Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. G. Blanco
{"title":"Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis","authors":"A. G. Blanco","doi":"10.3917/rip.292.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?","PeriodicalId":44846,"journal":{"name":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?
走向晚期福柯的文学政治:直言与模仿
这篇文章认为,在福柯后期的作品中,我们发现的不是对文学的遗忘,而是对文学在他的作品中所占据的角色的重新表述,而且,在这部后期的作品中,有他在20世纪60年代到70年代中期所写的关于文学思想的文本的痕迹。借鉴福柯的后期作品,我重新思考了一个关键问题:文学,作为文学,与话语的政治维度有什么关系?这必然与关于文学真实性的经典问题密切相关:文学如何讲述真相?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信