Some Hematologic Parameters of Blood Donors at the National Blood Transfusion Service (NBTS), Jos, Nigeria

Lugos, Okoh Jb, Polit Uy, V. Ny, Ofojekwu Mjn, Nnanna Ou, Damen Jg, Iheanacho Cu, Ntuhun Bd, Damulak Od
{"title":"Some Hematologic Parameters of Blood Donors at the National Blood Transfusion Service (NBTS), Jos, Nigeria","authors":"Lugos, Okoh Jb, Polit Uy, V. Ny, Ofojekwu Mjn, Nnanna Ou, Damen Jg, Iheanacho Cu, Ntuhun Bd, Damulak Od","doi":"10.4172/2155-9864.1000416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A blood donor is expected to be a healthy individual who donates his or her blood for the medical treatment of patients. World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that only those with good health status should be accepted as blood donors. Full blood count is a standard haematology test that evaluates a blood sample for a variety of basic parameters and partly applicable in the general screening of health. Normal haemoglobin level is one of the requirements for blood donor suitability. Normal haemoglobin alone does not connote normalcy of other haematologic variables. The full blood count of blood donors may reveal other blood measurements that may contribute to the better assessment of donors and standardisation of blood donor selection.Aim: This research is aimed to evaluate some haematological parameters of assumingly healthy volunteer blood donors at the NBTS (National Blood Transfusion Service), in Jos, Plateau State.Methods: A total of 102 potential healthy blood donors from Jos City and Du Village participated in the study. We obtained 2.5 ml of venous blood aseptically from each donor into an EDTA container and mixed. The full blood counts of the samples were all analysed. The values gotten were subjected to statistical analysis using the SPSS version 23 software.Results: The packed cell volume (PCV), total and differential white blood cell counts and platelet count were significantly different compared to local reference ranges. Further, evaluation of the parameters between genders, locations, age groups and occupations of donors, the platelet, PCV and eosinophil counts differed significantly (p=0.042, 0.00 and 0.029 respectively). The average white blood cells (WBC) count was lower among donors in the rural area (p=0.000).Conclusion: There may be a significant number of apparently healthy blood donors with abnormal haematologic parameters. Full blood count should be included in evaluating blood donors to ensure blood and donor safety.","PeriodicalId":73627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of blood disorders & transfusion","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of blood disorders & transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9864.1000416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: A blood donor is expected to be a healthy individual who donates his or her blood for the medical treatment of patients. World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that only those with good health status should be accepted as blood donors. Full blood count is a standard haematology test that evaluates a blood sample for a variety of basic parameters and partly applicable in the general screening of health. Normal haemoglobin level is one of the requirements for blood donor suitability. Normal haemoglobin alone does not connote normalcy of other haematologic variables. The full blood count of blood donors may reveal other blood measurements that may contribute to the better assessment of donors and standardisation of blood donor selection.Aim: This research is aimed to evaluate some haematological parameters of assumingly healthy volunteer blood donors at the NBTS (National Blood Transfusion Service), in Jos, Plateau State.Methods: A total of 102 potential healthy blood donors from Jos City and Du Village participated in the study. We obtained 2.5 ml of venous blood aseptically from each donor into an EDTA container and mixed. The full blood counts of the samples were all analysed. The values gotten were subjected to statistical analysis using the SPSS version 23 software.Results: The packed cell volume (PCV), total and differential white blood cell counts and platelet count were significantly different compared to local reference ranges. Further, evaluation of the parameters between genders, locations, age groups and occupations of donors, the platelet, PCV and eosinophil counts differed significantly (p=0.042, 0.00 and 0.029 respectively). The average white blood cells (WBC) count was lower among donors in the rural area (p=0.000).Conclusion: There may be a significant number of apparently healthy blood donors with abnormal haematologic parameters. Full blood count should be included in evaluating blood donors to ensure blood and donor safety.
尼日利亚乔斯国家输血中心献血者的一些血液学参数
献血者应该是一个健康的人,为病人的医疗而献血。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议,只有健康状况良好的人才应被接受为献血者。全血细胞计数是一种标准的血液学测试,用于评估血液样本的各种基本参数,部分适用于一般健康筛查。正常血红蛋白水平是献血者适宜性的要求之一。血红蛋白正常并不意味着其他血液学指标正常。献血者的全血细胞计数可以揭示其他血液测量,有助于更好地评估献血者和标准化献血者的选择。目的:本研究旨在评估高原州乔斯国家输血服务中心(NBTS)假定健康的志愿献血者的一些血液学参数。方法:对来自乔斯市和杜村的102名潜在健康献血者进行研究。我们从每个供者无菌处取2.5 ml静脉血,放入EDTA容器中混合。所有样本的全血细胞计数都进行了分析。所得数据采用SPSS 23版软件进行统计分析。结果:与当地参考值比较,两组患者的堆积细胞体积(PCV)、白细胞总数、白细胞差异数、血小板计数均有显著性差异。不同性别、不同地区、不同年龄、不同职业的献血者血小板、PCV和嗜酸性粒细胞的评价差异有统计学意义(p分别为0.042、0.00和0.029)。农村献血者的平均白细胞计数较低(p=0.000)。结论:可能有大量表面健康的献血者血液学参数异常。在评估献血者时应包括全血细胞计数,以确保血液和献血者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信