Fenomenología y violencia. La condición europea de la filosofía frente al problema de la alteridad

Tabano Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P29-47
A. Osswald
{"title":"Fenomenología y violencia. La condición europea de la filosofía frente al problema de la alteridad","authors":"A. Osswald","doi":"10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P29-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper pretends to summarize the reflections of Emmanuel Levinas, Jaques Derrida and Hans Rainer Sepp on Husserl´s characterization of the european reason in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology . Firstly, I present the key elements of the Husserlian consideration of philosophy in Crisis and then I try to outline the violence towards alterity that his position would imply. Secondly, I delineate Levinas´s appraisal of contemporary ontology and his idea of giving preference to ethic as a way of dealing with the violence of thinking. Finally, I revisit Derrida´s critique on Levinas and Sepp´s reflection on phenomenology in order to underline the in-between as the proper place of thinking.","PeriodicalId":33854,"journal":{"name":"Tabano","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tabano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P29-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper pretends to summarize the reflections of Emmanuel Levinas, Jaques Derrida and Hans Rainer Sepp on Husserl´s characterization of the european reason in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology . Firstly, I present the key elements of the Husserlian consideration of philosophy in Crisis and then I try to outline the violence towards alterity that his position would imply. Secondly, I delineate Levinas´s appraisal of contemporary ontology and his idea of giving preference to ethic as a way of dealing with the violence of thinking. Finally, I revisit Derrida´s critique on Levinas and Sepp´s reflection on phenomenology in order to underline the in-between as the proper place of thinking.
现象学与暴力。欧洲哲学在他者问题中的地位
本文试图总结列维纳斯、德里达和塞普对胡塞尔在《欧洲科学的危机与先验现象学》中对欧洲理性的刻画的思考。首先,我提出胡塞尔在《危机》中对哲学思考的关键要素,然后我试图概述他的立场所暗示的对另类的暴力。其次,我描述了列维纳斯对当代本体论的评价,以及他优先考虑伦理作为处理思维暴力的一种方式的想法。最后,我将回顾德里达对列维纳斯的批判和塞普对现象学的反思,以强调中间地带才是思考的正确位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信