Evaluation of OLGA and OLGIM Systems in Madagascar, a Country with Low Economic Resources

M.R. Rabarison, L. Nomenjanahary, N. Randrianjafisamindrakotroka
{"title":"Evaluation of OLGA and OLGIM Systems in Madagascar, a Country with Low Economic Resources","authors":"M.R. Rabarison, L. Nomenjanahary, N. Randrianjafisamindrakotroka","doi":"10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic gastritis is a persistent inflammation of the gastric mucosa. The Sydney System is the most widely used classification of this disease but it does not allow a ranking of patients according to the evolutionary potential of the disease, unlike the classifications: “Operative Link On Gastritis Assessment” (OLGA) and “Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment” (OLGIM). Our goals are to apply and evaluate the three classifications: the Sydney System, OLGA and OLGIM and to draw possible correlations. This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study performed on all cases of chronic gastritis, diagnosed at the laboratory of Pathological Anatomy Unit of Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona University Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017. A review and application of the three main classification systems was performed on each case. We included 298 cases. The mean age was 50.85 years. The sex ratio was 1.48. The high-risk stages according to the “Operative Link On Gastritis Assessment” (OLGA) system and the “Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment” (OLGIM) system were 0.67% and 2.68%, respectively. We observed a correlation between the two systems with discordance of 5%. The use of the two new systems allows the assessment of the progressive potential of gastritis in patients at risk of developing gastric cancer. For optimal effectiveness of both classifications, biopsies should be performed according to the Sydney System recommendations.","PeriodicalId":57444,"journal":{"name":"病理学期刊(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"病理学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic gastritis is a persistent inflammation of the gastric mucosa. The Sydney System is the most widely used classification of this disease but it does not allow a ranking of patients according to the evolutionary potential of the disease, unlike the classifications: “Operative Link On Gastritis Assessment” (OLGA) and “Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment” (OLGIM). Our goals are to apply and evaluate the three classifications: the Sydney System, OLGA and OLGIM and to draw possible correlations. This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study performed on all cases of chronic gastritis, diagnosed at the laboratory of Pathological Anatomy Unit of Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona University Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017. A review and application of the three main classification systems was performed on each case. We included 298 cases. The mean age was 50.85 years. The sex ratio was 1.48. The high-risk stages according to the “Operative Link On Gastritis Assessment” (OLGA) system and the “Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment” (OLGIM) system were 0.67% and 2.68%, respectively. We observed a correlation between the two systems with discordance of 5%. The use of the two new systems allows the assessment of the progressive potential of gastritis in patients at risk of developing gastric cancer. For optimal effectiveness of both classifications, biopsies should be performed according to the Sydney System recommendations.
低经济资源国家马达加斯加OLGA和OLGIM系统评价
慢性胃炎是胃粘膜的持续性炎症。悉尼系统是最广泛使用的这种疾病的分类,但它不允许根据疾病的进化潜力对患者进行排名,不像分类:“胃炎手术环节评估”(OLGA)和“胃炎肠化生手术环节评估”(OLGIM)。我们的目标是应用和评估三种分类:悉尼系统,OLGA和OLGIM,并得出可能的相关性。这是一项回顾性、描述性、单中心研究,对2013年1月1日至2017年12月31日在Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona大学医院病理解剖科实验室诊断的所有慢性胃炎病例进行了研究。对每个案例进行了三种主要分类系统的回顾和应用。我们纳入了298例病例。平均年龄50.85岁。性别比为1.48。“手术环节胃炎评估”(OLGA)和“手术环节胃炎肠化生评估”(OLGIM)的高危期分别为0.67%和2.68%。我们观察到两个系统之间的相关性有5%的不一致性。使用这两种新系统可以评估有发展为胃癌风险的患者胃炎的进展潜力。为了两种分类的最佳效果,应根据悉尼系统的建议进行活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信