{"title":"Is IS Research on GSS Relevant","authors":"Munir Mandviwalla, P. Gray","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998010104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"In most business organizations today, when groups of executives meet, they gather in a room that is little different from the one in which their predecessors met a hundred or more years ago. Technology is evident only in the electric light, the air conditioning, and perhaps a telephone. The information available during the deliberations is a few memoranda or a notebook of financial and other reports. They may receive verbal briefings made with the aid of charts or slides. However, as discussion proceeds around the table and various alternatives are considered, the decision makers have to rely principally on what is in their heads and what has been told them.\" Gray et al. 1981 in one of the early papers on GSS/ GDSS research. After more than a decade of advances in GSS research the above description is still accurate in most companies. If relevancy strictly means having a significant impact on the business world then GSS research appears to have had minimal impact. In this paper we try to understand the reasons for the low impact, point out areas of success, and look for directions for the future. Several of the points raised in this article are well known and some of our recommendations are already being implemented independently by many researchers. The contribution of this article is in presenting a comprehensive and formal discussion of the \"state of the GSS field\" based on an analysis of IS research on GSS. Our goal is to motivate constructive forward-looking debate on this important topic. To promote such debate we have prepared a working paper on a web site to allow readers to further explore our GSS literature database see Appendix A.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998010104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
"In most business organizations today, when groups of executives meet, they gather in a room that is little different from the one in which their predecessors met a hundred or more years ago. Technology is evident only in the electric light, the air conditioning, and perhaps a telephone. The information available during the deliberations is a few memoranda or a notebook of financial and other reports. They may receive verbal briefings made with the aid of charts or slides. However, as discussion proceeds around the table and various alternatives are considered, the decision makers have to rely principally on what is in their heads and what has been told them." Gray et al. 1981 in one of the early papers on GSS/ GDSS research. After more than a decade of advances in GSS research the above description is still accurate in most companies. If relevancy strictly means having a significant impact on the business world then GSS research appears to have had minimal impact. In this paper we try to understand the reasons for the low impact, point out areas of success, and look for directions for the future. Several of the points raised in this article are well known and some of our recommendations are already being implemented independently by many researchers. The contribution of this article is in presenting a comprehensive and formal discussion of the "state of the GSS field" based on an analysis of IS research on GSS. Our goal is to motivate constructive forward-looking debate on this important topic. To promote such debate we have prepared a working paper on a web site to allow readers to further explore our GSS literature database see Appendix A.
“在今天的大多数商业组织中,当高管们开会时,他们聚集的房间与100多年前他们的前辈们开会的房间几乎没有什么不同。科技只在电灯、空调,也许还有电话中体现出来。审议期间可获得的资料是一些备忘录或财务报告和其他报告的笔记本。他们可以接受借助图表或幻灯片所作的口头简报。然而,随着讨论的进行和各种备选方案的考虑,决策者不得不主要依靠他们头脑中的想法和别人告诉他们的东西。”Gray et al. 1981,在GSS/ GDSS研究的早期论文之一。在GSS研究取得了十多年的进展之后,上述描述在大多数公司仍然是准确的。如果相关性严格地意味着对商业世界产生重大影响,那么GSS研究的影响似乎微乎其微。在本文中,我们试图了解低影响的原因,指出成功的领域,并寻找未来的方向。本文中提出的一些观点是众所周知的,我们的一些建议已经被许多研究人员独立地实施。本文的贡献是在分析is对GSS的研究的基础上,对“GSS领域的现状”进行了全面而正式的讨论。我们的目标是推动就这一重要议题进行建设性的前瞻性辩论。为了促进这样的辩论,我们在一个网站上准备了一份工作文件,让读者进一步探索我们的GSS文献数据库(见附录a)。
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.