Investigation of Lubricant Additive Interactions on Gasoline Particulate Filters

IF 1 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
M. Lance, T. Toops, Melanie Moses-DeBusk, B. Kaul, C. Lambert, Xin Liu, H. Luo, J. Qu, Ryan Rieth, A. Ritchie, S. Huff, M. Maricq, D. Dobson, A. Gangopadhyay, T. Chanko
{"title":"Investigation of Lubricant Additive Interactions on Gasoline\n Particulate Filters","authors":"M. Lance, T. Toops, Melanie Moses-DeBusk, B. Kaul, C. Lambert, Xin Liu, H. Luo, J. Qu, Ryan Rieth, A. Ritchie, S. Huff, M. Maricq, D. Dobson, A. Gangopadhyay, T. Chanko","doi":"10.4271/04-16-03-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand how the composition of novel lubricant additives and their ash\n interact with gasoline particulate filters (GPFs), an accelerated aging protocol\n was conducted using three lubricant additive formulations and two GPF types. The\n additive packages (adpaks) consisted of Ca+Mg detergent in a 3:1 or 0:1 ratio\n and an anti-wear component—either zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate (ZDDP) or a novel\n phosphonium-phosphinate ionic liquid (IL) substitute. The particulate sampling\n captured amount/compositions of particulate matter (PM) generated, total\n particulate number, and size distribution. Five ash loadings were completed. GPF\n position and adpak composition affected the backpressure, ash composition, ash\n morphology, and captured mass. The particulate sampling indicated that the ash\n component consisted primarily of particles less than 50 nm in size and that the\n Mg-only adpak resulted in more particulate of 50–400 nm in size. Postmortem\n materials characterization indicated GPFs in the underfloor position had deeper\n penetration of ash into the walls compared to the close-coupled position.\n Additionally, the Mg-only adpak had a higher filter collection efficiency\n (>90%) and the ash particles consisted of a higher concentration of dense ash\n material. In contrast, four of the 3:1 Ca:Mg lubricant adpaks resulted in a\n collection efficiency of only 40–50%. Although the collection efficiency was\n higher with the Mg-only adpak, the ash layer in the GPF was not thicker, nor was\n the penetration into the wall more significant, and surprisingly the full useful\n life (FUL) backpressure was lower than with Ca:Mg adpaks. The higher density of\n the Mg-derived ash was the only detectable difference. A possible explanation of\n this observation is that Mg ash has a lower melting point and is more\n susceptible to densification during combustion or GPF regeneration. The\n substitution of IL in place of the ZDDP did not lead to any notable changes in\n collection efficiency or location of the ash.","PeriodicalId":21365,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/04-16-03-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To understand how the composition of novel lubricant additives and their ash interact with gasoline particulate filters (GPFs), an accelerated aging protocol was conducted using three lubricant additive formulations and two GPF types. The additive packages (adpaks) consisted of Ca+Mg detergent in a 3:1 or 0:1 ratio and an anti-wear component—either zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate (ZDDP) or a novel phosphonium-phosphinate ionic liquid (IL) substitute. The particulate sampling captured amount/compositions of particulate matter (PM) generated, total particulate number, and size distribution. Five ash loadings were completed. GPF position and adpak composition affected the backpressure, ash composition, ash morphology, and captured mass. The particulate sampling indicated that the ash component consisted primarily of particles less than 50 nm in size and that the Mg-only adpak resulted in more particulate of 50–400 nm in size. Postmortem materials characterization indicated GPFs in the underfloor position had deeper penetration of ash into the walls compared to the close-coupled position. Additionally, the Mg-only adpak had a higher filter collection efficiency (>90%) and the ash particles consisted of a higher concentration of dense ash material. In contrast, four of the 3:1 Ca:Mg lubricant adpaks resulted in a collection efficiency of only 40–50%. Although the collection efficiency was higher with the Mg-only adpak, the ash layer in the GPF was not thicker, nor was the penetration into the wall more significant, and surprisingly the full useful life (FUL) backpressure was lower than with Ca:Mg adpaks. The higher density of the Mg-derived ash was the only detectable difference. A possible explanation of this observation is that Mg ash has a lower melting point and is more susceptible to densification during combustion or GPF regeneration. The substitution of IL in place of the ZDDP did not lead to any notable changes in collection efficiency or location of the ash.
润滑油添加剂与汽油微粒过滤器相互作用的研究
为了了解新型润滑油添加剂的组成及其灰分如何与汽油颗粒过滤器(GPF)相互作用,研究人员使用三种润滑油添加剂配方和两种GPF类型进行了加速老化试验。添加剂包(adpaks)由Ca+Mg洗涤剂以3:1或0:1的比例和抗磨成分组成-二烷基二硫代磷酸锌(ZDDP)或新型磷酸膦离子液体(IL)替代品。颗粒采样捕获的颗粒物质(PM)产生的数量/组成,总颗粒数和大小分布。完成了5次装灰。GPF位置和adpak组成影响背压、灰分组成、灰分形态和捕获质量。颗粒取样表明,灰分成分主要由粒径小于50 nm的颗粒组成,而Mg-only adpak导致更多粒径为50 - 400 nm的颗粒。死后材料表征表明,与紧密耦合的位置相比,在地板下位置的GPFs有更深的灰渗透到墙壁中。此外,Mg-only adpak具有更高的过滤收集效率(约90%),并且灰颗粒由更高浓度的致密灰物质组成。相比之下,4种3:1 Ca:Mg润滑油包的收集效率仅为40-50%。虽然纯镁adpak的收集效率更高,但GPF中的灰层并不厚,对壁面的渗透也不明显,并且令人惊讶的是,满使用寿命(full - useful life, FUL)背压低于Ca:Mg adpak。唯一可检测到的不同之处是镁衍生灰烬的密度更高。对这一现象的一个可能解释是,镁灰熔点较低,在燃烧或GPF再生过程中更容易致密化。用IL代替ZDDP并没有导致收集效率或灰的位置发生任何显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信