A Comparison of Neural Classifiers for Graffiti Recognition

A. H. Al-Fatlawi, S. Ling, H. Lam
{"title":"A Comparison of Neural Classifiers for Graffiti Recognition","authors":"A. H. Al-Fatlawi, S. Ling, H. Lam","doi":"10.4236/JILSA.2014.62008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological \nadvances and the enormous flood of papers have motivated many researchers and \ncompanies to innovate new technologies. In particular, handwriting recognition \nis a very useful technology to support applications like electronic books \n(eBooks), post code readers (that sort mails in post offices), and some bank \napplications. This paper proposes three systems to discriminate handwritten \ngraffiti digits (0 to 9) and some commands with different architectures and \nabilities. It introduces three classifiers, namely single neural network (SNN) \nclassifier, parallel neural networks (PNN) classifier and tree-structured \nneural network (TSNN) classifier. The three classifiers have been designed \nthrough adopting feed forward neural networks. In order to optimize the network \nparameters (connection weights), the back-propagation algorithm has been used. \nSeveral architectures are applied and examined to present a comparative study \nabout these three systems from different perspectives. The research focuses on \nexamining their accuracy, flexibility and scalability. The paper presents an \nanalytical study about the impacts of three factors on the accuracy of the \nsystems and behavior of the neural networks in terms of the number of the \nhidden neurons, the model of the activation functions and the learning rate. \nTherefore, future directions have been considered significantly in this paper \nthrough designing particularly flexible systems that allow adding many more \nclasses in the future without retraining the current neural networks.","PeriodicalId":69452,"journal":{"name":"智能学习系统与应用(英文)","volume":"33 1","pages":"94-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"智能学习系统与应用(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JILSA.2014.62008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Technological advances and the enormous flood of papers have motivated many researchers and companies to innovate new technologies. In particular, handwriting recognition is a very useful technology to support applications like electronic books (eBooks), post code readers (that sort mails in post offices), and some bank applications. This paper proposes three systems to discriminate handwritten graffiti digits (0 to 9) and some commands with different architectures and abilities. It introduces three classifiers, namely single neural network (SNN) classifier, parallel neural networks (PNN) classifier and tree-structured neural network (TSNN) classifier. The three classifiers have been designed through adopting feed forward neural networks. In order to optimize the network parameters (connection weights), the back-propagation algorithm has been used. Several architectures are applied and examined to present a comparative study about these three systems from different perspectives. The research focuses on examining their accuracy, flexibility and scalability. The paper presents an analytical study about the impacts of three factors on the accuracy of the systems and behavior of the neural networks in terms of the number of the hidden neurons, the model of the activation functions and the learning rate. Therefore, future directions have been considered significantly in this paper through designing particularly flexible systems that allow adding many more classes in the future without retraining the current neural networks.
用于涂鸦识别的神经分类器的比较
技术的进步和大量的论文促使许多研究人员和公司创新新技术。特别是,手写识别是一种非常有用的技术,可以支持电子书、邮政编码阅读器(在邮局对邮件进行分类)和一些银行应用程序等应用程序。本文提出了三种识别手写涂鸦数字(0 ~ 9)的系统和一些具有不同架构和能力的命令。介绍了三种分类器,即单神经网络(SNN)分类器、并行神经网络(PNN)分类器和树状神经网络(TSNN)分类器。这三种分类器均采用前馈神经网络设计。为了优化网络参数(连接权值),采用了反向传播算法。本文应用并考察了几种架构,从不同的角度对这三种系统进行了比较研究。研究的重点是检验它们的准确性、灵活性和可扩展性。本文从隐藏神经元数量、激活函数模型和学习率三个方面分析研究了三个因素对系统精度和神经网络行为的影响。因此,本文通过设计特别灵活的系统来考虑未来的方向,这些系统允许在未来添加更多的类,而无需重新训练当前的神经网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信