Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update

S. Rahman, A. Hossain, S. Alam, Anisur Rahman, Chandana Sultana, Yusuf Jamal Khan, M. Amiruzzaman
{"title":"Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update","authors":"S. Rahman, A. Hossain, S. Alam, Anisur Rahman, Chandana Sultana, Yusuf Jamal Khan, M. Amiruzzaman","doi":"10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of Review: The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available information in the literature and author experience. This review presents a workable framework from the first presentation, epidemiology, classification, investigations, management principles, complications, prognostic factors, final visual outcome and management debates. Review Findings: Mechanical ocular trauma is a leading cause of monocular blindness and possible handicap worldwide. Among several classification systems, the most widely accepted is Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). Mechanical ocular trauma is a topic of unsolved controversy. Patching for corneal abrasion, paracentesis for hyphema, the timing of cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation are all issues in anterior segment injuries. Regarding posterior segment controversies, the timing of vitrectomy, use of prophylactic cryotherapy, the necessity of intravitreal antibiotics in the absence of infection, the use of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in traumatic endophthalmitis is the issues. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The various prognostic factors have a role in the final visual outcome. B scan is used to exclude R.D, Intraocular foreign body (IOFB), and vitreous haemorrhage in hazy media. Individual surgical strategies are used for every patient according to the classification and extent of the injuries. Conclusion: This article examines relevant evidence on the management challenges and controversies of mechanical trauma of the eye How to cite this paper: Rahman, S., Hossain, A., Alam, S., Rahman, A., Sultana, C., Islam, S., Khan, Y.J. and Amiruzzaman, Md. (2021) Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 11, 348-363. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029 Received: October 24, 2021 Accepted: November 27, 2021 Published: November 30, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access","PeriodicalId":60672,"journal":{"name":"眼科学期刊(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available information in the literature and author experience. This review presents a workable framework from the first presentation, epidemiology, classification, investigations, management principles, complications, prognostic factors, final visual outcome and management debates. Review Findings: Mechanical ocular trauma is a leading cause of monocular blindness and possible handicap worldwide. Among several classification systems, the most widely accepted is Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). Mechanical ocular trauma is a topic of unsolved controversy. Patching for corneal abrasion, paracentesis for hyphema, the timing of cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation are all issues in anterior segment injuries. Regarding posterior segment controversies, the timing of vitrectomy, use of prophylactic cryotherapy, the necessity of intravitreal antibiotics in the absence of infection, the use of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in traumatic endophthalmitis is the issues. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The various prognostic factors have a role in the final visual outcome. B scan is used to exclude R.D, Intraocular foreign body (IOFB), and vitreous haemorrhage in hazy media. Individual surgical strategies are used for every patient according to the classification and extent of the injuries. Conclusion: This article examines relevant evidence on the management challenges and controversies of mechanical trauma of the eye How to cite this paper: Rahman, S., Hossain, A., Alam, S., Rahman, A., Sultana, C., Islam, S., Khan, Y.J. and Amiruzzaman, Md. (2021) Mechanical Eye Trauma Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors, and Management Controversies—An Update. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 11, 348-363. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029 Received: October 24, 2021 Accepted: November 27, 2021 Published: November 30, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access
机械性眼外伤流行病学、预后因素和管理争议的最新进展
回顾的目的:眼部损伤的处理既困难又有争议。本研究试图利用文献和作者经验中现有的信息来强调眼外伤的管理。这篇综述从首次表现、流行病学、分类、调查、管理原则、并发症、预后因素、最终视觉结果和管理辩论等方面提出了一个可行的框架。在世界范围内,机械性眼外伤是单眼失明和残疾的主要原因。在几种分类系统中,最被广泛接受的是伯明翰眼外伤术语(BETT)。机械性眼外伤是一个尚未解决的争议话题。角膜磨损的修补,前房积血的穿刺,白内障手术的时机和人工晶状体植入术都是前段损伤的问题。关于后段争议,玻璃体切除术的时机,预防性冷冻治疗的使用,在没有感染的情况下玻璃体内抗生素的必要性,玻璃体切除术与玻璃体穿刺治疗外伤性眼内炎的应用是问题。由于弱视、眼内炎症和明显的玻璃体视网膜粘连的风险,儿科年龄组需要采用不同的治疗方案。各种预后因素对最终的视力结果都有影响。B扫描用于排除rrd,眼内异物(IOFB)和玻璃体出血在朦胧介质。根据损伤的分类和程度,对每位患者采用单独的手术策略。结论:本文研究了眼部机械创伤管理挑战和争议的相关证据。如何引用本文:Rahman, S., Hossain, A., Alam, S., Rahman, A., Sultana, C., Islam, S., Khan, Y.J.和Amiruzzaman, Md.(2021)机械眼创伤流行病学,预后因素和管理争议-更新。眼科杂志,11,348-363。https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2021.114029收稿日期:2021年10月24日收稿日期:2021年11月27日出版日期:2021年11月30日版权所有©作者与科研出版公司。本作品采用知识共享署名国际许可协议(CC BY 4.0)。http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/开放获取
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
232
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信