La detención preventiva en Colombia: Tensiones entre fines constitucionales y derechos fundamentales

Q3 Social Sciences
Diana Marcela Trujillo Vallejo, Sergio Orlando Silva Arroyave
{"title":"La detención preventiva en Colombia: Tensiones entre fines constitucionales y derechos fundamentales","authors":"Diana Marcela Trujillo Vallejo, Sergio Orlando Silva Arroyave","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002021000200325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article analyses how in Colombia, the implementation of the procedural institution of pre-trial detention constrains the fundamental right of freedom in pursuit of satisfying admissible constitutional ends, which causes tension between those. Therefore, as a solution to this conflict, the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court will be resorted —sentence C 469 of 2016— that develops the proportionality principle. It is concluded that the constitutional end of protection to the victim and the community is the only one that could be considered valid to impose the measure, because it protects concrete goods, and generates a true collision between fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000200325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This article analyses how in Colombia, the implementation of the procedural institution of pre-trial detention constrains the fundamental right of freedom in pursuit of satisfying admissible constitutional ends, which causes tension between those. Therefore, as a solution to this conflict, the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court will be resorted —sentence C 469 of 2016— that develops the proportionality principle. It is concluded that the constitutional end of protection to the victim and the community is the only one that could be considered valid to impose the measure, because it protects concrete goods, and generates a true collision between fundamental rights.
哥伦比亚的审前拘留:宪法目标与基本权利之间的紧张关系
本文分析了在哥伦比亚,为了满足可接受的宪法目的,审前拘留的程序性制度的实施如何限制了基本的自由权利,从而造成了两者之间的紧张关系。因此,作为解决这一冲突的办法,将诉诸哥伦比亚宪法法院的判例——2016年第C 469号判决——它发展了相称性原则。结论是,保护受害者和社区的宪法目的是可以被认为是强制实施该措施的唯一有效目的,因为它保护具体物品,并在基本权利之间产生真正的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信