{"title":"Fenomenología y violencia. La condición europea de la filosofía frente al problema de la alteridad","authors":"A. Osswald","doi":"10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P29-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper pretends to summarize the reflections of Emmanuel Levinas, Jaques Derrida and Hans Rainer Sepp on Husserl´s characterization of the european reason in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology . Firstly, I present the key elements of the Husserlian consideration of philosophy in Crisis and then I try to outline the violence towards alterity that his position would imply. Secondly, I delineate Levinas´s appraisal of contemporary ontology and his idea of giving preference to ethic as a way of dealing with the violence of thinking. Finally, I revisit Derrida´s critique on Levinas and Sepp´s reflection on phenomenology in order to underline the in-between as the proper place of thinking.","PeriodicalId":33854,"journal":{"name":"Tabano","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tabano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P29-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper pretends to summarize the reflections of Emmanuel Levinas, Jaques Derrida and Hans Rainer Sepp on Husserl´s characterization of the european reason in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology . Firstly, I present the key elements of the Husserlian consideration of philosophy in Crisis and then I try to outline the violence towards alterity that his position would imply. Secondly, I delineate Levinas´s appraisal of contemporary ontology and his idea of giving preference to ethic as a way of dealing with the violence of thinking. Finally, I revisit Derrida´s critique on Levinas and Sepp´s reflection on phenomenology in order to underline the in-between as the proper place of thinking.