It's All a Matter of Time: Interval Timing and Competition for Stimulus Control

Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.3819/CCBR.2017.120007
Neil McMillan, M. Spetch, C. Sturdy, W. Roberts
{"title":"It's All a Matter of Time: Interval Timing and Competition for Stimulus Control","authors":"Neil McMillan, M. Spetch, C. Sturdy, W. Roberts","doi":"10.3819/CCBR.2017.120007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many modern humans explicitly experience time through its cultural constructs: We check our watches to determine if we have to leave for a meeting, we give directions based on how many minutes one should walk down a particular street before turning, and we hit snooze on our alarm clocks and dread the 10-min countdown to when we must roll out of bed. However, these daily experiences represent a sliver of how much time affects our lives, and our reliance on language-based social constructs such as “seconds” and “hours” belies an impressive, evolutionarily inbuilt system of timers that constantly govern behavior and cognition. It is not until we observe the breadth and accuracy of timing in nonhuman animal species that we can truly grasp how important these systems are. Interval timing is the timing of stimulus durations of seconds to minutes to hours, and has been of great interest to researchers in a wide variety of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience disciplines (Buhusi & Meck, 2005). Whereas circadian timing is coordinated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus and is concerned with regulating daily (24-hr) patterns such as the sleep cycle and feeding, and millisecond timing is a largely cerebellar process that assists mostly in motor coordination, Interval timing has been widely studied in humans and animals across a variety of different timescales. However, the majority of the literature in this topic has carried the implicit assumption that a mental or neural “clock” receives input and directs output separately from other learning processes. Here we present a review of interval timing as it relates to stimulus control and discuss the role of learning and attention in timing in the context of different experimental procedures. We show that time competes for control over behavior with other processes and suggest that when moving forward with theories of interval timing and general learning mechanisms, the two ought to be integrated.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2017.120007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Many modern humans explicitly experience time through its cultural constructs: We check our watches to determine if we have to leave for a meeting, we give directions based on how many minutes one should walk down a particular street before turning, and we hit snooze on our alarm clocks and dread the 10-min countdown to when we must roll out of bed. However, these daily experiences represent a sliver of how much time affects our lives, and our reliance on language-based social constructs such as “seconds” and “hours” belies an impressive, evolutionarily inbuilt system of timers that constantly govern behavior and cognition. It is not until we observe the breadth and accuracy of timing in nonhuman animal species that we can truly grasp how important these systems are. Interval timing is the timing of stimulus durations of seconds to minutes to hours, and has been of great interest to researchers in a wide variety of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience disciplines (Buhusi & Meck, 2005). Whereas circadian timing is coordinated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus and is concerned with regulating daily (24-hr) patterns such as the sleep cycle and feeding, and millisecond timing is a largely cerebellar process that assists mostly in motor coordination, Interval timing has been widely studied in humans and animals across a variety of different timescales. However, the majority of the literature in this topic has carried the implicit assumption that a mental or neural “clock” receives input and directs output separately from other learning processes. Here we present a review of interval timing as it relates to stimulus control and discuss the role of learning and attention in timing in the context of different experimental procedures. We show that time competes for control over behavior with other processes and suggest that when moving forward with theories of interval timing and general learning mechanisms, the two ought to be integrated.
分享
查看原文
这都是时间问题:间隔时间和刺激控制的竞争
许多现代人明确地通过其文化结构来体验时间:我们会看手表来决定是否要去参加会议,我们会根据在某条街道上走多少分钟才转弯给出指示,我们会按下闹钟的“小睡”键,害怕必须起床的10分钟倒计时。然而,这些日常经历代表了时间对我们生活影响的一小部分,我们对基于语言的社会结构(如“秒”和“小时”)的依赖掩盖了一个令人印象深刻的、进化中内置的计时器系统,它不断地控制着我们的行为和认知。直到我们观察到非人类动物物种计时的广度和准确性,我们才能真正理解这些系统的重要性。间隔计时是指刺激持续时间的计时,从秒到分钟到小时不等,这已经引起了各种行为和认知神经科学学科的研究人员的极大兴趣(Buhusi & Meck, 2005)。鉴于昼夜节律由视交叉上核协调,并与调节日常(24小时)模式(如睡眠周期和进食)有关,而毫秒计时主要是小脑过程,主要协助运动协调,间隔计时在各种不同的时间尺度上已在人类和动物中得到广泛研究。然而,这一主题的大多数文献都有一个隐含的假设,即心理或神经“时钟”接收输入并指导输出与其他学习过程分开。在此,我们回顾了与刺激控制相关的间隔时间,并讨论了在不同实验过程中学习和注意在间隔时间中的作用。我们表明,时间与其他过程竞争对行为的控制,并建议在推进间隔时间和一般学习机制的理论时,两者应该结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信