A Theoretical Comparison among Recursive Algorithms for Fast Computation of Zernike Moments Using the Concept of Time Complexity

Nasrin Bastani, A. Vard, Mehdi Jabalameli, Vahid Bastani
{"title":"A Theoretical Comparison among Recursive Algorithms for Fast Computation of Zernike Moments Using the Concept of Time Complexity","authors":"Nasrin Bastani, A. Vard, Mehdi Jabalameli, Vahid Bastani","doi":"10.4236/ajcm.2021.114020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zernike polynomials have been used in different fields such as optics, astronomy, and digital image analysis for many years. To form these polynomials, Zernike moments are essential to be determined. One of the main issues in realizing the moments is using factorial terms in their equation which causes higher time complexity. As a solution, several methods have been presented to reduce the time complexity of these polynomials in recent years. The purpose of this research is to study several methods among the most popular recursive methods for fast Zernike computation and compare them together by a global theoretical evaluation system called worst-case time complexity. In this study, we have analyzed the selected algorithms and calculated the worst-case time complexity for each one. After that, the results are represented and explained and finally, a conclusion has been made by com-paring these criteria among the studied algorithms. According to time complexity, we have observed that although some algorithms such as Wee method and Modified Prata method were successful in having the smaller time complexities, some other approaches did not make any significant difference compared to the classical algorithm.","PeriodicalId":64456,"journal":{"name":"美国计算数学期刊(英文)","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美国计算数学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2021.114020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zernike polynomials have been used in different fields such as optics, astronomy, and digital image analysis for many years. To form these polynomials, Zernike moments are essential to be determined. One of the main issues in realizing the moments is using factorial terms in their equation which causes higher time complexity. As a solution, several methods have been presented to reduce the time complexity of these polynomials in recent years. The purpose of this research is to study several methods among the most popular recursive methods for fast Zernike computation and compare them together by a global theoretical evaluation system called worst-case time complexity. In this study, we have analyzed the selected algorithms and calculated the worst-case time complexity for each one. After that, the results are represented and explained and finally, a conclusion has been made by com-paring these criteria among the studied algorithms. According to time complexity, we have observed that although some algorithms such as Wee method and Modified Prata method were successful in having the smaller time complexities, some other approaches did not make any significant difference compared to the classical algorithm.
基于时间复杂度概念的Zernike矩快速递归计算方法的理论比较
Zernike多项式已在光学、天文学和数字图像分析等不同领域应用多年。要形成这些多项式,必须确定泽尼克矩。实现矩的主要问题之一是在其方程中使用阶乘项,这会导致更高的时间复杂度。为了解决这一问题,近年来人们提出了几种方法来降低这些多项式的时间复杂度。本研究的目的是研究几种最流行的快速泽尼克递归计算方法,并通过一个称为最坏情况时间复杂度的全局理论评价系统对它们进行比较。在本研究中,我们分析了所选择的算法,并计算了每种算法的最坏情况时间复杂度。然后对结果进行描述和解释,最后通过对所研究算法中这些准则的比较得出结论。根据时间复杂度,我们观察到,虽然一些算法如Wee方法和Modified Prata方法成功地具有较小的时间复杂度,但其他一些方法与经典算法相比并没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
348
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信