A Study on the Effect of Comprehensive Intervention Based on Transition Theory on the Readiness for Discharge of Post-Operative Breast Cancer Patients

Na Li, Wanwei Huang, Lijun Jiang, Lijun Zhang, Xiao-Li Lin, Haiting Wu, Yuting Huang, Yue Li
{"title":"A Study on the Effect of Comprehensive Intervention Based on Transition Theory on the Readiness for Discharge of Post-Operative Breast Cancer Patients","authors":"Na Li, Wanwei Huang, Lijun Jiang, Lijun Zhang, Xiao-Li Lin, Haiting Wu, Yuting Huang, Yue Li","doi":"10.4236/abcr.2022.112011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention based on transition theory in enhancing the readiness for discharge of post-operative breast cancer patients. Method: In a non-simultaneous controlled study test, 99 post-operative breast cancer patients hospitalized between August 2019 and February 2020 were selected as the control group and 93 post-operative breast cancer patients hospitalized between March and August 2020 were selected as the test group at a Grade A tertiary tumor hospital. While the control group used the conventional care model, the test group added a comprehensive intervention based on transition theory to the routine nursing, which focused on stimulating patients’ awareness of health transitions, assisting patients to identify health critical events, strengthening social support and promoting self-management. The differences between the two groups were compared in terms of patient readiness for discharge and patient evaluation of the quality of discharge teaching. Result: The total score of readiness for discharge was higher in the test group than in the control group (171.7 ± 24.5 vs. 155.9 ± 28.9) and the scores for “Self-condition” (55.6 ± 8.2 vs. 50.8 ± 9.7), “Disease Knowledge” (64.7 ± 13.1 vs. 57.7 ± 13.8), “Coping Ability after Discharge” (24.6 ± 4.8 vs. 22.2 ± 5.6), “Expected Social Support after Discharge” (26.8 ± 4.5 vs. 25.2 ± 4.8) were higher than those of the control group, and all differences were statistically significant “Content that Patients Actually Acquired before Discharge” (51.2 ± 9.2 vs. 48.3 ± 11.3) and “Guiding Skills and Effects of Discharge for Nurses” (110.9 ± 12.6 vs. 104.3 ± 19.00) were also higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive intervention based on transition theory for post-operative breast cancer patients is beneficial to improve the quality of discharge nursing guidance, thereby improving the readiness for discharge of patients and enhancing the sense of control and identity of patients after discharge.","PeriodicalId":67095,"journal":{"name":"乳腺癌(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"乳腺癌(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2022.112011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention based on transition theory in enhancing the readiness for discharge of post-operative breast cancer patients. Method: In a non-simultaneous controlled study test, 99 post-operative breast cancer patients hospitalized between August 2019 and February 2020 were selected as the control group and 93 post-operative breast cancer patients hospitalized between March and August 2020 were selected as the test group at a Grade A tertiary tumor hospital. While the control group used the conventional care model, the test group added a comprehensive intervention based on transition theory to the routine nursing, which focused on stimulating patients’ awareness of health transitions, assisting patients to identify health critical events, strengthening social support and promoting self-management. The differences between the two groups were compared in terms of patient readiness for discharge and patient evaluation of the quality of discharge teaching. Result: The total score of readiness for discharge was higher in the test group than in the control group (171.7 ± 24.5 vs. 155.9 ± 28.9) and the scores for “Self-condition” (55.6 ± 8.2 vs. 50.8 ± 9.7), “Disease Knowledge” (64.7 ± 13.1 vs. 57.7 ± 13.8), “Coping Ability after Discharge” (24.6 ± 4.8 vs. 22.2 ± 5.6), “Expected Social Support after Discharge” (26.8 ± 4.5 vs. 25.2 ± 4.8) were higher than those of the control group, and all differences were statistically significant “Content that Patients Actually Acquired before Discharge” (51.2 ± 9.2 vs. 48.3 ± 11.3) and “Guiding Skills and Effects of Discharge for Nurses” (110.9 ± 12.6 vs. 104.3 ± 19.00) were also higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive intervention based on transition theory for post-operative breast cancer patients is beneficial to improve the quality of discharge nursing guidance, thereby improving the readiness for discharge of patients and enhancing the sense of control and identity of patients after discharge.
基于过渡理论的综合干预对乳腺癌术后患者出院准备程度的影响研究
目的:探讨基于过渡理论的综合干预对提高乳腺癌术后患者出院准备的作用。方法:选取某三级甲等肿瘤医院2019年8月至2020年2月住院的乳腺癌术后患者99例为对照组,2020年3月至8月住院的乳腺癌术后患者93例为实验组,采用非同时对照研究试验。对照组采用常规护理模式,试验组在常规护理的基础上增加了基于转变理论的综合干预,重点是激发患者健康转变意识,帮助患者识别健康关键事件,加强社会支持,促进自我管理。比较两组患者出院准备情况和患者对出院教学质量的评价。结果:实验组出院准备总分高于对照组(171.7±24.5比155.9±28.9),“自我状态”得分(55.6±8.2比50.8±9.7),“疾病知识”得分(64.7±13.1比57.7±13.8),“出院后应对能力”得分(24.6±4.8比22.2±5.6),“出院后期望社会支持”得分(26.8±4.5比25.2±4.8)高于对照组。“患者出院前实际获得的内容”(51.2±9.2比48.3±11.3)和“护士出院指导技巧及效果”(110.9±12.6比104.3±19.00)均高于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论:基于过渡理论对乳腺癌术后患者进行综合干预,有利于提高出院护理指导质量,从而提高患者的出院准备程度,增强患者出院后的控制感和认同感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信