North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ceinwen Thomas
{"title":"North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security","authors":"Ceinwen Thomas","doi":"10.4324/9781315738321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security Simon Shen, ed. New York: Routledge. 2015. 175 pp. Hardcover, $160.00, ISBN 978-1- 1388-2855-1.Since the early 1990s, the North Korean nuclear issue has represented the most controversial point in the analysis of the security regime of Northeast Asia. After the end of the Cold War, scholars, analysts and politicians form all over the world started to predict the imminent and sudden collapse of North Korean regime. It was assumed that this would have been followed by the reunification of the peninsula under the auspices of the Western- style liberal democratic system that had triumphed in South Korea after the democratization process of 1987. Reality, however, proved far outside the predictions of Francis Fukuyama's \"end of history.\"Pyongyang's regime, aiming at acquiring an adequate instrument of defence and survival, embarked on the development of a military nuclear programme, that caused serious concern, not only for South Korea and Japan, but for all the major powers involved in the security regime of Northeast Asia and/or in the struggle against global nuclear proliferation.From that moment onward, a vast amount of literature has been dedicated to analysing the so- called \"North Korean nuclear issue.\" In particular, the scholars and pundits alike have been drawn to considerations of the consequences for the region as a whole and for relations among the major powers involved.The book, North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security, edited by Simon Shen, is part of a broader effort to study the consequences of the second nuclear crisis. This period started from between the end of 2002 to the beginning of 2003, following the presumed discovery of a uranium enrichment program in North Korea and Pyongyang's subsequently withdrew from the Non- Proliferation Treaty. The second stage in the crisis, from 2006 to 2009, was characterized by two underground nuclear tests and the failure of the Six- Party Talks, the multilateral solution created to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue. The essays that form the volume were originally published in December 2011; obviously, for this reason, the analysis cannot take into account the recent development on the peninsula, nonetheless, many of the conclusions reached by the authors are still valid today.The main characteristic of the book, representing both a point of strength and a weakness, is the heterogeneity of the perspectives through which the North Korean nuclear issue is understood. On the one hand, this diversity creates a certain degree of confusion in the reader, on the other, it offers the reader a broader view of the issues, moving beyond traditional security approaches which monopolize the analysis of the Korean Peninsula. While reading the volume, we pass from essays that make a wide use of international relations theory to discuss relations among states in the region, to analysis of the domestic dimensions of the various actors involved. It is the latter that tend to catch the eye of the reader, as these perspectives are often absent in studies of the North Korean nuclear issue.Although there is no formal division within the volume, the essays can be divided following two different criteria. The first draws a separation between the Korean peninsula (the first three essays), and the interests of the major powers of the region-China, United States, Japan and Russia-in the North Korean nuclear issue. The second criteria is more subtle, but it is also the more interesting as it divides the volume between a traditional security and international relations (Simon Shen and Denny Roy) approach and a focus on how domestic politics impact the North Korean nuclear issue (Rajaram Panda, Steve Lok- Wai Chung, Mong Cheung and Chi- kit Leung). Both in terms of political and social debate (Chung and Cheung) and of foreign policy making inside the country (Panda and Leung).The first essay, authored by Simon Shen, analyses the problem of nuclear proliferation through the Waltzian theory of international relations and proliferation. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security Simon Shen, ed. New York: Routledge. 2015. 175 pp. Hardcover, $160.00, ISBN 978-1- 1388-2855-1.Since the early 1990s, the North Korean nuclear issue has represented the most controversial point in the analysis of the security regime of Northeast Asia. After the end of the Cold War, scholars, analysts and politicians form all over the world started to predict the imminent and sudden collapse of North Korean regime. It was assumed that this would have been followed by the reunification of the peninsula under the auspices of the Western- style liberal democratic system that had triumphed in South Korea after the democratization process of 1987. Reality, however, proved far outside the predictions of Francis Fukuyama's "end of history."Pyongyang's regime, aiming at acquiring an adequate instrument of defence and survival, embarked on the development of a military nuclear programme, that caused serious concern, not only for South Korea and Japan, but for all the major powers involved in the security regime of Northeast Asia and/or in the struggle against global nuclear proliferation.From that moment onward, a vast amount of literature has been dedicated to analysing the so- called "North Korean nuclear issue." In particular, the scholars and pundits alike have been drawn to considerations of the consequences for the region as a whole and for relations among the major powers involved.The book, North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security, edited by Simon Shen, is part of a broader effort to study the consequences of the second nuclear crisis. This period started from between the end of 2002 to the beginning of 2003, following the presumed discovery of a uranium enrichment program in North Korea and Pyongyang's subsequently withdrew from the Non- Proliferation Treaty. The second stage in the crisis, from 2006 to 2009, was characterized by two underground nuclear tests and the failure of the Six- Party Talks, the multilateral solution created to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue. The essays that form the volume were originally published in December 2011; obviously, for this reason, the analysis cannot take into account the recent development on the peninsula, nonetheless, many of the conclusions reached by the authors are still valid today.The main characteristic of the book, representing both a point of strength and a weakness, is the heterogeneity of the perspectives through which the North Korean nuclear issue is understood. On the one hand, this diversity creates a certain degree of confusion in the reader, on the other, it offers the reader a broader view of the issues, moving beyond traditional security approaches which monopolize the analysis of the Korean Peninsula. While reading the volume, we pass from essays that make a wide use of international relations theory to discuss relations among states in the region, to analysis of the domestic dimensions of the various actors involved. It is the latter that tend to catch the eye of the reader, as these perspectives are often absent in studies of the North Korean nuclear issue.Although there is no formal division within the volume, the essays can be divided following two different criteria. The first draws a separation between the Korean peninsula (the first three essays), and the interests of the major powers of the region-China, United States, Japan and Russia-in the North Korean nuclear issue. The second criteria is more subtle, but it is also the more interesting as it divides the volume between a traditional security and international relations (Simon Shen and Denny Roy) approach and a focus on how domestic politics impact the North Korean nuclear issue (Rajaram Panda, Steve Lok- Wai Chung, Mong Cheung and Chi- kit Leung). Both in terms of political and social debate (Chung and Cheung) and of foreign policy making inside the country (Panda and Leung).The first essay, authored by Simon Shen, analyses the problem of nuclear proliferation through the Waltzian theory of international relations and proliferation. …
朝鲜与东北亚地区安全
《朝鲜与东北亚地区安全》沈世文主编,纽约:劳特利奇出版社,2015。175页,精装版,160.00美元,ISBN 978-1- 1388-2855-1。自上世纪90年代初以来,北韩核问题一直是东北亚安全体制分析中争议最大的问题。冷战结束后,世界各地的学者、分析家和政界人士开始预测朝鲜政权即将突然崩溃。人们认为,在1987年民主化进程之后,在韩国取得胜利的西方式自由民主制度的支持下,朝鲜半岛将实现统一。然而,事实证明,事实远非弗朗西斯·福山(Francis Fukuyama)所预言的“历史的终结”。平壤政权的目的是获得适当的防御和生存工具,开始发展军事核计划,这不仅引起了韩国和日本的严重关切,而且引起了参与东北亚安全制度和/或反对全球核扩散斗争的所有主要大国的严重关切。从那一刻起,大量的文献致力于分析所谓的“朝鲜核问题”。特别是,学者和权威人士都被吸引去考虑对整个区域的影响以及对有关大国之间关系的影响。这本名为《朝鲜与东北亚地区安全》的书由沈思蒙编辑,是研究第二次核危机后果的更广泛努力的一部分。这一时期始于2002年底至2003年初,在此之前,人们推测朝鲜发现了一个铀浓缩项目,平壤随后退出了《核不扩散条约》。2006年至2009年是危机的第二阶段,其特点是两次地下核试验和为解决朝鲜核问题而建立的多边解决办法六方会谈失败。文集中的文章最初发表于2011年12月;显然,由于这个原因,分析不能考虑到半岛最近的发展,尽管如此,作者得出的许多结论今天仍然有效。这本书的主要特点是理解北韩核问题的视角的多样性,这既是优点,也是缺点。一方面,这种多样性给读者造成了一定程度的困惑,另一方面,它为读者提供了一个更广阔的问题视野,超越了传统的安全方法,垄断了对朝鲜半岛的分析。在阅读这本书时,我们从广泛运用国际关系理论来讨论该地区国家间关系的文章转向分析所涉及的各种行动者的国内层面。正是后者吸引了读者的眼球,因为这些视角在朝鲜核问题的研究中往往是缺失的。虽然在卷内没有正式的划分,但文章可以按照两个不同的标准进行划分。第一篇文章将朝鲜半岛(前三篇文章)与该地区主要大国——中国、美国、日本和俄罗斯——在朝鲜核问题上的利益区分开来。第二个标准更微妙,但也更有趣,因为它将传统的安全和国际关系方法(沈世文和丹尼罗伊)与关注国内政治如何影响朝鲜核问题(拉贾拉姆熊猫,史蒂夫洛克伟钟,孟张和梁志杰)区分开来。无论是在政治和社会辩论方面(Chung和b张),还是在国内的外交政策制定方面(Panda和Leung)。第一篇文章由西蒙·沈撰写,通过华尔兹的国际关系和扩散理论分析了核扩散问题。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信