The Mimesis of Time in Hamlet

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
E. Levy
{"title":"The Mimesis of Time in Hamlet","authors":"E. Levy","doi":"10.5040/9781474292078.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hamlet opens on intense attention to time, as the sentries \"watch the minutes of this night\" (1.1.30). (1) The emphasis gains thematic depth when Hamlet formulates his predicament in terms of temporal dislocation: \"The time is out of joint. O cursed spite, / That ever I was born to set it right\" (1.5.196-97). The problem of time is raised to philosophical status in Polonius's rhetoric: \"Why day is day, night night, and time is time\" (2.2.88). The importance of time in Hamlet has provoked numerous studies, but none has approached the marter through recourse to the temporal analysis of John McTaggart, whose celebrated article on the unreality of time, published in 1908 and later republished in the second volume of his metaphysical work, The Nature of Existence, is often recognized as the seminal treatise in the philosophy of rime of the last one hundred years. (2) Though virtually no philosophers have defended McTaggart's claim that time is unreal, scores of them, in hundreds of articles and books on the subject, have addressed some aspect of his description of the two temporal series proper to time (or, more precisely, the notion of time). These two series, easily defined, can serve as powerful lenses though which to analyze and illumine the structure of rime in Hamlet. The result of our inquiry will be a new understanding of the representation of time--or, more precisely, what Gerhard Dohrn-van-Rossum terms \"time-consciousness\"--in the text. (3) For the elements which we shall draw from McTaggart are not theoretical (in the sense of imposing ideational constructs on reality or what actually is), but descriptive, in the sense of articulating the actual conceptual content of the notion of time--what E.J. Lowe calls the \"indispensable ingredients in our understanding of what time is\" and what L. Nathan Oaklander calls the \"two ways in which we ordinarily conceive and talk about time.\" (4) Despite the fact that McTaggart's theory of the non-reality of time turned out historically to be a dead end, his succinct and penetrating analysis of what time is conceptually--what concepts are intrinsic to the very idea of time--has exercised profound and lasting influence on philosophers of time, ever since he published his formulations. Ironically, though ultimately concerned with demonstrating that time is not, McTaggart's analysis has become indispensable to many philosophers in defining what time is. But before proceeding with this investigation, brief recapitulation of earlier approaches to the problem of time in Hamlet will contextualize discussion. A convenient introduction to such considerations concerns emphasis on the Renaissance as the period when temporal awareness broke through to a new level. Georges Poulet stresses the upsurge in the sense of transience: \"It is indeed true that one felt then as always, and perhaps more keenly then ever before, the precarious and fugitive character of each lived moment.\" David Scott Kastan elaborates on this aspect of the temporal awareness of Renaissance man: \"His world is one in which the unidirectional and irreversible flow of time brings an intensified sense of the fragility and precariousness of being.\" Ricardo Quinones underscores this temporal insecurity by pointing to the Renaissance concern with the Saturnine quality of time, construed in terms of its \"menacing and destructive\" activity, analogous to that of the mythological Saturn, the god who consumed his own offspring. Other scholars foreground more positive aspects of Renaissance temporality, by focusing on the achievement of historical perspective. Erwin Panofsky, for example, highlights the role of intense philological study of classical texts which enabled the understanding of ancient civilization \"as a phenomenon complete in itself, yet belonging to the past and historically detached from the contemporary world.\" Dohrn-van-Rossum addresses the role of nascent technology in fostering awareness of the difference between past and present: \"From the beginning of the fifteenth century, at the latest, the preoccupation with inventions developed a historical perspective. …","PeriodicalId":43889,"journal":{"name":"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOLOGICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474292078.ch-001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Hamlet opens on intense attention to time, as the sentries "watch the minutes of this night" (1.1.30). (1) The emphasis gains thematic depth when Hamlet formulates his predicament in terms of temporal dislocation: "The time is out of joint. O cursed spite, / That ever I was born to set it right" (1.5.196-97). The problem of time is raised to philosophical status in Polonius's rhetoric: "Why day is day, night night, and time is time" (2.2.88). The importance of time in Hamlet has provoked numerous studies, but none has approached the marter through recourse to the temporal analysis of John McTaggart, whose celebrated article on the unreality of time, published in 1908 and later republished in the second volume of his metaphysical work, The Nature of Existence, is often recognized as the seminal treatise in the philosophy of rime of the last one hundred years. (2) Though virtually no philosophers have defended McTaggart's claim that time is unreal, scores of them, in hundreds of articles and books on the subject, have addressed some aspect of his description of the two temporal series proper to time (or, more precisely, the notion of time). These two series, easily defined, can serve as powerful lenses though which to analyze and illumine the structure of rime in Hamlet. The result of our inquiry will be a new understanding of the representation of time--or, more precisely, what Gerhard Dohrn-van-Rossum terms "time-consciousness"--in the text. (3) For the elements which we shall draw from McTaggart are not theoretical (in the sense of imposing ideational constructs on reality or what actually is), but descriptive, in the sense of articulating the actual conceptual content of the notion of time--what E.J. Lowe calls the "indispensable ingredients in our understanding of what time is" and what L. Nathan Oaklander calls the "two ways in which we ordinarily conceive and talk about time." (4) Despite the fact that McTaggart's theory of the non-reality of time turned out historically to be a dead end, his succinct and penetrating analysis of what time is conceptually--what concepts are intrinsic to the very idea of time--has exercised profound and lasting influence on philosophers of time, ever since he published his formulations. Ironically, though ultimately concerned with demonstrating that time is not, McTaggart's analysis has become indispensable to many philosophers in defining what time is. But before proceeding with this investigation, brief recapitulation of earlier approaches to the problem of time in Hamlet will contextualize discussion. A convenient introduction to such considerations concerns emphasis on the Renaissance as the period when temporal awareness broke through to a new level. Georges Poulet stresses the upsurge in the sense of transience: "It is indeed true that one felt then as always, and perhaps more keenly then ever before, the precarious and fugitive character of each lived moment." David Scott Kastan elaborates on this aspect of the temporal awareness of Renaissance man: "His world is one in which the unidirectional and irreversible flow of time brings an intensified sense of the fragility and precariousness of being." Ricardo Quinones underscores this temporal insecurity by pointing to the Renaissance concern with the Saturnine quality of time, construed in terms of its "menacing and destructive" activity, analogous to that of the mythological Saturn, the god who consumed his own offspring. Other scholars foreground more positive aspects of Renaissance temporality, by focusing on the achievement of historical perspective. Erwin Panofsky, for example, highlights the role of intense philological study of classical texts which enabled the understanding of ancient civilization "as a phenomenon complete in itself, yet belonging to the past and historically detached from the contemporary world." Dohrn-van-Rossum addresses the role of nascent technology in fostering awareness of the difference between past and present: "From the beginning of the fifteenth century, at the latest, the preoccupation with inventions developed a historical perspective. …
《哈姆雷特》中对时间的模仿
《哈姆雷特》一开场就表现了对时间的高度关注,哨兵们“注视着今夜的分分秒秒”(1.1.30)。(1)当哈姆雷特用时间错位来表述他的困境时,强调的重点增加了主题的深度:“时间脱离了关节。啊,可诅咒的怨恨,/我生来就是为了纠正它”(1.5.196-97)。在波洛涅斯的修辞学中,时间问题被提升到哲学的地位:“为什么白天是白天,黑夜是黑夜,时间是时间”(2.2.88)。《哈姆雷特》中时间的重要性引发了无数的研究,但没有人通过约翰·麦克塔格特的时间分析来探讨这个问题。麦克塔格特在1908年发表了一篇著名的关于时间的非现实性的文章,后来在他的形而上学著作《存在的本质》第二卷中再版,这篇文章通常被认为是过去一百年来时间哲学的开创性论文。(2)虽然实际上没有哲学家为麦克塔格特关于时间是不真实的主张辩护,但他们中的许多人,在关于这个主题的数百篇文章和书籍中,已经讨论了他对两个时间序列(或者更准确地说,时间概念)的描述的某些方面。这两个系列,很容易定义,可以作为强有力的镜头,通过它们来分析和阐明《哈姆雷特》的时间结构。我们调查的结果将是对时间表征的新理解——或者,更准确地说,Gerhard Dohrn-van-Rossum所说的“时间意识”——在文本中。(3)因为我们将从麦克塔格特那里汲取的要素并不是理论的(就把概念构念强加于现实或实际存在的东西上的意义而言),而是描述性的,就阐明时间概念的实际概念性意旨的意义而言——即E.J.洛所说的“我们理解时间是什么不可或缺的成分”,以及L.内森·奥克兰德所说的“我们通常构想和谈论时间的两种方式”。(4)尽管麦克塔格特关于时间非实在性的理论在历史上被证明是一条死胡同,但自从他发表了他的公式以来,他对时间在概念上是什么——什么概念是时间概念所固有的——的简洁而深刻的分析,对时间哲学家产生了深远而持久的影响。具有讽刺意味的是,尽管最终关注的是证明时间不存在,但对于许多哲学家来说,在定义时间是什么时,麦克塔格特的分析已经成为不可或缺的。但在继续这个调查之前,简要回顾一下之前对《哈姆雷特》中时间问题的处理方法,将讨论置于语境中。对这些考虑的一个方便的介绍是,强调文艺复兴时期是时间意识突破到一个新水平的时期。乔治·波莱特(Georges Poulet)强调了短暂感中的高涨:“人们确实会一如既往地感受到,也许比以往任何时候都更加敏锐,感受到每一个生命时刻的不稳定和短暂性。”David Scott Kastan详细阐述了文艺复兴时期人的时间意识的这一方面:“在他的世界里,单向和不可逆的时间流动带来了一种强烈的脆弱感和不稳定性。”里卡多·奎诺内斯(Ricardo Quinones)强调了这种时间上的不安全感,他指出文艺复兴时期对时间的土星性质的关注,以其“威胁性和破坏性”的活动来解释,类似于神话中的土星(Saturn),即消耗自己后代的神。其他学者通过关注历史视角的成就,突出了文艺复兴时期时间性的更多积极方面。例如,欧文·帕诺夫斯基(Erwin Panofsky)强调了对古典文本进行深入的文字学研究的作用,这使得对古代文明的理解“作为一种本身完整的现象,但属于过去,在历史上与当代世界分离”。Dohrn-van-Rossum谈到了新兴技术在培养对过去和现在之间差异的认识方面的作用:“最迟从15世纪初开始,对发明的关注发展了一个历史的视角。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信