Open-air Museums – the Future of the Presentation of Spiritual and Architectural Heritage

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lucie Rychnová, Patrik Maturkanič, Katarína Slobodová Nováková, M. Pavliková
{"title":"Open-air Museums – the Future of the Presentation of Spiritual and Architectural Heritage","authors":"Lucie Rychnová, Patrik Maturkanič, Katarína Slobodová Nováková, M. Pavliková","doi":"10.46284/mkd.2022.10.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origins of “open-air museums” date back to the nineteenth century and from the very beginning were closely linked to efforts to capture, preserve and present folk culture. However, during the course of the twentieth century, especially in its later part, the concept of open-air museums began to expand. Open-air museums were founded that focused on urban, industrial and military environments, ecological issues, or on charting the life of prehistoric and ancient cultures. Along with this, the methodological concept for this specific type of institution saw some development, and the interdisciplinary approaches expanded in response, covering a wide range of humanities as well as natural sciences. Besides the academic approach, a social and community overlap is also required from these institutions. This article poses the question of how the concept of open-air museums can continue to develop and what direction the role of presenting cultural heritage in an open landscape could take in the future. The arguments herein are based on the philosophical and spiritual dimension of man’s dwelling in the world and his relationship to the landscape in which he lives. We believe that the future of open-air museums should, wherever possible, focus on the preservation of monuments in their historical context and especially in their natural links in terms of landscape, urbanism and architecture. To ensure this concept remains sustainable, it is necessary that these monuments be involved in the life of villages and communities, ideally also on the basis of cooperation between academia and local entities, which are usually villages or municipalities and citizens’ initiatives. Examples of such a direction can be seen in the founding and running of Rochus Park in the Uherské Hradiště region and in the concept of the association of villages called Mariánská zahrada in the Jičín region, both in the Czech Republic.","PeriodicalId":41312,"journal":{"name":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46284/mkd.2022.10.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The origins of “open-air museums” date back to the nineteenth century and from the very beginning were closely linked to efforts to capture, preserve and present folk culture. However, during the course of the twentieth century, especially in its later part, the concept of open-air museums began to expand. Open-air museums were founded that focused on urban, industrial and military environments, ecological issues, or on charting the life of prehistoric and ancient cultures. Along with this, the methodological concept for this specific type of institution saw some development, and the interdisciplinary approaches expanded in response, covering a wide range of humanities as well as natural sciences. Besides the academic approach, a social and community overlap is also required from these institutions. This article poses the question of how the concept of open-air museums can continue to develop and what direction the role of presenting cultural heritage in an open landscape could take in the future. The arguments herein are based on the philosophical and spiritual dimension of man’s dwelling in the world and his relationship to the landscape in which he lives. We believe that the future of open-air museums should, wherever possible, focus on the preservation of monuments in their historical context and especially in their natural links in terms of landscape, urbanism and architecture. To ensure this concept remains sustainable, it is necessary that these monuments be involved in the life of villages and communities, ideally also on the basis of cooperation between academia and local entities, which are usually villages or municipalities and citizens’ initiatives. Examples of such a direction can be seen in the founding and running of Rochus Park in the Uherské Hradiště region and in the concept of the association of villages called Mariánská zahrada in the Jičín region, both in the Czech Republic.
露天博物馆——精神和建筑遗产展示的未来
“露天博物馆”的起源可以追溯到19世纪,从一开始就与捕捉、保存和展示民间文化的努力密切相关。然而,在20世纪的过程中,特别是在其后期,露天博物馆的概念开始扩大。人们建立了露天博物馆,重点关注城市、工业和军事环境、生态问题,或描绘史前和古代文化的生活。与此同时,这种特定类型机构的方法论概念也得到了一些发展,跨学科的方法也随之扩展,涵盖了广泛的人文科学和自然科学。除了学术方法外,这些机构还需要社会和社区的重叠。本文提出了露天博物馆的概念如何继续发展,以及在未来露天景观中展示文化遗产的角色将走向何方的问题。这里的论点是基于人类在世界上居住的哲学和精神层面,以及他与他所生活的景观的关系。我们认为,未来的露天博物馆应尽可能注重古迹在其历史背景下的保护,特别是在景观、城市化和建筑方面的自然联系。为了确保这一概念的可持续性,有必要将这些纪念碑纳入村庄和社区的生活中,最好是在学术界和当地实体(通常是村庄或市政当局和公民倡议)之间合作的基础上。这一方向的例子可以在乌赫斯科维尔Hradiště地区的Rochus公园的建立和运营,以及Jičín地区名为Mariánská zahrada的村庄协会的概念中看到,两者都在捷克共和国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信