Commentary on Levels of Education and Normative Data in Neuropsychological Tests

Sierra Sanjurjo Natalia, Torralva Teresa
{"title":"Commentary on Levels of Education and Normative Data in Neuropsychological Tests","authors":"Sierra Sanjurjo Natalia, Torralva Teresa","doi":"10.4172/2376-0281.1000316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the aims of neuropsychological assessment is the identification and classification of cognitive status. In this endeavor it is fundamental to compare the individual test score to scores obtained from a normative population. There is evidence that demographic factors exert influence on performance of neuropsychological tests [13]. A variety of studies have consistently reported negative correlations between different neuropsychological test scores and years of education, healthy adults with more years of schooling surpass those with lower in diverse cognitive tests [4,5]. Without appropriate knowledge about the impact of years of schooling on neuropsychological tests, false positive attributions may be routinely made [6]. Clinicians might overestimate cognitive impairment in individuals with limited education, as Ponton et al. [7] found, that non-demented individuals with less than 6 years of schooling score less than 2 standard deviations below average when compared with persons with 16 years of education. The aforementioned data stresses the value of analyze neuropsychological test scores considering education-adjusted norms.","PeriodicalId":91292,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2376-0281.1000316","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0281.1000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the aims of neuropsychological assessment is the identification and classification of cognitive status. In this endeavor it is fundamental to compare the individual test score to scores obtained from a normative population. There is evidence that demographic factors exert influence on performance of neuropsychological tests [13]. A variety of studies have consistently reported negative correlations between different neuropsychological test scores and years of education, healthy adults with more years of schooling surpass those with lower in diverse cognitive tests [4,5]. Without appropriate knowledge about the impact of years of schooling on neuropsychological tests, false positive attributions may be routinely made [6]. Clinicians might overestimate cognitive impairment in individuals with limited education, as Ponton et al. [7] found, that non-demented individuals with less than 6 years of schooling score less than 2 standard deviations below average when compared with persons with 16 years of education. The aforementioned data stresses the value of analyze neuropsychological test scores considering education-adjusted norms.
关于神经心理学测试中的教育水平和规范数据的评论
神经心理学评估的目的之一是识别和分类认知状态。在这一努力中,将个人测试分数与从标准人群中获得的分数进行比较是至关重要的。有证据表明,人口因素对神经心理测试的表现有影响。各种研究一致报道了不同神经心理测试分数与受教育年限之间的负相关,受教育年限较长的健康成年人在各种认知测试中优于受教育年限较低的成年人[4,5]。如果不了解受教育年限对神经心理测试的影响,可能会习惯性地做出假阳性归因。临床医生可能高估了受教育程度有限的个体的认知障碍,Ponton等人发现,与受教育程度为16年的人相比,受教育程度低于6年的非痴呆个体的得分低于平均水平2个标准差。上述数据强调了考虑教育调整规范的分析神经心理学测试分数的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信