The doctrine of party autonomy in international commercial arbitration: myth or reality?

S. A. Fagbemi
{"title":"The doctrine of party autonomy in international commercial arbitration: myth or reality?","authors":"S. A. Fagbemi","doi":"10.4314/JSDLP.V6I1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased preference for arbitration has buttressed the growing disenchantment for traditional adversary method of litigation. The foundation of every arbitration proceeding is the arbitration agreement. The parties’ agreement constitutes a contract to refer disputes, which have arisen or may arise in future between them to arbitration. The freedom of parties to consensually execute arbitration agreement is known as the principle of party autonomy. The principle provides a right for the parties to international commercial arbitration to choose applicable substantive law and these laws when chosen shall govern the contractual relationship of the parties. However, the pertinent questions have always been: Do parties actually have absolute freedom to determine the arbitration process? To what extent has this been achieved in the resolution of disputes having international concerns? And lastly, is party autonomy a myth or reality? These questions and many others have continued to provoke discussions in many fora on the applicability of party autonomy in international commercial arbitration. To find meaning to the above questions, this article analyses the principle of party autonomy. The ultimate aim of the article is to answer the question whether the practical application of the principle of party autonomy is indeed a myth or reality? Keywords : Party Autonomy, International Commercial Arbitration.","PeriodicalId":31326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":"202-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/JSDLP.V6I1.10","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JSDLP.V6I1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The increased preference for arbitration has buttressed the growing disenchantment for traditional adversary method of litigation. The foundation of every arbitration proceeding is the arbitration agreement. The parties’ agreement constitutes a contract to refer disputes, which have arisen or may arise in future between them to arbitration. The freedom of parties to consensually execute arbitration agreement is known as the principle of party autonomy. The principle provides a right for the parties to international commercial arbitration to choose applicable substantive law and these laws when chosen shall govern the contractual relationship of the parties. However, the pertinent questions have always been: Do parties actually have absolute freedom to determine the arbitration process? To what extent has this been achieved in the resolution of disputes having international concerns? And lastly, is party autonomy a myth or reality? These questions and many others have continued to provoke discussions in many fora on the applicability of party autonomy in international commercial arbitration. To find meaning to the above questions, this article analyses the principle of party autonomy. The ultimate aim of the article is to answer the question whether the practical application of the principle of party autonomy is indeed a myth or reality? Keywords : Party Autonomy, International Commercial Arbitration.
国际商事仲裁中的当事人自治原则:神话还是现实?
越来越多的人倾向于仲裁,这使得人们对传统的对手诉讼方式越来越不抱幻想。任何仲裁程序的基础都是仲裁协议。双方的协议构成将双方之间已经发生或将来可能发生的争议提交仲裁的合同。当事人自愿执行仲裁协议的自由被称为当事人自治原则。该原则规定,国际商事仲裁当事人有权选择适用的实体法,所选择的实体法应管辖当事人的合同关系。然而,相关的问题一直是:当事人真的有决定仲裁程序的绝对自由吗?在解决引起国际关注的争端方面取得了多大程度的进展?最后,政党自治是神话还是现实?这些问题和许多其他问题继续在许多论坛上引发关于当事方自治在国际商事仲裁中的适用性的讨论。为了探求上述问题的意义,本文对当事人自治原则进行了分析。本文的最终目的是回答党的自治原则的实际应用究竟是神话还是现实?关键词:当事人自治,国际商事仲裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信