Addressing environmental contamination through market regulations: comparative lessons from the United States and the European Union

Alexandra Rosenbluth, L. Smith
{"title":"Addressing environmental contamination through market regulations: comparative lessons from the United States and the European Union","authors":"Alexandra Rosenbluth, L. Smith","doi":"10.4314/JSDLP.V7I2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing legal frameworks in the United States (US) and the European Commission (EC) that regulate industrial chemicals represent divergent methods for controlling market entry, market restriction, and subsequent regulatory oversight when enforcement of these mechanisms fail. Contrary to the prevailing view that the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) law, which amended the US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), is the ‘gold standard’ for chemical regulation, the central premise of this article is that the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act for the 21st Century provides unique opportunities for preventing environmental releases from new and existing chemical substances, which amounts to, if not more stringent, than REACH. Keywords: REACH, TSCA, Lautenberg, toxic chemicals","PeriodicalId":31326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/JSDLP.V7I2.1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JSDLP.V7I2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing legal frameworks in the United States (US) and the European Commission (EC) that regulate industrial chemicals represent divergent methods for controlling market entry, market restriction, and subsequent regulatory oversight when enforcement of these mechanisms fail. Contrary to the prevailing view that the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) law, which amended the US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), is the ‘gold standard’ for chemical regulation, the central premise of this article is that the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act for the 21st Century provides unique opportunities for preventing environmental releases from new and existing chemical substances, which amounts to, if not more stringent, than REACH. Keywords: REACH, TSCA, Lautenberg, toxic chemicals
通过市场监管解决环境污染:来自美国和欧盟的比较经验教训
美国(US)和欧盟委员会(EC)现有的管理工业化学品的法律框架在控制市场准入、市场限制以及在这些机制执行失败时的后续监管监督方面表现出不同的方法。与普遍认为修订了《美国有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)的《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法》(REACH)是化学品监管的“黄金标准”的观点相反,本文的中心前提是,《21世纪弗兰克·r·劳滕贝格化学品安全法》为防止新的和现有的化学物质向环境释放提供了独特的机会,如果不是更严格的话,它相当于:比范围。关键词:REACH, TSCA, Lautenberg,有毒化学品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信