{"title":"Nuevo Constitucionalismo de la Biodiversidad vs. Neoconstitucionalismo del Riesgo","authors":"M. Carducci, L. P. C. Amaya","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"based on an \"eco-systemic\" democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the \"Gaia hypothesis\" and legitimizes a real \"social contract\" among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an \"object\" of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal \"subject\" and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its \"legal grantor and protector\".","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"37 1","pages":"255-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N73P255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
based on an "eco-systemic" democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the "Gaia hypothesis" and legitimizes a real "social contract" among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an "object" of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal "subject" and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its "legal grantor and protector".