Disastrous performance of NanoCote/Aqua Based antimicrobial paint in a hospital setting

J. Ramsden, M. Reid, V. Whatley, S. Dancer
{"title":"Disastrous performance of NanoCote/Aqua Based antimicrobial paint in a hospital setting","authors":"J. Ramsden, M. Reid, V. Whatley, S. Dancer","doi":"10.4024/16RA16A.JBPC.16.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is considerable interest in the potential of antimicrobial surfaces in hospitals to reduce hospitalacquired infections (HAI). Two principal questions need to be answered: (1) are inanimate surfaces important reservoirs for microbes? and (2) can antimicrobial surfaces reduce the environmental microbial burden? The answer to (1) is far from clear, with both “yes” [1] and “no” [2] being promulgated. Nevertheless, it has at least been conceded that microbial contamination on surfaces can be, and probably is, transferred to patients via human hands [3] (while noting that well-designed studies demonstrating that point, or its converse, are so far lacking). If so, proper hand hygiene might be the answer, although Dancer has pointed out that it is, practically, easier to improve cleaning than hand hygiene [4], since the latter, more profoundly than the former, involves behavioural change rather than merely setting up a “standard operating procedure” (SOP) or similar. The answer to (2) is more straightforward: the burden can be reduced and quite a few technologies are now available for doing so [5], which might help to overcome some of the difficulties associated with conventional disinfection [6]. Recently, considerable interest has been shown in copper as an antimicrobial material. Appreciation of its efficacy probably goes back for several millennia, and quite a few studies have succeeded in demonstrating it more or less quantitatively [7–10]. In a frequently-cited paper, Salgado et al. went as far as asserting that copper surfaces reduce the rate of HAI [11]; the critique of this study [12], which effectively negates its conclusions, is unfortunately much less cited. Even if the link between antimicrobial activity at a surface and reduction of HAI remains to be convincingly demonstrated (cf. [13]), it is certainly plausible enough to warrant further investigation of the antimicrobial effect of different surfaces. Making hospital artefacts from copper may be expensive, aesthetically questionable and impracticable to retrofit. In order to counter those difficulties, there has been some interest in depositing thin films of copper on surfaces made from other materials (e.g. [14]), but this is obviously only possible for objects small enough to fit inside a vacuum chamber. A more useful approach may be to nanify the copper and incorporate it into a paint or varnish that can be readily applied to existing services. The bactericidal activity of copper nanoparticles has been demonstrated [15] (as well as that of copper oxide [16]). Cometa et al. have shown that this activity is retained upon entrapment of the particles in a hydrogel [17], and similarly with conventional polymers [18]. The effective encapsulation of the copper may, furthermore, diminish possible dermatological problems arising through copper hypersensitivity [19, 20]. Disastrous performance of NanoCote/Aqua Based antimicrobial paint in a hospital setting","PeriodicalId":88911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological physics and chemistry : JBPC","volume":"16 1","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological physics and chemistry : JBPC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4024/16RA16A.JBPC.16.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the potential of antimicrobial surfaces in hospitals to reduce hospitalacquired infections (HAI). Two principal questions need to be answered: (1) are inanimate surfaces important reservoirs for microbes? and (2) can antimicrobial surfaces reduce the environmental microbial burden? The answer to (1) is far from clear, with both “yes” [1] and “no” [2] being promulgated. Nevertheless, it has at least been conceded that microbial contamination on surfaces can be, and probably is, transferred to patients via human hands [3] (while noting that well-designed studies demonstrating that point, or its converse, are so far lacking). If so, proper hand hygiene might be the answer, although Dancer has pointed out that it is, practically, easier to improve cleaning than hand hygiene [4], since the latter, more profoundly than the former, involves behavioural change rather than merely setting up a “standard operating procedure” (SOP) or similar. The answer to (2) is more straightforward: the burden can be reduced and quite a few technologies are now available for doing so [5], which might help to overcome some of the difficulties associated with conventional disinfection [6]. Recently, considerable interest has been shown in copper as an antimicrobial material. Appreciation of its efficacy probably goes back for several millennia, and quite a few studies have succeeded in demonstrating it more or less quantitatively [7–10]. In a frequently-cited paper, Salgado et al. went as far as asserting that copper surfaces reduce the rate of HAI [11]; the critique of this study [12], which effectively negates its conclusions, is unfortunately much less cited. Even if the link between antimicrobial activity at a surface and reduction of HAI remains to be convincingly demonstrated (cf. [13]), it is certainly plausible enough to warrant further investigation of the antimicrobial effect of different surfaces. Making hospital artefacts from copper may be expensive, aesthetically questionable and impracticable to retrofit. In order to counter those difficulties, there has been some interest in depositing thin films of copper on surfaces made from other materials (e.g. [14]), but this is obviously only possible for objects small enough to fit inside a vacuum chamber. A more useful approach may be to nanify the copper and incorporate it into a paint or varnish that can be readily applied to existing services. The bactericidal activity of copper nanoparticles has been demonstrated [15] (as well as that of copper oxide [16]). Cometa et al. have shown that this activity is retained upon entrapment of the particles in a hydrogel [17], and similarly with conventional polymers [18]. The effective encapsulation of the copper may, furthermore, diminish possible dermatological problems arising through copper hypersensitivity [19, 20]. Disastrous performance of NanoCote/Aqua Based antimicrobial paint in a hospital setting
纳米cote /Aqua基抗菌涂料在医院环境中的灾难性性能
有相当大的兴趣在医院抗菌表面的潜力,以减少医院获得性感染(HAI)。有两个主要问题需要回答:(1)无生命的表面是微生物的重要宿主吗?(2)抗菌表面能否减轻环境微生物负担?第(1)项的答案远未明确,“是”和“不是”两种说法都有。然而,人们至少承认,表面上的微生物污染可以,而且很可能已经通过人的手转移到病人身上(同时注意到,迄今为止还缺乏精心设计的研究来证明这一点或相反的观点)。如果是这样,适当的手部卫生可能是答案,尽管丹瑟指出,实际上,改善清洁比改善手部卫生更容易,因为后者比前者更深刻地涉及行为改变,而不仅仅是建立一个“标准操作程序”(SOP)或类似的东西。(2)的答案更直接:负担可以减轻,而且现在有相当多的技术可以做到这一点,这可能有助于克服与传统消毒有关的一些困难。最近,人们对铜作为一种抗菌材料表现出了相当大的兴趣。对其功效的认识可能可以追溯到几千年前,相当多的研究已经成功地或多或少地定量地证明了它[7-10]。在一篇经常被引用的论文中,Salgado等人甚至断言,铜表面降低了HAI[11]的速率;遗憾的是,对这项研究的批评b[12]实际上否定了它的结论,但被引用的次数却少得多。即使表面上的抗菌活性与HAI减少之间的联系仍有待令人信服的证明(参见b[13]),但它肯定是可信的,足以保证进一步研究不同表面的抗菌作用。用铜制作医院的人工制品可能很昂贵,美学上有问题,而且无法改造。为了克服这些困难,人们对在其他材料(例如b[14])制成的表面上沉积铜薄膜很感兴趣,但这显然只适用于足够小的物体,可以装进真空室。一种更有用的方法可能是将铜纳米化,并将其纳入油漆或清漆中,可以很容易地应用于现有的服务。铜纳米颗粒的杀菌活性已被证明是[15](以及氧化铜[16])。Cometa等人的研究表明,在水凝胶[17]中,这种活性被保留下来,传统聚合物[18]也是如此。此外,铜的有效包封可以减少铜过敏引起的皮肤病问题[19,20]。纳米cote /Aqua基抗菌涂料在医院环境中的灾难性性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信