Temporal Analysis of Information Technology Chargeback Systems

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
D. Drury
{"title":"Temporal Analysis of Information Technology Chargeback Systems","authors":"D. Drury","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998040101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planning and controlling information technology remains a management priority in the 1990s. The importance of effectively using the substantial investment is increasing with rapid technological change and competition. Effectively using the information processing resource is becoming a management priority. Since initial implementations, effectively using information processing resources has been difficult. With the pace of technological change, increasing investments, and a growing diversity of users and usages, the importance of effective cost control has increased. A widely advocated method of bringing order to this state of affairs is the use of a chargeback system whereby users are charged and made responsible for the information costs which they incur. From the earliest applications, some organizations have adopted chargeback systems. While there have been studies in the intervening period on chargeback systems, chargeback remains a controversial management technique. In 1980, a study was conducted on the usage and practices of chargeback systems. This same set of companies recently provided information about their current practices. This paper reports the findings of the temporal comparison. The results suggest that chargeback is not a panacea. Further, the objectives in using, or not using chargeback systems have changed substantially. A new set of problems has emerged. Organizations are having difficulty adapting the chargeback approach. There is less satisfaction in using them, although chargeback systems are still widely used. The final section of the paper addresses reasons for these changes and suggests issues which have yet to be resolved in using chargeback effectively in the emerging information technology environment.","PeriodicalId":44735,"journal":{"name":"Information Resources Management Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Resources Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998040101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Planning and controlling information technology remains a management priority in the 1990s. The importance of effectively using the substantial investment is increasing with rapid technological change and competition. Effectively using the information processing resource is becoming a management priority. Since initial implementations, effectively using information processing resources has been difficult. With the pace of technological change, increasing investments, and a growing diversity of users and usages, the importance of effective cost control has increased. A widely advocated method of bringing order to this state of affairs is the use of a chargeback system whereby users are charged and made responsible for the information costs which they incur. From the earliest applications, some organizations have adopted chargeback systems. While there have been studies in the intervening period on chargeback systems, chargeback remains a controversial management technique. In 1980, a study was conducted on the usage and practices of chargeback systems. This same set of companies recently provided information about their current practices. This paper reports the findings of the temporal comparison. The results suggest that chargeback is not a panacea. Further, the objectives in using, or not using chargeback systems have changed substantially. A new set of problems has emerged. Organizations are having difficulty adapting the chargeback approach. There is less satisfaction in using them, although chargeback systems are still widely used. The final section of the paper addresses reasons for these changes and suggests issues which have yet to be resolved in using chargeback effectively in the emerging information technology environment.
信息技术退款制度的时间分析
规划和控制信息技术仍然是1990年代管理的优先事项。随着技术的迅速变化和竞争,有效利用大量投资的重要性日益增加。有效地利用信息处理资源正成为管理的优先事项。自最初实现以来,有效地利用信息处理资源一直是困难的。随着技术变革的步伐,投资的增加,以及用户和用途的日益多样化,有效的成本控制的重要性已经增加。一种被广泛提倡的整顿这种状况的方法是使用收费制度,即向用户收费并对他们所产生的信息费用负责。从最早的应用开始,一些组织就采用了退款系统。虽然在此期间有关于退款制度的研究,但退款仍然是一种有争议的管理技术。1980年,对退款制度的使用和实践进行了一项研究。这同一组公司最近提供了有关其当前做法的信息。本文报告了时间比较的结果。结果表明,退款不是万灵药。此外,使用或不使用退款系统的目标也发生了重大变化。出现了一系列新的问题。组织难以适应退款方法。尽管退款系统仍在广泛使用,但使用它们的满意度较低。论文的最后一部分阐述了这些变化的原因,并提出了在新兴信息技术环境中有效使用退款尚未解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Resources Management Journal
Information Resources Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Topics should be drawn from, but not limited to, the following areas, with major emphasis on the managerial and organizational aspects of information resource and technology management: •Application of IT to operation •Artificial intelligence and expert systems technologies and issues •Business process management and modeling •Data warehousing and mining •Database management technologies and issues •Decision support and group decision support systems •Distance learning technologies and issues •Distributed software development •E-collaboration •Electronic commerce technologies and issues •Electronic government •Emerging technologies management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信