Vers un cadre de la régulation des plateformes ?

Q4 Social Sciences
Vassilis Hatzopoulos
{"title":"Vers un cadre de la régulation des plateformes ?","authors":"Vassilis Hatzopoulos","doi":"10.3917/ride.333.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishThe platform economy leads to the disruption of known legal categories. The regulatory vacuum in which it has so far flourished is now showing its limitations. Does this mean that we need to adopt “traditional” regulatory measures and, if so, in what areas? How should we consider the powerful mechanisms of self-regulation developed by platforms and make them more effective? How are they to be tamed and made to serve the public, rather than the private, interest? These are some of the questions discussed in the present contribution. francaisL’economie des plateformes entraine la perturbation (disruption) des categories juridiques connues. Le vide reglementaire dans lequel elle a su se developper montre actuellement ses limites. A present, doit-on adopter des mesures reglementaires « classiques » et, dans l’affirmative, dans quels domaines ? Comment tenir compte des mecanismes puissants d’autoregulation deja developpes par les plateformes et les rendre plus efficaces ? Quel type de regulation externe serait propice pour exploiter au mieux les mecanismes du marche, tout en les mettant au service de l’interet general ?","PeriodicalId":39409,"journal":{"name":"Revue Internationale de Droit Economique","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Internationale de Droit Economique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.333.0399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

EnglishThe platform economy leads to the disruption of known legal categories. The regulatory vacuum in which it has so far flourished is now showing its limitations. Does this mean that we need to adopt “traditional” regulatory measures and, if so, in what areas? How should we consider the powerful mechanisms of self-regulation developed by platforms and make them more effective? How are they to be tamed and made to serve the public, rather than the private, interest? These are some of the questions discussed in the present contribution. francaisL’economie des plateformes entraine la perturbation (disruption) des categories juridiques connues. Le vide reglementaire dans lequel elle a su se developper montre actuellement ses limites. A present, doit-on adopter des mesures reglementaires « classiques » et, dans l’affirmative, dans quels domaines ? Comment tenir compte des mecanismes puissants d’autoregulation deja developpes par les plateformes et les rendre plus efficaces ? Quel type de regulation externe serait propice pour exploiter au mieux les mecanismes du marche, tout en les mettant au service de l’interet general ?
走向平台监管框架?
平台经济导致了已知法律类别的瓦解。迄今为止,监管真空使其蓬勃发展,现在正显示出其局限性。这是否意味着我们需要采取“传统”的监管措施?如果是,在哪些方面?我们应该如何考虑平台形成的强大的自我监管机制,并使其更有效?如何驯服他们,使他们服务于公众利益,而不是个人利益?这些是本报告讨论的一些问题。法国“经济的平台entraine la扰动(破坏)的类别司法继续”。在这种情况下,开发人员可能会遇到实际情况的限制。一个现在的、实际的采用者将“度量”定义为“经典”,“确定”,“确定”,“确定”。评论他们的完整的机制,申请人和自动监管机构的发展,共同的平台,共同的效率。Quel类型的监管外部服务设备为开发人员提供了一种复杂的市场机制,提供了一种满足服务需求的互联网通用服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信