An Assessment of Armenia’s Residential Childcare Institutions as a Case Study in International Child Protection

George S. Yacoubian
{"title":"An Assessment of Armenia’s Residential Childcare Institutions as a Case Study in International Child Protection","authors":"George S. Yacoubian","doi":"10.4236/aasoci.2022.127026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are more than 150 million orphaned children worldwide, representing a significant challenge for stakeholders devoted to international child protection. The “best interests of the child” standard requires that all protective decisions be made to ensure each child’s comfort and security. In early 2020 an empirical study was undertaken in Armenia’s residential childcare institutions to examine six constructs: abuse and neglect, education, food safety, hy-giene, institutionalization and reunification, and sexual abuse. While institutionalization has historically been considered contrary to a child’s best interests, results from the current study suggest that residential childcare alternatives may advance childcare protection. Rather than reflexively rejecting residential care, which may deny vulnerable children a safe haven during times of crisis, emotional stability during formative years, an improved standard of living, and superior long-term academic and professional opportunities, deci-sionmakers should weigh the consequences of child rearing with biological parents against all alternative environments, including institutionalization.","PeriodicalId":89876,"journal":{"name":"Advances in applied sociology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in applied sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2022.127026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There are more than 150 million orphaned children worldwide, representing a significant challenge for stakeholders devoted to international child protection. The “best interests of the child” standard requires that all protective decisions be made to ensure each child’s comfort and security. In early 2020 an empirical study was undertaken in Armenia’s residential childcare institutions to examine six constructs: abuse and neglect, education, food safety, hy-giene, institutionalization and reunification, and sexual abuse. While institutionalization has historically been considered contrary to a child’s best interests, results from the current study suggest that residential childcare alternatives may advance childcare protection. Rather than reflexively rejecting residential care, which may deny vulnerable children a safe haven during times of crisis, emotional stability during formative years, an improved standard of living, and superior long-term academic and professional opportunities, deci-sionmakers should weigh the consequences of child rearing with biological parents against all alternative environments, including institutionalization.
以国际儿童保护为例的亚美尼亚寄宿托儿机构评估
全世界有超过1.5亿孤儿,这对致力于国际儿童保护的利益攸关方来说是一个重大挑战。“儿童的最大利益”标准要求作出所有保护性决定,以确保每个儿童的舒适和安全。2020年初,在亚美尼亚的寄宿托儿机构进行了一项实证研究,以检查六种结构:虐待和忽视、教育、食品安全、卫生、制度化和统一以及性虐待。虽然制度化历来被认为与儿童的最大利益背道而驰,但目前的研究结果表明,寄宿儿童保育的替代方案可能会促进儿童保育保护。而不是条件反射性地拒绝住宿照顾,这可能会使脆弱的孩子在危机时期失去安全的避风港,在成长时期失去情绪稳定,生活水平的提高,以及优越的长期学术和职业机会,决策者应该权衡与亲生父母一起抚养孩子的后果和所有其他环境,包括机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信