On "Being" and "Existence"

L. Wang
{"title":"On \"Being\" and \"Existence\"","authors":"L. Wang","doi":"10.5040/9781350993907.ch-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Chinese,\"being\" has quite a few definitions,including the definition of \"existence\".However,its basic usage is a link verb.In Western philosophy,\"being\" and \"existence\" are two completely different concepts because \"existence\" cannot reveal the implications of \"being\" or vice versa.\"Being\" as a core concept reflects Western philosophy as a disciplinary category in terms of epistemology and mirrors the basic way of understanding the world and mankind himself.In this case,\"being\" should be understood as \"to be\" rather than \"existence\" and its understanding should be related to \"truth\" and the examples in Western philosophy and \"ways of being\" all the time.Thus,a correct understanding of \"being\" should rely on an understanding of its historical development in Western philosophy rather than the surface meaning of the Chinese translation.","PeriodicalId":65223,"journal":{"name":"云南大学学报(社会科学版)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"云南大学学报(社会科学版)","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350993907.ch-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Chinese,"being" has quite a few definitions,including the definition of "existence".However,its basic usage is a link verb.In Western philosophy,"being" and "existence" are two completely different concepts because "existence" cannot reveal the implications of "being" or vice versa."Being" as a core concept reflects Western philosophy as a disciplinary category in terms of epistemology and mirrors the basic way of understanding the world and mankind himself.In this case,"being" should be understood as "to be" rather than "existence" and its understanding should be related to "truth" and the examples in Western philosophy and "ways of being" all the time.Thus,a correct understanding of "being" should rely on an understanding of its historical development in Western philosophy rather than the surface meaning of the Chinese translation.
论“存在”与“存在”
在汉语中,“存在”有很多定义,包括“存在”的定义。然而,它的基本用法是连接动词。在西方哲学中,“存在”和“存在”是两个完全不同的概念,因为“存在”不能揭示“存在”的含义,反之亦然。作为核心概念的“存在”反映了西方哲学作为一个学科范畴的认识论,反映了认识世界和人类自身的基本方式。在这种情况下,“存在”应该被理解为“存在”而不是“存在”,它的理解应该与“真理”以及西方哲学中的例子和“存在方式”有关。因此,正确理解“存在”一词,不应只从汉译的表面意义出发,而应从西方哲学的历史发展出发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1677
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信