Processo Judicial como Espelho da Realidade? Notas Hermenêuticas à Teoria da Verdade em Michele Taruffo

L. Streck
{"title":"Processo Judicial como Espelho da Realidade? Notas Hermenêuticas à Teoria da Verdade em Michele Taruffo","authors":"L. Streck","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the question of truth in law, more specifically: the epistemological status of judicial process. In a phenomenological approach, aims to clarify the importance of facts to the right answer. Proceeds comparing two referentials: the critical realism of Michele Taruffo and the Critical Hermeneutics of Law. In spite of its democratic common ground, there is a deep disagreement about what is meant by inter-subjective control of judgments. The conclusion drawn is to reject the \"truth acquiring\" structure of justice system as proposed by Taruffo.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"37 1","pages":"115-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P115","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of truth in law, more specifically: the epistemological status of judicial process. In a phenomenological approach, aims to clarify the importance of facts to the right answer. Proceeds comparing two referentials: the critical realism of Michele Taruffo and the Critical Hermeneutics of Law. In spite of its democratic common ground, there is a deep disagreement about what is meant by inter-subjective control of judgments. The conclusion drawn is to reject the "truth acquiring" structure of justice system as proposed by Taruffo.
司法程序是现实的镜子?米歇尔·塔鲁福真理理论的解释学注释
本文探讨法律真理问题,更具体地说,就是司法程序的认识论地位问题。在现象学方法中,旨在阐明事实对正确答案的重要性。接着比较两种参照:米歇尔·塔鲁夫的批判现实主义和法律的批判解释学。尽管有民主的共同点,但对于判断的主体间控制的含义存在深刻的分歧。本文的结论是对塔鲁福提出的“获得真相”的司法体系结构的否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信