John Ebejer, Anna Staniewska, J. Środulska-Wielgus, Krzysztof Wielgus
{"title":"Values as a base for the viable adaptive reuse of fortified heritage in urban contexts","authors":"John Ebejer, Anna Staniewska, J. Środulska-Wielgus, Krzysztof Wielgus","doi":"10.46284/mkd.2023.11.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last decades have brought a growing interest in fortified heritage research, protection and reuse in Europe as a result of the demilitarisation of numerous historic defence structures occupied by armies in many countries and used as service facilities during the Cold War. There are various approaches to the conservation of fortified heritage and adaptive reuse is one of them. The values associated with a site should constitute the departure and arrival point for any type of intervention. An essential part of the process therefore should be the appropriate identification of these values to base on them contemporary actions. Fortified heritage has values similar to other forms of urban heritage but it also possesses values that are unique to this form of architecture and landscape. This paper sets out the values that should be taken into consideration when carrying out an adaptive reuse project on fortified heritage. Based on research and on international charters, as well as the writers’ own experience, the paper identifies seven values and makes a distinction between two groups of values, namely: intrinsic (history, memory and identity; scientific and technical; territorial and architectural) and extrinsic (landscape and aesthetic; environmental sustainability; social and cultural; economic). While intrinsic values of fortified heritage are usually well described, less explored are the issues of extrinsic values. The paper presents two case studies, Zamość Fortress and Fort St Elmo, and considers how these values were taken into account in the respective projects.","PeriodicalId":41312,"journal":{"name":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46284/mkd.2023.11.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The last decades have brought a growing interest in fortified heritage research, protection and reuse in Europe as a result of the demilitarisation of numerous historic defence structures occupied by armies in many countries and used as service facilities during the Cold War. There are various approaches to the conservation of fortified heritage and adaptive reuse is one of them. The values associated with a site should constitute the departure and arrival point for any type of intervention. An essential part of the process therefore should be the appropriate identification of these values to base on them contemporary actions. Fortified heritage has values similar to other forms of urban heritage but it also possesses values that are unique to this form of architecture and landscape. This paper sets out the values that should be taken into consideration when carrying out an adaptive reuse project on fortified heritage. Based on research and on international charters, as well as the writers’ own experience, the paper identifies seven values and makes a distinction between two groups of values, namely: intrinsic (history, memory and identity; scientific and technical; territorial and architectural) and extrinsic (landscape and aesthetic; environmental sustainability; social and cultural; economic). While intrinsic values of fortified heritage are usually well described, less explored are the issues of extrinsic values. The paper presents two case studies, Zamość Fortress and Fort St Elmo, and considers how these values were taken into account in the respective projects.
在过去的几十年里,由于在许多国家被军队占领并在冷战期间被用作服务设施的许多历史防御结构的非军事化,欧洲对强化遗产的研究、保护和再利用的兴趣日益浓厚。强化遗产的保护方法多种多样,适应性再利用是其中之一。与场地相关的价值应构成任何类型干预的出发点和落脚点。因此,这一进程的一个重要部分应该是适当地确定这些价值,并以此为基础采取当代行动。强化遗产与其他形式的城市遗产具有相似的价值,但它也具有这种建筑和景观形式的独特价值。本文阐述了在对强化遗产进行适应性再利用项目时应考虑的价值。本文在研究的基础上,以国际宪章为依据,结合作者自身的经验,确定了七种价值观,并将其分为两类:内在价值观(历史、记忆和认同);科学技术;地域和建筑)和外在(景观和美学;环境可持续性;社会和文化;经济)。虽然强化遗产的内在价值通常被很好地描述,但较少探索的是外在价值问题。本文介绍了两个案例研究,Zamość Fortress和Fort St Elmo,并考虑了如何在各自的项目中考虑这些价值。