The Quantitative Effect of Community-Based Participatory Research on Building Teamwork among Medical and Long-Term Care Services in Rural Japan: The Tome Medical Project

Kemmyo Sugiyama, T. Tsuboya
{"title":"The Quantitative Effect of Community-Based Participatory Research on Building Teamwork among Medical and Long-Term Care Services in Rural Japan: The Tome Medical Project","authors":"Kemmyo Sugiyama, T. Tsuboya","doi":"10.4172/2161-0711.1000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Comprehensive teamwork among medical experts, nursing-care experts and non-experts are essential in promoting medical and nursing care services in a community for the well-being of all residents. For accomplishment, inter-professional workshops have been conducted in various places throughout Japan. However, only a few studies have evaluated the effect of these activities, and most of them included only medical experts. Thus, we launched a community-based participatory research (CBPR), consisted of serial workshops in Tome City, a northeastern rural area in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitively evaluate the effect of CBPR. Methods: We held workshops including small lectures at a frequency of 1-2 times a month during six months. The participants discussed issues of medical or long-term care in Tome City. At baseline and the final workshops, we distributed to the participants questionnaires where they graded scores on the quality of cooperation among medical and nursing-care services in Tome. The summed scores were used as our main outcome. The higher scores mean better integration. Results: The median (range) of the scores for overall participants were 101.0 (66.0) at baseline, and 89.0 (76.0) at the end, with no statistical difference observed (p=0.50). Similar results were observed when stratified by number of times attending to other workshops and medical or nursing-care profession. Conclusion: No improvement in collaboration was observed after serial workshops in 6 months. Further discussions would be needed how we can promote better collaboration among professionals and citizens for the achievement of residents’ well-being.","PeriodicalId":73681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community medicine & health education","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0711.1000605","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community medicine & health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive teamwork among medical experts, nursing-care experts and non-experts are essential in promoting medical and nursing care services in a community for the well-being of all residents. For accomplishment, inter-professional workshops have been conducted in various places throughout Japan. However, only a few studies have evaluated the effect of these activities, and most of them included only medical experts. Thus, we launched a community-based participatory research (CBPR), consisted of serial workshops in Tome City, a northeastern rural area in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitively evaluate the effect of CBPR. Methods: We held workshops including small lectures at a frequency of 1-2 times a month during six months. The participants discussed issues of medical or long-term care in Tome City. At baseline and the final workshops, we distributed to the participants questionnaires where they graded scores on the quality of cooperation among medical and nursing-care services in Tome. The summed scores were used as our main outcome. The higher scores mean better integration. Results: The median (range) of the scores for overall participants were 101.0 (66.0) at baseline, and 89.0 (76.0) at the end, with no statistical difference observed (p=0.50). Similar results were observed when stratified by number of times attending to other workshops and medical or nursing-care profession. Conclusion: No improvement in collaboration was observed after serial workshops in 6 months. Further discussions would be needed how we can promote better collaboration among professionals and citizens for the achievement of residents’ well-being.
基于社区的参与式研究对日本农村医疗和长期护理服务团队合作的定量影响:Tome医疗项目
背景:医学专家、护理专家和非专家之间的全面合作是促进社区医疗和护理服务的必要条件,以造福所有居民。为了实现这一目标,在日本各地举办了跨专业研讨会。然而,只有少数研究评估了这些活动的影响,其中大多数研究只包括医学专家。因此,我们在日本东北部农村地区Tome市发起了一项基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR),包括一系列讲习班。据我们所知,这是第一个定量评估CBPR效果的研究。方法:在6个月的时间里,我们以每月1-2次的频率举办研讨会,包括小型讲座。与会者讨论了汤姆市的医疗或长期护理问题。在基线和最后的研讨会上,我们向参与者分发了问卷,让他们对多美医疗和护理服务之间的合作质量进行评分。我们将总得分作为主要结果。分数越高意味着整合能力越强。结果:总体受试者的中位(范围)得分基线时为101.0分(66.0分),结束时为89.0分(76.0分),差异无统计学意义(p=0.50)。当按参加其他讲习班和医疗或护理专业的次数分层时,观察到类似的结果。结论:6个月的连续研讨会后,患者的协作能力未见改善。我们需要进一步讨论如何促进专业人士和市民之间更好的合作,以实现居民的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信