Issues using logistic regression with class imbalance, with a case study from credit risk modelling

IF 1.7 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Yazhe Li, T. Bellotti, N. Adams
{"title":"Issues using logistic regression with class imbalance, with a case study from credit risk modelling","authors":"Yazhe Li, T. Bellotti, N. Adams","doi":"10.3934/fods.2019016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The class imbalance problem arises in two-class classification problems, when the less frequent (minority) class is observed much less than the majority class. This characteristic is endemic in many problems such as modeling default or fraud detection. Recent work by Owen [ 19 ] has shown that, in a theoretical context related to infinite imbalance, logistic regression behaves in such a way that all data in the rare class can be replaced by their mean vector to achieve the same coefficient estimates. We build on Owen's results to show the phenomenon remains true for both weighted and penalized likelihood methods. Such results suggest that problems may occur if there is structure within the rare class that is not captured by the mean vector. We demonstrate this problem and suggest a relabelling solution based on clustering the minority class. In a simulation and a real mortgage dataset, we show that logistic regression is not able to provide the best out-of-sample predictive performance and that an approach that is able to model underlying structure in the minority class is often superior.","PeriodicalId":73054,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/fods.2019016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The class imbalance problem arises in two-class classification problems, when the less frequent (minority) class is observed much less than the majority class. This characteristic is endemic in many problems such as modeling default or fraud detection. Recent work by Owen [ 19 ] has shown that, in a theoretical context related to infinite imbalance, logistic regression behaves in such a way that all data in the rare class can be replaced by their mean vector to achieve the same coefficient estimates. We build on Owen's results to show the phenomenon remains true for both weighted and penalized likelihood methods. Such results suggest that problems may occur if there is structure within the rare class that is not captured by the mean vector. We demonstrate this problem and suggest a relabelling solution based on clustering the minority class. In a simulation and a real mortgage dataset, we show that logistic regression is not able to provide the best out-of-sample predictive performance and that an approach that is able to model underlying structure in the minority class is often superior.
使用逻辑回归与阶级不平衡的问题,并以信用风险模型为例进行研究
类不平衡问题出现在两类分类问题中,当观察到频率较低的(少数)类比多数类少得多时。这个特征在许多问题中都很普遍,比如建模默认值或欺诈检测。Owen[19]最近的工作表明,在与无限不平衡相关的理论背景下,逻辑回归的行为方式是,所有罕见类中的数据都可以用它们的均值向量替换,以获得相同的系数估计。我们以欧文的结果为基础,表明这种现象对于加权和惩罚似然方法都是正确的。这样的结果表明,如果在稀有类中存在未被平均向量捕获的结构,则可能会出现问题。我们论证了这个问题,并提出了一种基于少数类聚类的重新标记解决方案。在模拟和真实抵押数据集中,我们表明逻辑回归无法提供最佳的样本外预测性能,并且能够在少数类别中建模底层结构的方法通常更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信