A Clinical Audit of Colonoscopy in a Gastroenterology Unit at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in South Africa

Q4 Medicine
A. Mahomed, E. Cremona, C. Fourie, Lifa Dhlamini, Michael Klos, Thokozani Ntshalintshali, Sagar Patel, S. Shabangu, M. Shongwe, Sandhia Singh, Natalie Irwin, K. Moeng
{"title":"A Clinical Audit of Colonoscopy in a Gastroenterology Unit at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in South Africa","authors":"A. Mahomed, E. Cremona, C. Fourie, Lifa Dhlamini, Michael Klos, Thokozani Ntshalintshali, Sagar Patel, S. Shabangu, M. Shongwe, Sandhia Singh, Natalie Irwin, K. Moeng","doi":"10.4314/SAGR.V10I3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Colonoscopy is a valuable tool for diagnosing various colonic pathologies. There is little recent research regarding the use of colonoscopy in South Africa.\nObjective : To describe the findings of the audit done on the practice of colonoscopy in a specialised gastroenterology unit (GEU) of a tertiary teaching hospital.\nDesign : A retrospective audit of colonoscopies performed between the 01 January 2008 and 31 March 2010 in a single gastroenterology unit at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital(CMJAH) was conducted. Details of colonoscopy records were obtained from an administrative database of patient files. No patient specific inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied.\nResults : In total 1143 colonoscopies were performed during the study period, and 989 were analysed. The mean age was 63.04 years (10 - 93), 61.58% female, 61.48% were Caucasians and 25.88% were of black ethnicity. The indications for colonoscopies were; screening for colorectal cancer (22.95%), case findings (14.16%) and surveillance (14.96%). Caecal intubation rate (CIR) was 80.08%. Findings included macroscopically normal colons (38.12%), polyps (28.18%) and diverticular disease (23.15%). Of the biopsies obtained during colonoscopy procedures 30.50% were reported as normal colonic mucosa, 10.40% revealed adenocarcinoma and 55.37% were tubular adenomas.\nConclusions : The audit identified a number of shortfalls, which include: poor colonoscopy performance quality as reflected by the low CIR, non standardised colonoscopy reporting format resulting in paucity of information on scope reports, under-representation of the black community, to mention a few. It therefore would appear, based on the findings from this study that there is room for improvement in a number of areas in the practice of colonoscopy in this unit. Further studies may be of value to identify reasons behind these shortfalls.","PeriodicalId":39144,"journal":{"name":"South African Gastroenterology Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Gastroenterology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAGR.V10I3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background : Colonoscopy is a valuable tool for diagnosing various colonic pathologies. There is little recent research regarding the use of colonoscopy in South Africa. Objective : To describe the findings of the audit done on the practice of colonoscopy in a specialised gastroenterology unit (GEU) of a tertiary teaching hospital. Design : A retrospective audit of colonoscopies performed between the 01 January 2008 and 31 March 2010 in a single gastroenterology unit at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital(CMJAH) was conducted. Details of colonoscopy records were obtained from an administrative database of patient files. No patient specific inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied. Results : In total 1143 colonoscopies were performed during the study period, and 989 were analysed. The mean age was 63.04 years (10 - 93), 61.58% female, 61.48% were Caucasians and 25.88% were of black ethnicity. The indications for colonoscopies were; screening for colorectal cancer (22.95%), case findings (14.16%) and surveillance (14.96%). Caecal intubation rate (CIR) was 80.08%. Findings included macroscopically normal colons (38.12%), polyps (28.18%) and diverticular disease (23.15%). Of the biopsies obtained during colonoscopy procedures 30.50% were reported as normal colonic mucosa, 10.40% revealed adenocarcinoma and 55.37% were tubular adenomas. Conclusions : The audit identified a number of shortfalls, which include: poor colonoscopy performance quality as reflected by the low CIR, non standardised colonoscopy reporting format resulting in paucity of information on scope reports, under-representation of the black community, to mention a few. It therefore would appear, based on the findings from this study that there is room for improvement in a number of areas in the practice of colonoscopy in this unit. Further studies may be of value to identify reasons behind these shortfalls.
南非一家三级教学医院消化科结肠镜检查的临床审计
背景:结肠镜检查是诊断各种结肠病变的重要工具。最近关于南非结肠镜检查使用的研究很少。目的:描述对某三级教学医院消化科专科(GEU)结肠镜检查实践的审计结果。设计:对2008年1月1日至2010年3月31日期间在Charlotte Maxeke约翰内斯堡学术医院(CMJAH)的一个胃肠科进行的结肠镜检查进行回顾性审计。结肠镜检查记录的细节是从患者档案的管理数据库中获得的。没有采用患者特定的纳入或排除标准。结果:研究期间共进行结肠镜检查1143例,分析989例。平均年龄63.04岁(10 ~ 93岁),女性占61.58%,白种人占61.48%,黑人占25.88%。结肠镜检查的指征是;结直肠癌筛查(22.95%)、病例发现(14.16%)和监测(14.96%)。盲肠插管率(CIR)为80.08%。结果包括宏观上正常的结肠(38.12%)、息肉(28.18%)和憩室疾病(23.15%)。在结肠镜检查过程中获得的活检中,30.50%为正常结肠黏膜,10.40%为腺癌,55.37%为管状腺瘤。结论:审计发现了一些不足之处,其中包括:低CIR反映的结肠镜检查表现质量差,未标准化的结肠镜检查报告格式导致范围报告信息缺乏,黑人社区代表性不足,等等。因此,根据本研究的结果,在本单位的结肠镜检查实践中,在许多方面都有改进的余地。进一步的研究对于找出这些不足背后的原因可能是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Gastroenterology Review
South African Gastroenterology Review Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信