此,在出版物中建立的研究借鉴了Szalma的其他相关工作的发现,但从新的方法论角度介绍了这个主题。为了更好地理解社会对医学辅助生殖的态度,Szalma不仅采用了一种定性方法,而且采用了一种多方法定性研究设计。深度访谈和焦点小组的结合最近在定性研究界获得了进展。选择无子女妇女作为样本,可以对抗逆转录病毒治疗进行独特、更有针对性的调查,从而了解其潜在使用者的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Szociologiai Szemle
Szociologiai Szemle Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信