Intelligent Security: Is "AI for Cybersecurity" a Blessing or a Curse (Dagstuhl Seminar 22412)

N. Mentens, S. Picek, A. Sadeghi
{"title":"Intelligent Security: Is \"AI for Cybersecurity\" a Blessing or a Curse (Dagstuhl Seminar 22412)","authors":"N. Mentens, S. Picek, A. Sadeghi","doi":"10.4230/DagRep.12.10.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report documents the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22412 “Intelligent Security: Is “AI for Cybersecurity” a Blessing or a Curse”. The seminar brought together 25 attendees from 10 countries (Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA). There were 17 male and 8 female participants. Three participants were from the industry, and the rest were from academia. The gathered researchers are actively working in the domains of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, emphasizing hardware security, fuzzing, physical security, and network security. The seminar aims to foster sharing experiences and best practices between various cybersecurity applications and understand how and when certain approaches are transferable. The first two days were devoted to 20-minute self-introductions by participants to achieve these goals. At the end of the second day, we made a list of topics that were decided to be the focus of the seminar and that will be discussed in the groups in the next few days. On the third and fourth days, the work was conducted in four discussion groups where at the end of each day, all participants gathered to report the results from the discussion groups and to align the goals. On the last day, we again worked in one group to summarize the findings and foster networking among participants. A hike was organized in the afternoon of the third day. The seminar was a success. The participants actively participated in the working groups and the discussions and went home with new ideas and collaborators. This report gathers the abstracts of the presented talks and the conclusions from the discussion groups, which we consider relevant contributions toward better interdisciplinary research on artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.","PeriodicalId":91064,"journal":{"name":"Dagstuhl reports","volume":"319 1","pages":"106-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dagstuhl reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.10.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report documents the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22412 “Intelligent Security: Is “AI for Cybersecurity” a Blessing or a Curse”. The seminar brought together 25 attendees from 10 countries (Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA). There were 17 male and 8 female participants. Three participants were from the industry, and the rest were from academia. The gathered researchers are actively working in the domains of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, emphasizing hardware security, fuzzing, physical security, and network security. The seminar aims to foster sharing experiences and best practices between various cybersecurity applications and understand how and when certain approaches are transferable. The first two days were devoted to 20-minute self-introductions by participants to achieve these goals. At the end of the second day, we made a list of topics that were decided to be the focus of the seminar and that will be discussed in the groups in the next few days. On the third and fourth days, the work was conducted in four discussion groups where at the end of each day, all participants gathered to report the results from the discussion groups and to align the goals. On the last day, we again worked in one group to summarize the findings and foster networking among participants. A hike was organized in the afternoon of the third day. The seminar was a success. The participants actively participated in the working groups and the discussions and went home with new ideas and collaborators. This report gathers the abstracts of the presented talks and the conclusions from the discussion groups, which we consider relevant contributions toward better interdisciplinary research on artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.
智能安全:“网络安全人工智能”是福还是祸(Dagstuhl Seminar 22412)
本报告记录了Dagstuhl研讨会22412“智能安全:人工智能网络安全是福还是祸”的成果。研讨会汇集了来自10个国家(加拿大、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、法国、德国、荷兰、新加坡、瑞典、瑞士和美国)的25名与会者。共有17名男性和8名女性参与者。三位参与者来自业界,其余来自学术界。聚集的研究人员在人工智能和网络安全领域积极工作,强调硬件安全,模糊,物理安全和网络安全。研讨会旨在促进各种网络安全应用之间的经验和最佳实践分享,并了解某些方法如何以及何时可转移。为了实现这些目标,前两天参与者进行了20分钟的自我介绍。在第二天结束时,我们列出了一个主题清单,这些主题将成为研讨会的重点,并将在接下来的几天里在小组中讨论。在第三天和第四天,工作在四个讨论组中进行,在每天结束时,所有参与者聚集在一起报告讨论组的结果并调整目标。在最后一天,我们再次分成一组,总结研究结果,并促进参与者之间的交流。第三天下午组织了一次徒步旅行。研讨会很成功。参与者积极参与工作组和讨论,带着新的想法和合作者回家。本报告收集了报告的摘要和讨论小组的结论,我们认为这对更好地进行人工智能和网络安全的跨学科研究有重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信