Comparison of Plaque Removal Capabilities between Two Dentifrices

D. Ralston, Rey Carrasco, P. Jacobsen, Cherie Wink Rdh
{"title":"Comparison of Plaque Removal Capabilities between Two Dentifrices","authors":"D. Ralston, Rey Carrasco, P. Jacobsen, Cherie Wink Rdh","doi":"10.4172/2332-0702.1000157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of a dental gel containing 2.6% Edathamil in controlling dental plaque to that of a commercially available dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan, 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer, and 0.243% sodium fluoride. \nMaterials and Methods: Following a baseline examination and index scoring for dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding, and pocket depths, qualifying adult male and female subjects were randomized into two groups. The subject’s teeth were professionally cleaned and then they were instructed to brush their teeth twice a day (morning and evening) for two minutes with their assigned dentifrice and a soft-bristled, manual toothbrush. Examinations for dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and pocket depths were repeated after two weeks and four weeks of product use. \nResults: Eight (8) subjects complied with the protocol and completed the study. Compared to the 0.3% triclosan/2.0% PVM/MA copolymer/0.243% sodium fluoride dentifrice group, the 2.6% Edathamil dental gel exhibited statistically significant reductions in all measured parameters, respectively, after four weeks of product use. \nConclusion: The overall results of this double-blind clinical study supports the conclusion that a dental gel containing 2.6% Edathamil is efficacious for the control of dental plaque, and that it provides a greater level of efficacy for the control of dental plaque biofilm than does a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan/2.0% PVM/MA copolymer/0.243% sodium fluoride.","PeriodicalId":90904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral hygiene & health","volume":"53 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2332-0702.1000157","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral hygiene & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0702.1000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a dental gel containing 2.6% Edathamil in controlling dental plaque to that of a commercially available dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan, 2.0% PVM/MA copolymer, and 0.243% sodium fluoride. Materials and Methods: Following a baseline examination and index scoring for dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding, and pocket depths, qualifying adult male and female subjects were randomized into two groups. The subject’s teeth were professionally cleaned and then they were instructed to brush their teeth twice a day (morning and evening) for two minutes with their assigned dentifrice and a soft-bristled, manual toothbrush. Examinations for dental plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and pocket depths were repeated after two weeks and four weeks of product use. Results: Eight (8) subjects complied with the protocol and completed the study. Compared to the 0.3% triclosan/2.0% PVM/MA copolymer/0.243% sodium fluoride dentifrice group, the 2.6% Edathamil dental gel exhibited statistically significant reductions in all measured parameters, respectively, after four weeks of product use. Conclusion: The overall results of this double-blind clinical study supports the conclusion that a dental gel containing 2.6% Edathamil is efficacious for the control of dental plaque, and that it provides a greater level of efficacy for the control of dental plaque biofilm than does a dentifrice containing 0.3% triclosan/2.0% PVM/MA copolymer/0.243% sodium fluoride.
两种牙菌斑清除能力的比较
目的:比较含有2.6%艾他米尔的牙凝胶与含有0.3%三氯生、2.0% PVM/MA共聚物和0.243%氟化钠的市售牙凝胶对牙菌斑的控制效果。材料和方法:在进行牙菌斑、牙龈炎、出血和牙袋深度的基线检查和指数评分后,将符合条件的成年男性和女性受试者随机分为两组。受试者的牙齿经过专业清洁,然后指示他们每天两次(早上和晚上)用指定的牙膏和软毛手动牙刷刷牙,每次两分钟。在使用产品两周和四周后,重复检查牙菌斑、牙龈炎、出血和口袋深度。结果:8名受试者遵守方案并完成研究。与0.3%三氯生/2.0% PVM/MA共聚物/0.243%氟化钠牙膏组相比,2.6% Edathamil牙科凝胶在使用四周后,在所有测量参数中分别显示出统计学上显著的降低。结论:本双盲临床研究的总体结果支持含2.6%艾他米尔的牙凝胶对牙菌斑的控制效果,且其对牙菌斑生物膜的控制效果优于含0.3%三氯生/2.0% PVM/MA共聚物/0.243%氟化钠的牙凝胶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信