The challenge of relating IS research to practice

IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
J. Senn
{"title":"The challenge of relating IS research to practice","authors":"J. Senn","doi":"10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The academic IS community is following slowly.\" \"The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable.\" \"If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?\" \"If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue.\" These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.","PeriodicalId":44735,"journal":{"name":"Information Resources Management Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Resources Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.1998010103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

"The academic IS community is following slowly." "The work is not relevant, reachable, or readable." "If they've never personally done it, how can they possibly advise someone?" "If I want to know what works or what's being tried, I'll pick up the phone and get a hold of my counterpart in other companies...With few exceptions, the academic IS community doesn't have a clue." These, and a substantial number of other highly critical comments, made by chief information officers in major corporations, were captured during the course of structured interviews conducted with information technology professionals participating in a research program currently in process 1 Senn, 1997. They are representative of many similar expressions concerning university-based information systems research. Moreover, they appear to be consistent with assessments and impressions sensed by many persons conducting information systems research from an academic home base. Judging from the apparent frequency and consistency of these judgments, it is evident that a sizeable portion of the practitioner community does not value the research conducted by information systems IS scholars. This paper explores the challenge of relating IS research to practice. It suggests alternatives for researchers to consider if they seek an impact on practice and an ongoing communication link with practitioners.
将信息系统研究与实践联系起来的挑战
“学术界正在慢慢跟进。”“这篇文章没有相关性、可及性或可读性。”“如果他们从来没有亲自做过,他们怎么可能给别人提建议呢?”“如果我想知道什么有效,或者什么正在尝试,我会拿起电话,联系其他公司的同事……除了少数例外,IS学术界对此毫无头绪。”这些,以及其他大量由大公司的首席信息官提出的高度批评的评论,都是在与信息技术专业人员进行结构化访谈的过程中被捕获的,这些信息技术专业人员参与了一个研究项目,目前正在进行过程1 (Senn, 1997)。它们是许多关于大学信息系统研究的类似表达的代表。此外,它们似乎与许多在学术基地从事信息系统研究的人所感受到的评价和印象是一致的。从这些判断的明显频率和一致性来看,很明显,相当大一部分从业者社区并不重视信息系统is学者所进行的研究。本文探讨了将信息系统研究与实践联系起来的挑战。如果研究人员寻求对实践的影响和与从业者的持续沟通联系,它建议他们考虑其他选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Resources Management Journal
Information Resources Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Topics should be drawn from, but not limited to, the following areas, with major emphasis on the managerial and organizational aspects of information resource and technology management: •Application of IT to operation •Artificial intelligence and expert systems technologies and issues •Business process management and modeling •Data warehousing and mining •Database management technologies and issues •Decision support and group decision support systems •Distance learning technologies and issues •Distributed software development •E-collaboration •Electronic commerce technologies and issues •Electronic government •Emerging technologies management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信