Decreased Key Pecking in Response to Reward Uncertainty and Surprising Delay Extension in Pigeons

Q3 Psychology
Neslihan Wittek, Kevin Wittek, O. Güntürkün, Patrick Anselme
{"title":"Decreased Key Pecking in Response to Reward Uncertainty and Surprising Delay Extension in Pigeons","authors":"Neslihan Wittek, Kevin Wittek, O. Güntürkün, Patrick Anselme","doi":"10.46867/IJCP.2021.34.00.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Wittek, Neslihan; Wittek, Kevin; Gunturkun, Onur; Anselme, Patrick | Abstract: The Pavlovian autoshaping paradigm has often been used to assess the behavioral effects of reward omission on behavior. We trained pigeons to receive a food reward (unconditioned stimulus or UCS) following illumination of a response key (conditioned stimulus or CS). In Experiment 1, one group of pigeons was trained with two 100% predictive CS-UCS associations (reward certainty) and another group with two 25% predictive CS-UCS associations (reward uncertainty) for 12 sessions. In both groups, the two CS durations were 8 s. Then, in each group, the duration of one CS remained unchanged and that of the other CS was suddenly extended from 8 to 24 s for 6 sessions. In Experiment 2, some experienced individuals (from Experiment 1) and naive individuals formed two groups trained with a 24-s CS throughout for 18 sessions. Our results show that pigeons (a) pecked less at the uncertain than the certain CS, (b) decreased and then increased CS-pecking after extending CS duration, especially in the certainty condition, (c) were unresponsive to the 24-s CS in the absence of previous experience, and (d) decreased their response rate close to the end of a trial irrespective of the reinforcement condition, CS duration, and amount of training. These results are discussed in relation to several theoretical frameworks.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46867/IJCP.2021.34.00.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Author(s): Wittek, Neslihan; Wittek, Kevin; Gunturkun, Onur; Anselme, Patrick | Abstract: The Pavlovian autoshaping paradigm has often been used to assess the behavioral effects of reward omission on behavior. We trained pigeons to receive a food reward (unconditioned stimulus or UCS) following illumination of a response key (conditioned stimulus or CS). In Experiment 1, one group of pigeons was trained with two 100% predictive CS-UCS associations (reward certainty) and another group with two 25% predictive CS-UCS associations (reward uncertainty) for 12 sessions. In both groups, the two CS durations were 8 s. Then, in each group, the duration of one CS remained unchanged and that of the other CS was suddenly extended from 8 to 24 s for 6 sessions. In Experiment 2, some experienced individuals (from Experiment 1) and naive individuals formed two groups trained with a 24-s CS throughout for 18 sessions. Our results show that pigeons (a) pecked less at the uncertain than the certain CS, (b) decreased and then increased CS-pecking after extending CS duration, especially in the certainty condition, (c) were unresponsive to the 24-s CS in the absence of previous experience, and (d) decreased their response rate close to the end of a trial irrespective of the reinforcement condition, CS duration, and amount of training. These results are discussed in relation to several theoretical frameworks.
鸽子对奖励不确定性和意外延迟扩展的反应减少了啄键
作者:Wittek, Neslihan;凯文Wittek;Gunturkun偏向;摘要巴甫洛夫自塑造范式经常被用来评估奖励遗漏对行为的影响。我们训练鸽子在反应键(条件刺激或CS)照亮后接受食物奖励(无条件刺激或UCS)。在实验1中,一组鸽子用两个100%预测的CS-UCS关联(奖励确定性)和另一组鸽子用两个25%预测的CS-UCS关联(奖励不确定性)进行12次训练。两组CS持续时间均为8 s。然后,在每组中,一个CS的持续时间保持不变,另一个CS的持续时间突然从8 s延长到24 s,共6次。在实验2中,一些经验丰富的个体(来自实验1)和幼稚的个体组成两组,在18个阶段中进行24-s CS训练。结果表明:(a)在不确定条件下,鸽子的啄食次数少于确定条件下的啄食次数;(b)在确定条件下,延长啄食时间后,鸽子的啄食次数先减少后增加;(c)在没有经验的情况下,鸽子对24秒的啄食没有反应;(d)在接近试验结束时,无论强化条件、CS持续时间和训练量如何,鸽子的反应率都有所下降。这些结果与几个理论框架有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信