Isto é uma brincadeira? Por uma fenomenologia do jogar: o “círculo mágico” como mediador das relações e experiências sociais

Tarcízio Macedo, Otacílio Amaral Filho
{"title":"Isto é uma brincadeira? Por uma fenomenologia do jogar: o “círculo mágico” como mediador das relações e experiências sociais","authors":"Tarcízio Macedo, Otacílio Amaral Filho","doi":"10.4013/VER.2016.30.73.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interactional phenomenological perspective of the play, under the aegis of the “frame of play” or “magic circle”, as mediator to understand the social suggested here is the proposal of a set of questions. Less than the draft of a theory, this work is constructed as a roadmap for development and deployment theoretical and methodological later. We intend to discuss and propose a new interpretation of a classic concept of game studies, the “magic circle”, holding it as another possible social frame and suggesting the existence of a phenomenology of play responsible for mediating social relations and practices from game logic. We believe that this logic of the “magic circle” is extended to simple everyday actions. Our hypothesis is that exists an appropriation and frame (in) aware of the paradoxical character and metacommunicative of the play. We believe that is a crystallization of the play on common sense, as the actors to mediate various social relationships, as opinion and even mask real discursive intentions or acts through linguistic mechanisms commonly evoke them. Keywords: Game Studies, social frameworks, social worlds, magic circle, social experience, Actor-Network Theory.","PeriodicalId":30199,"journal":{"name":"Verso e Reverso","volume":"30 1","pages":"79-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verso e Reverso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/VER.2016.30.73.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The interactional phenomenological perspective of the play, under the aegis of the “frame of play” or “magic circle”, as mediator to understand the social suggested here is the proposal of a set of questions. Less than the draft of a theory, this work is constructed as a roadmap for development and deployment theoretical and methodological later. We intend to discuss and propose a new interpretation of a classic concept of game studies, the “magic circle”, holding it as another possible social frame and suggesting the existence of a phenomenology of play responsible for mediating social relations and practices from game logic. We believe that this logic of the “magic circle” is extended to simple everyday actions. Our hypothesis is that exists an appropriation and frame (in) aware of the paradoxical character and metacommunicative of the play. We believe that is a crystallization of the play on common sense, as the actors to mediate various social relationships, as opinion and even mask real discursive intentions or acts through linguistic mechanisms commonly evoke them. Keywords: Game Studies, social frameworks, social worlds, magic circle, social experience, Actor-Network Theory.
这是在开玩笑吗?游戏现象学:作为关系和社会经验的中介的“魔法圈”
游戏的互动现象学视角,在“游戏框架”或“魔法圈”的庇护下,作为理解社会的中介,这里提出了一系列问题。比起理论的草案,这项工作被构建为稍后的开发和部署理论和方法的路线图。我们打算讨论并提出对游戏研究经典概念“魔法圈”的新解释,将其作为另一种可能的社会框架,并建议存在一种负责从游戏逻辑中调解社会关系和实践的游戏现象学。我们相信,这种“魔法圈”的逻辑可以延伸到简单的日常行为中。我们的假设是存在一种挪用和框架(在)意识到戏剧的矛盾性格和元交际。我们认为这是戏剧对常识的结晶,作为演员调解各种社会关系,作为意见,甚至掩盖真实的话语意图或行为通过语言机制通常唤起他们。关键词:游戏研究,社会框架,社会世界,魔法圈,社会经验,行动者网络理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信