Continuing posterior tibial nerve stimulation after twelve weekly sessions: a randomized controlled trial

Q4 Medicine
J. Zigman, S. Handler, S. Amaya, A. Zeno, Y. Takashima, J. Navas, T. Yazdany
{"title":"Continuing posterior tibial nerve stimulation after twelve weekly sessions: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"J. Zigman, S. Handler, S. Amaya, A. Zeno, Y. Takashima, J. Navas, T. Yazdany","doi":"10.4081/uij.2022.251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) is a treatment option for refractory Overactive Bladder (OAB). There is currently no evidence to support which maintenance schedule is most effective. The objective of this study is to compare patientreported outcomes between monthly maintenance therapy and sessions scheduled Per patient request (PRN). We hypothesized that there is no difference in these measures between groups. After completing 12 sessions of PTNS, patients were randomized to monthly or PRN maintenance. Quality of life, patient satisfaction, and degree of symptom bother were assessed with validated questionnaires. Thirty six patients were randomized: 19 to monthly follow-up, and 17 to PRN follow-up. The PRN group demonstrated a significantly higher quality of life (p=0.04) with a large effect size (0.82). Over a three-month period, there was no significant difference in the average number of visits between the monthly and PRN groups, with an average of 1.79 (±1.18) and 1.24 (±1.35) visits, respectively (p=0.20). After six months of maintenance therapy, 42% of patients in the monthly group and 53% of patients in PRN group elected to continue therapy (p=0.27). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to treatment satisfaction (p=0.62) or percent change in OAB symptoms (p=0.13). There is no difference between monthly and PRN follow-up in terms of patient satisfaction and symptom bother. However, the PRN group scored higher on the quality of life measure. PRN maintenance may optimize care for patients treating Overactive Bladder Syndrome with posterior tibial nerve stimulation.","PeriodicalId":35651,"journal":{"name":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2022.251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) is a treatment option for refractory Overactive Bladder (OAB). There is currently no evidence to support which maintenance schedule is most effective. The objective of this study is to compare patientreported outcomes between monthly maintenance therapy and sessions scheduled Per patient request (PRN). We hypothesized that there is no difference in these measures between groups. After completing 12 sessions of PTNS, patients were randomized to monthly or PRN maintenance. Quality of life, patient satisfaction, and degree of symptom bother were assessed with validated questionnaires. Thirty six patients were randomized: 19 to monthly follow-up, and 17 to PRN follow-up. The PRN group demonstrated a significantly higher quality of life (p=0.04) with a large effect size (0.82). Over a three-month period, there was no significant difference in the average number of visits between the monthly and PRN groups, with an average of 1.79 (±1.18) and 1.24 (±1.35) visits, respectively (p=0.20). After six months of maintenance therapy, 42% of patients in the monthly group and 53% of patients in PRN group elected to continue therapy (p=0.27). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to treatment satisfaction (p=0.62) or percent change in OAB symptoms (p=0.13). There is no difference between monthly and PRN follow-up in terms of patient satisfaction and symptom bother. However, the PRN group scored higher on the quality of life measure. PRN maintenance may optimize care for patients treating Overactive Bladder Syndrome with posterior tibial nerve stimulation.
12周后继续刺激胫骨后神经:一项随机对照试验
胫后神经刺激(PTNS)是治疗难治性膀胱过动症(OAB)的一种选择。目前没有证据支持哪种维护计划是最有效的。本研究的目的是比较患者报告的每月维持治疗和按患者要求安排的疗程(PRN)的结果。我们假设各组之间在这些测量上没有差异。在完成12个疗程的PTNS后,患者被随机分为每月或PRN维持组。生活质量、患者满意度和症状困扰程度用有效问卷进行评估。36例患者随机化:19例进行每月随访,17例进行PRN随访。PRN组表现出更高的生活质量(p=0.04),效应量大(0.82)。在三个月的时间里,按月治疗组和PRN治疗组的平均就诊次数没有显著差异,分别为1.79(±1.18)次和1.24(±1.35)次(p=0.20)。维持治疗6个月后,每月组42%的患者和PRN组53%的患者选择继续治疗(p=0.27)。在治疗满意度(p=0.62)或OAB症状变化百分比(p=0.13)方面,两组间无显著差异。每月随访与PRN随访在患者满意度和症状困扰方面无差异。然而,PRN组在生活质量方面得分更高。PRN维持可以优化治疗膀胱过度活动综合征患者的后胫神经刺激护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urogynaecologia International Journal
Urogynaecologia International Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信