Predetermination of root canal lengths in molar teeth: A comparison between radiovisiography and two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam computed tomography

Annil Dhingra, Charu Dayal, Amteshwar Singh, Neetika Bhardwaj
{"title":"Predetermination of root canal lengths in molar teeth: A comparison between radiovisiography and two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam computed tomography","authors":"Annil Dhingra, Charu Dayal, Amteshwar Singh, Neetika Bhardwaj","doi":"10.4103/0975-962X.170377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Obtaining a correct working length is critical to the success of endodontic therapy. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the effect of working length determination using radiovisiography (RVG) and two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular teeth were taken and three groups of 10 each were made. Teeth with previous endodontic treatments, metal restorations, resorptions, incomplete apex formations, and multiple visible foramina were excluded. The root canal length was determined using RVG, CBCT measurement method 2D, and CBCT measurement method 3D. The difference between CBCT measurements, RVG, and the actual canal length were compared to evaluate the accuracy of each method. Results: No significant statistically difference was seen with 3D measurements and actual measurements. Measurements with RVG were better than CBCT 2D. Conclusion: Under experimental conditions, CBCT 3D measurements are accurate than RVG and CBCT 2D in the determination of root canal length.","PeriodicalId":90526,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"195 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.170377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Obtaining a correct working length is critical to the success of endodontic therapy. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the effect of working length determination using radiovisiography (RVG) and two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular teeth were taken and three groups of 10 each were made. Teeth with previous endodontic treatments, metal restorations, resorptions, incomplete apex formations, and multiple visible foramina were excluded. The root canal length was determined using RVG, CBCT measurement method 2D, and CBCT measurement method 3D. The difference between CBCT measurements, RVG, and the actual canal length were compared to evaluate the accuracy of each method. Results: No significant statistically difference was seen with 3D measurements and actual measurements. Measurements with RVG were better than CBCT 2D. Conclusion: Under experimental conditions, CBCT 3D measurements are accurate than RVG and CBCT 2D in the determination of root canal length.
磨牙根管长度的预先测定:放射成像与锥束计算机断层扫描二维和三维测量的比较
获得正确的工作长度是根管治疗成功的关键。本临床研究的目的是比较使用放射成像(RVG)和使用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行二维(2D)和三维(3D)测量的工作长度测定的效果。材料与方法:取下颌牙30颗,分为三组,每组10颗。排除有过牙髓治疗、金属修复、再吸收、牙尖不完整和多个可见牙孔的牙齿。采用RVG、CBCT 2D测量法和CBCT 3D测量法测定根管长度。比较CBCT测量值、RVG和实际根管长度之间的差异,以评估每种方法的准确性。结果:三维测量与实际测量无显著统计学差异。RVG测量优于CBCT 2D。结论:在实验条件下,CBCT 3D测量根管长度比RVG和CBCT 2D测量更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信