Why Causal Inference Matters to Nurses: The Case of Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes

Q3 Nursing
D. Costa, O. Yakusheva
{"title":"Why Causal Inference Matters to Nurses: The Case of Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes","authors":"D. Costa, O. Yakusheva","doi":"10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1990s researchers have steadily built a broad evidence base for the association between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. However, the majority of the studies in the literature employ designs that are unable to robustly examine causal pathways to meaningful improvement in patient outcomes. A focus on causal inference is essential to moving the field of nursing research forward, and as part of the essential skill-set for all nurses as consumers of research. In this article, we aim to describe the importance of causal inference in nursing research and discuss study designs that are more likely to produce causal findings. We first review the conceptual framework supporting this discussion and then use selected examples from the literature, typifying three key study designs – cross-sectional, longitudinal, and randomized control trials (RCTs). The discussion will illustrate strengths and limitation of existing evidence, focusing on the causal pathway between nurse staffing and outcomes. The article conclusion considers implications for future research.","PeriodicalId":35614,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Since the early 1990s researchers have steadily built a broad evidence base for the association between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. However, the majority of the studies in the literature employ designs that are unable to robustly examine causal pathways to meaningful improvement in patient outcomes. A focus on causal inference is essential to moving the field of nursing research forward, and as part of the essential skill-set for all nurses as consumers of research. In this article, we aim to describe the importance of causal inference in nursing research and discuss study designs that are more likely to produce causal findings. We first review the conceptual framework supporting this discussion and then use selected examples from the literature, typifying three key study designs – cross-sectional, longitudinal, and randomized control trials (RCTs). The discussion will illustrate strengths and limitation of existing evidence, focusing on the causal pathway between nurse staffing and outcomes. The article conclusion considers implications for future research.
为什么因果推理对护士很重要:护士配备和患者预后的案例
自20世纪90年代初以来,研究人员已经为护士人员配备与患者预后之间的关系建立了广泛的证据基础。然而,文献中的大多数研究采用的设计无法强有力地检查患者预后有意义改善的因果途径。对因果推理的关注是推动护理研究领域向前发展的关键,也是作为研究消费者的所有护士的基本技能的一部分。在这篇文章中,我们的目的是描述因果推理在护理研究中的重要性,并讨论更有可能产生因果结果的研究设计。我们首先回顾了支持这一讨论的概念框架,然后从文献中选择了一些例子,对三种关键的研究设计进行了分类——横断面试验、纵向试验和随机对照试验(rct)。讨论将说明现有证据的优势和局限性,重点是护士人员配备和结果之间的因果途径。文章的结论考虑了对未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信