M. Lance, T. Toops, Melanie Moses-DeBusk, B. Kaul, C. Lambert, Xin Liu, H. Luo, J. Qu, Ryan Rieth, A. Ritchie, S. Huff, M. Maricq, D. Dobson, A. Gangopadhyay, T. Chanko
{"title":"Investigation of Lubricant Additive Interactions on Gasoline\n Particulate Filters","authors":"M. Lance, T. Toops, Melanie Moses-DeBusk, B. Kaul, C. Lambert, Xin Liu, H. Luo, J. Qu, Ryan Rieth, A. Ritchie, S. Huff, M. Maricq, D. Dobson, A. Gangopadhyay, T. Chanko","doi":"10.4271/04-16-03-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand how the composition of novel lubricant additives and their ash\n interact with gasoline particulate filters (GPFs), an accelerated aging protocol\n was conducted using three lubricant additive formulations and two GPF types. The\n additive packages (adpaks) consisted of Ca+Mg detergent in a 3:1 or 0:1 ratio\n and an anti-wear component—either zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate (ZDDP) or a novel\n phosphonium-phosphinate ionic liquid (IL) substitute. The particulate sampling\n captured amount/compositions of particulate matter (PM) generated, total\n particulate number, and size distribution. Five ash loadings were completed. GPF\n position and adpak composition affected the backpressure, ash composition, ash\n morphology, and captured mass. The particulate sampling indicated that the ash\n component consisted primarily of particles less than 50 nm in size and that the\n Mg-only adpak resulted in more particulate of 50–400 nm in size. Postmortem\n materials characterization indicated GPFs in the underfloor position had deeper\n penetration of ash into the walls compared to the close-coupled position.\n Additionally, the Mg-only adpak had a higher filter collection efficiency\n (>90%) and the ash particles consisted of a higher concentration of dense ash\n material. In contrast, four of the 3:1 Ca:Mg lubricant adpaks resulted in a\n collection efficiency of only 40–50%. Although the collection efficiency was\n higher with the Mg-only adpak, the ash layer in the GPF was not thicker, nor was\n the penetration into the wall more significant, and surprisingly the full useful\n life (FUL) backpressure was lower than with Ca:Mg adpaks. The higher density of\n the Mg-derived ash was the only detectable difference. A possible explanation of\n this observation is that Mg ash has a lower melting point and is more\n susceptible to densification during combustion or GPF regeneration. The\n substitution of IL in place of the ZDDP did not lead to any notable changes in\n collection efficiency or location of the ash.","PeriodicalId":21365,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/04-16-03-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
To understand how the composition of novel lubricant additives and their ash
interact with gasoline particulate filters (GPFs), an accelerated aging protocol
was conducted using three lubricant additive formulations and two GPF types. The
additive packages (adpaks) consisted of Ca+Mg detergent in a 3:1 or 0:1 ratio
and an anti-wear component—either zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate (ZDDP) or a novel
phosphonium-phosphinate ionic liquid (IL) substitute. The particulate sampling
captured amount/compositions of particulate matter (PM) generated, total
particulate number, and size distribution. Five ash loadings were completed. GPF
position and adpak composition affected the backpressure, ash composition, ash
morphology, and captured mass. The particulate sampling indicated that the ash
component consisted primarily of particles less than 50 nm in size and that the
Mg-only adpak resulted in more particulate of 50–400 nm in size. Postmortem
materials characterization indicated GPFs in the underfloor position had deeper
penetration of ash into the walls compared to the close-coupled position.
Additionally, the Mg-only adpak had a higher filter collection efficiency
(>90%) and the ash particles consisted of a higher concentration of dense ash
material. In contrast, four of the 3:1 Ca:Mg lubricant adpaks resulted in a
collection efficiency of only 40–50%. Although the collection efficiency was
higher with the Mg-only adpak, the ash layer in the GPF was not thicker, nor was
the penetration into the wall more significant, and surprisingly the full useful
life (FUL) backpressure was lower than with Ca:Mg adpaks. The higher density of
the Mg-derived ash was the only detectable difference. A possible explanation of
this observation is that Mg ash has a lower melting point and is more
susceptible to densification during combustion or GPF regeneration. The
substitution of IL in place of the ZDDP did not lead to any notable changes in
collection efficiency or location of the ash.